Income and Marital Status Interact on Obesity Among Black and White Men

被引:11
|
作者
Bell, Caryn N. [1 ,2 ]
Thorpe, Roland J., Jr. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept African Amer Studies, 1119 Taliaferro Hall, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Hopkins Ctr Hlth Dispar Solut, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
men of color; special populations; obesity; behavioral issues; marriage; psychosocial and cultural issues; BODY-MASS-INDEX; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; UNITED-STATES; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; US ADULTS; GENDER; PREVALENCE; HEALTH; ASSOCIATION; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1177/1557988319829952
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Racial disparities in obesity among men are accompanied by positive associations between income and obesity among Black men only. Race also moderates the positive association between marital status and obesity. This study sought to determine how race, income, and marital status interact on obesity among men. Using data from the 2007 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, obesity was measured as body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2) among 6,145 Black and White men. Income was measured by percentage of the federal poverty line and marital status was categorized as currently, formerly, or never married. Using logistic regression and interaction terms, the associations between income and obesity were assessed by race and marital status categories adjusted for covariates. Black compared to White (OR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.03, 1.38]), currently married compared to never married (OR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.24, 1.69]), and high-income men compared to low income men (OR = 1.26, 95% CI [1.06, 1.50]) had higher odds of obesity. A three-way interaction was significant and analyses identified that income was positively associated with obesity among currently married Black men and never married White men with the highest and lowest probabilities of obesity, respectively. High-income, currently married Black men had higher obesity rates and may be at increased risk for obesity-related morbidities.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mortality differences between black and white men in the USA: contribution of income and other risk factors among men screened for the MRFIT
    Smith, GD
    Neaton, JD
    Wentworth, D
    Stamler, R
    Stamler, J
    LANCET, 1998, 351 (9107): : 934 - 939
  • [22] Religiosity and marital stability among Black American and White American couples
    Brown, Edna
    Orbuch, Terri L.
    Bauermeister, Jose A.
    FAMILY RELATIONS, 2008, 57 (02) : 186 - 197
  • [23] DIMENSIONS OF MARITAL WELL-BEING AMONG WHITE AND BLACK NEWLYWEDS
    CROHAN, SE
    VEROFF, J
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1989, 51 (02): : 373 - 383
  • [24] MARITAL-STATUS AND CANCER INCIDENCE - DIFFERENCES IN THE BLACK AND WHITE-POPULATIONS
    SWANSON, GM
    BELLE, SH
    SATARIANO, WA
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1985, 45 (11) : 5883 - 5889
  • [25] MORTALITY DIFFERENCES ACCORDING TO MARITAL STATUS AMONG MEN AND WOMEN IN KUWAIT
    Shah, Nasra M.
    Thalib, Lukman
    Al-Ateeqi, Abdulaziz
    ASIAN POPULATION STUDIES, 2014, 10 (03) : 241 - 251
  • [26] Marital Status, Marital History, Body Weight, and Obesity
    Sobal, Jeffery
    Hanson, Karla L.
    MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW, 2011, 47 (07): : 474 - 504
  • [27] SOCIAL-MOBILITY AMONG YOUNG BLACK AND WHITE MEN - LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OF OCCUPATIONAL PRESTIGE AND INCOME
    LYON, L
    ABELL, T
    PACIFIC SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1979, 22 (02): : 201 - 222
  • [28] The Effect of Marital Status on Home Ownership among Low-Income Households
    Grinstein-Weiss, Michal
    Charles, Pajarita
    Guo, Shenyang
    Manturuk, Kim
    Key, Clinton
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 2011, 85 (03) : 475 - 503
  • [29] STROKE RATES BY HYPERTENSION STATUS FOR WHITE AND BLACK MEN AND WOMEN
    Lackland, D. T.
    Mountford, W. K.
    Gilbert, G.
    Walters, C. A.
    Egan, B. M.
    ETHNICITY & DISEASE, 2008, 18 (03) : S20 - S20
  • [30] Marital quality in black and white marriages
    Broman, CL
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY ISSUES, 2005, 26 (04) : 431 - 441