Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Have We Made Progress?

被引:7
|
作者
Roman, Robert [1 ]
Mussarat, Naiha [1 ]
Detti, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
关键词
Poor responder; Bologna criteria; gonadotropins; DHEA; CoQ10; cytoplasm; progress; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; BOLOGNA CRITERIA; PREGNANCY RATE; WOMEN; IVF; SUPPLEMENTATION; MATURATION; LETROZOLE; CYCLES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2174/1389201018666171002132853
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Poor ovarian responders (POR) pose a challenge to a physicians' ability to choose a stimulation protocol that maximizes the number of oocytes harvested and their chances of conception with multiple protocols aimed at improving pregnancy rates in this poor prognosis population. The Bologna criteria standardized the diagnosis of POR and allows for a more homogenous patient population in clinical trials. Methods: A structured review of the literature, which encompasses research on Bologna-defined POR, identified several proposed protocols to optimize pregnancy rates in poor responders. In addition, we reviewed the utility of utilizing oocyte quality enhancers such as luteal pre-treatment, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and growth hormone (GH). Conclusion: Controlled ovarian stimulation strategies with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors and clomiphene citrate have shown similar pregnancy outcomes to higher dose gonadotropin in GnRH antagonist protocols. While the standardization of Bologna defined POR has allowed for more comparable patient populations to study the effectiveness of different protocols for ovarian stimulation, there is currently no convincing data that has determined the ideal protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in this patient population. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 618
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ovarian stimulation modalities in poor responders
    Ozkan, Zehra Sema
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 49 (04) : 959 - 962
  • [2] Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?
    Polat, Mehtap
    Mumusoglu, Sezcan
    Yarali Ozbek, Irem
    Bozdag, Gurkan
    Yarali, Hakan
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 15
  • [3] Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders
    Zhang, Wei
    Wang, Meimei
    Wang, Shuang
    Bao, Hongchu
    Qu, Qinglan
    Zhang, Ning
    Hao, Cuifang
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2018, 22 (03): : 193 - 198
  • [4] Have We Made the Progress?
    K. S. Gopinath
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 12 : 453 - 453
  • [5] Have We Made the Progress?
    Gopinath, K. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (03) : 453 - 453
  • [6] Ovarian cancer stem cells: What progress have we made?
    Al-Alem, Linah F.
    Pandya, Unnati M.
    Baker, Andrew T.
    Bellio, Chiara
    Zarrella, Bianca D.
    Clark, Justin
    DiGloria, Celeste M.
    Rueda, Bo R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY, 2019, 107 : 92 - 103
  • [7] Ovarian stimulation in poor responders using GnRH antagonists
    Nikolettos, N
    Al-Hasani, S
    Felberbaum, R
    Kupker, W
    Schopper, B
    Sturm, R
    Diedrich, K
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 : 125 - 125
  • [8] SAY NO to mild ovarian stimulation for all poor responders: it is time to realize that not all poor responders are the same
    Polyzos, N. P.
    Popovic-Todorovic, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (09) : 1964 - 1971
  • [9] The addition of clomiphene citrate to ovarian stimulation protocols for poor responders
    Triantafyllidou, Olga
    Sigalos, Giorgos
    Gkoles, Laertis
    Kastora, Stavroula
    Vakas, Panagiotis
    Batsiou, Eugenia
    Vlahos, Nikos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 251 : 136 - 140
  • [10] Overprescribing: have we made any progress?
    Pillans, PI
    Roberts, MS
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 29 (04): : 485 - 486