Resolution of a Low-Lying Placenta and Placenta Previa Diagnosed at the Midtrimester Anatomy Scan

被引:2
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ogx.0000550508.65923.dc
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Placenta previa or low-lying placenta is identified on a significant number of midtrimester ultrasounds (USs), and the large majority of these resolve by term. While guidelines recommend follow-up US at 32 weeks' gestation to assess for resolution of midtrimester previa, limited data exist to support this recommendation. This study sought to determine the incidence and rate of resolution of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa identified in the midtrimester. The authors sought to assess the optimal time to perform follow-up US in the third trimester to assess for resolution and to identify factors associated with resolution of placenta previa and a low-lying placenta. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with a diagnosis of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa at the time of anatomy screening at a single institution between February 12, 2010, and April 30, 2015. Patients were eligible if they had a low-lying placenta or placenta previa with continuation of pregnancy beyond viability (defined as a gestational age of >24 weeks 0 days). Fetal anatomy surveys were performed between 18 weeks 0 days and 23 weeks 6 days. The placental location in relation to the maternal cervix was assessed by US for all patients. Transvaginal US was performed by trained sonographers, measuring the distance from the leading placental edge to the internal cervical os. Patients with a leading placental edge of greater than 0 mm but 20 mm or less from the internal cervical os were diagnosed with a low-lying placenta, whereas patients with a leading placental edge overlapping the internal cervical os were diagnosed with placenta previa. The study found that a low-lying placenta or placenta previa was diagnosed in 8.7% of women at the midtrimester anatomy survey when using transvaginal US. Although the incidence in the population was high, most women who returned for additional assessments had resolution, and 95% of resolutions occurred by 17 weeks from diagnosis (corresponding to 36 weeks' gestation in the cohort). The distance from the internal cervical os at the time of the midtrimester anatomy survey and multiparity were predictors of resolution, whereas prior cesarean delivery was not. In all, 91.9% (95% confidence interval, 90.2%-93.3%) of women with a diagnosis of a low-lying placenta or placenta previa at the midtrimester anatomy survey had resolution before delivery. The median time to resolution was 10 weeks from diagnosis (corresponding to 29 weeks' gestation in the cohort), with a 95th percentile of 17 weeks (corresponding to 36 weeks' gestation in our cohort). The chance of resolution was inversely proportional to the distance of the placental edge from the internal os and was 99.5% for women with the placental 10 and 20 mm from the internal os and 72.3% for women with a placenta previa. Resolution of low lying placenta occurs in most cases by the third trimester. Optimal timing of follow-up US should balance the potential benefit of diagnosing resolution at an earlier gestational age with the possible need for multiple additional US assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 13
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relationship between placenta location and resolution of second trimester placenta previa
    Feng, Yun
    Li, Xue-yin
    Xiao, Juan
    Li, Wei
    Liu, Jing
    Zeng, Xue
    Chen, Xi
    Chen, Kai-yue
    Fan, Lei
    Chen, Su-hua
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 37 (03) : 390 - 394
  • [42] Pregnancy Complicated by Cervical Varix and Low-Lying Placenta: A Case Report
    Kurihara, Yasushi
    Tachibana, Daisuke
    Teramae, Masatomo
    Matsumoto, Makiko
    Terada, Hiroyuki
    Sumi, Toshiyuki
    Koyama, Masayasu
    Ishiko, Osamu
    JAPANESE CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2013, 4 : 21 - 24
  • [43] THE MID-TRIMESTER LOW-LYING PLACENTA - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    TREMEWAN, RN
    CHANDRA, M
    DUFF, GB
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 92 (666) : 151 - 153
  • [44] Cervical length and risk of antepartum hemorrhage in presence of low-lying placenta
    Curti, Alessandra
    Potti, Sushma
    Di Donato, Nadine
    Simonazzi, Giuliana
    Rizzo, Nicola
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (06): : 563 - 565
  • [45] ABNORMAL ULTRASOUND FINDINGS RELATING PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND OUTCOME OF THE LOW-LYING PLACENTA
    Naruse, Katsuhiko
    Shigemitsu, Aiko
    Akasaka, Juria
    Yoshimoto, Chiharu
    Tsunemi, Taihei
    Sado, Toshiyuki
    Kobayashi, Hiroshi
    PLACENTA, 2015, 36 (10) : A6 - A6
  • [46] Trial of Labor Compared With Elective Cesarean Delivery for Low-Lying Placenta
    Froeliger, Alizee
    Madar, Hugo
    Jeanneteau, Pauline
    Ruiz, Vanessa
    Le Lous, Maela
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Dreyfus, Michel
    Merviel, Philippe
    Mattuizzi, Aurelien
    Jauniaux, Eric
    Sentilhes, Loic
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (03): : 429 - 438
  • [47] Revisiting low-lying placenta: internal os distance and pregnancy outcomes
    Rizkallah, Andrea
    Cohn, Ellery
    Thiele, Lisa R.
    Ho, Milan
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    McIntire, Donald D.
    Herrera, Christina L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S589 - S589
  • [48] ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSIS OF PLACENTA PREVIA - VALUE OF A POSTVOID SCAN
    WILLIAMSON, D
    BJORGEN, J
    BAIER, B
    WORMAN, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1978, 6 (01) : 58 - 58
  • [49] Midtrimester Termination of Pregnancy Complicated by Complete Placenta Previa A Report of 2 Cases
    Chen, Yang
    Li, Yang
    Wang, Yan
    Zha, Wenhui
    Tian, Yuan
    Wu, Fuju
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 64 (11-12) : 443 - 446
  • [50] Likelihood of antepartum haemorrhage (APH) in women with low-lying placentae (LLP) at anomaly scan, and association with placenta praevia (PP)
    Gould, G.
    Boyd, S.
    Page, L.
    Girling, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 30 - 30