Opportunistic evidence: evidence-based policy in the setting of the Australian Government's chlamydia screening pilot

被引:2
|
作者
Crouch, Simon R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Hlth & Ageing, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
health policy; review; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1071/AH10942
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. Chlamydia prevention and control form a significant part of the Australian Government's sexual health policy. This paper examines the evidence for policy development and in particular the role of systematic reviews in evidence-based policy. Methods. The author undertook a review of the literature on evidence-based policy. The major theories for evidence-based policy were then linked to the Australian Government's main chlamydia policy. Results. Asystematic review on chlamydia screening has been influential in policy development, but like all systematic reviews its validity must be assessed. It has been suggested that methodological appropriateness and the question being asked are perhaps more important than study design per se. Partnerships between researchers and policymakers are important but it should be noted that experts have their own particular biases. Policymaking can also be determined by political ideologies. Conclusions and implications. The publication of a systematic review has provided a good summative evaluation of chlamydia screening that has been built upon through partnerships with researchers. The resulting chlamydia screening pilot will provide further evidence for future policy; however, a variety of sources are required to develop robust policy directions.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:57 / 60
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evidence-based health policy versus evidence-based medicine
    Sturm, R
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2002, 53 (12) : 1499 - 1499
  • [22] IMPLEMENTING EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY IN A NETWORK SETTING: ROAD SAFETY POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS
    Bax, Charlotte
    de Jong, Martin
    Koppenjan, Joop
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 88 (03) : 871 - 884
  • [23] Relationship between evidence and policy: A case of evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence?
    Hunter, D. J.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 123 (09) : 583 - 586
  • [24] JAMA Forum: Lung Cancer Screening and Evidence-Based Policy
    Bindman, Andrew
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (01): : 17 - 18
  • [25] Routine HIV Screening - What Counts in Evidence-Based Policy?
    Bayer, Ronald
    Oppenheimer, Gerald M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (14): : 1265 - 1268
  • [26] Building Evidence for Evidence-Based Policy Making
    Dodge, Kenneth A.
    Mandel, Adam D.
    CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY, 2012, 11 (03) : 525 - 534
  • [27] Lessons from the evidence on evidence-based policy
    French, Richard D.
    CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2018, 61 (03): : 425 - 442
  • [28] What evidence of evidence-based public policy?
    Sim, F.
    Mackie, P.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 125 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [29] The Office of Management and Budget: The Quarterback of Evidence-Based Policy in the Federal Government
    Stack, Kathy
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 678 (01): : 112 - 123
  • [30] Evidence-based coverage policy
    Garber, AM
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (05) : 62 - 82