Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Have We Made Progress?

被引:7
|
作者
Roman, Robert [1 ]
Mussarat, Naiha [1 ]
Detti, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
Poor responder; Bologna criteria; gonadotropins; DHEA; CoQ10; cytoplasm; progress; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; BOLOGNA CRITERIA; PREGNANCY RATE; WOMEN; IVF; SUPPLEMENTATION; MATURATION; LETROZOLE; CYCLES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2174/1389201018666171002132853
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Poor ovarian responders (POR) pose a challenge to a physicians' ability to choose a stimulation protocol that maximizes the number of oocytes harvested and their chances of conception with multiple protocols aimed at improving pregnancy rates in this poor prognosis population. The Bologna criteria standardized the diagnosis of POR and allows for a more homogenous patient population in clinical trials. Methods: A structured review of the literature, which encompasses research on Bologna-defined POR, identified several proposed protocols to optimize pregnancy rates in poor responders. In addition, we reviewed the utility of utilizing oocyte quality enhancers such as luteal pre-treatment, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and growth hormone (GH). Conclusion: Controlled ovarian stimulation strategies with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors and clomiphene citrate have shown similar pregnancy outcomes to higher dose gonadotropin in GnRH antagonist protocols. While the standardization of Bologna defined POR has allowed for more comparable patient populations to study the effectiveness of different protocols for ovarian stimulation, there is currently no convincing data that has determined the ideal protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in this patient population. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 618
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Hyperphosphataemia in 2019: have we made progress?
    Hutchison, Alastair J.
    Wald, Ron
    Hiemstra, Thomas F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2019, 28 (05): : 441 - 447
  • [12] Infantile Spasms—Have We Made Progress?
    Sarah Aminoff Kelley
    Kelly G. Knupp
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2018, 18
  • [13] Have we made progress in the treatment of GVHD?
    Harris, Andrew C.
    Levine, John E.
    Ferrara, James L. M.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL HAEMATOLOGY, 2012, 25 (04) : 473 - 478
  • [14] Severe Asthma: Have We Made Progress?
    Poon, Audrey H.
    Hamid, Qutayba
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2016, 13 : S68 - S77
  • [15] HAVE WE REALLY MADE MUCH PROGRESS
    OPDERBECK, H
    JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS, 1982, 1 (02): : 193 - 194
  • [16] Long-term ovarian function and fertility outcome in 'poor responders' to ovarian stimulation
    Lawson, R
    Kassab, A
    Anderson, H
    Hart, R
    Taylor, A
    Braude, P
    Parsons, J
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 : 202 - 202
  • [17] Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
    Thor Haahr
    Sandro C. Esteves
    Peter Humaidan
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 16
  • [18] What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF?
    Blumenfeld, Zeev
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [19] A NEWER APPROACH FOR OVARIAN STIMULATION IN POOR RESPONDERS UNDERGOING IVF.
    Nayar, K. D. E. V.
    Agarwal, A.
    Ved, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S165 - S166
  • [20] Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
    Haahr, Thor
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    Humaidan, Peter
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 16