Validation of 2 depression screening tools in dialysis patients

被引:250
|
作者
Watnick, S [1 ]
Wang, PL
Demadura, T
Ganzini, L
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, VA Dialysis Unit, Dept Med, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland VA Med Ctr, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Div Mental Hlth, Portland, OR USA
[4] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Div Hosp & Specialty Med, Portland, OR USA
关键词
dialysis; depression; screening;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Depression is the most common psychiatric disorder in long-term dialysis patients and is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. An efficient and valid method of diagnosing depression might facilitate recognition and treatment. We sought to validate 2 depression assessment tools, the 21-question Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the 9-question Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), in a dialysis population. Methods: We surveyed patients who had received dialysis for at least 90 days in Portland, OR. We excluded patients with dementia, delirium, or a history of major psychiatric disorders other than depression. The Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, a gold-standard measure for depression, was administered by trained psychologists within 2 weeks of the BDI and PHQ-9. Results: Of 62 enrolled subjects, 16 were diagnosed with a depressive disorder, including 12 patients (19%) with major depression, 3 patients with dysthymia, and I patient with minor depression. Optimal BDI and PHQ-9 cutoff values for depressive disorders combined was 16 or greater and 10 or greater, respectively. Sensitivities were 91% and 92%, specificities were 86% and 92%, positive predictive values were 59% and 71 %, and negative predictive values were both 98%,with kappa valuesof 0.65 and 0.75, respectively. The difference between the 2 receiver operating characteristic curves was not statistically significant (P > 0.9). Conclusion: Our results validate the PHQ-9 and revalidate the BDI against a gold-standard measure for depressive disorders in the dialysis population. Both tools performed equally well. Because depression is prevalent, readily diagnosed, and associated with poor outcomes, screening by means of short and valid measurement tools may lead to better diagnosis and treatment of this modifiable risk factor. This may lead to improved clinical outcomes in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 46:919-924. (c) 2005 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 924
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Depression and outcomes of dialysis patients
    Lindsay, Robert McGregor
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 27 (02) : 858 - 858
  • [32] The validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) as a screening tool for depression in patients with advanced cancer
    Lloyd-Williams, M
    Friedman, T
    Rudd, N
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2001, 10 (03) : 271 - 271
  • [33] The validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) as a screening fool for depression in patients with advanced cancer
    Lloyd-Williams, M
    Friedman, T
    Rudd, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S362 - S362
  • [34] Validation of Emotional Thermometers as Screening Tools for Mexican Patients Undergoing Breast Biopsies
    de Jesus Sanchez-Jauregui, Teresa
    Marisol Juarez-Garcia, Dehisy
    Tellez, Arnoldo
    PSYCHOLOGY IN RUSSIA-STATE OF THE ART, 2020, 13 (02): : 96 - 108
  • [35] Validation of Screening Tools for Predicting the Risk of Functional Decline in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
    Wang, Mei-Chun
    Liao, Wen-Chun
    Lee, Kwo-Chen
    Lu, Shu-Hua
    Lin, Yun-Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [36] SCREENING FOR DEPRESSION IN PRIMARY-CARE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE DEPRESSION SCALE, A SCREENING INSTRUMENT FOR DEPRESSION
    SALOKANGAS, RKR
    POUTANEN, O
    STENGARD, E
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 92 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [37] Validation of screening tools for depression and anxiety disorders in a primary care population with high HIV prevalence in Zimbabwe
    Chibanda, Dixon
    Verhey, Ruth
    Gibson, Lorna J.
    Munetsi, Epiphania
    Machando, Debra
    Rusakaniko, Simbarashe
    Munjoma, Ronald
    Araya, Ricardo
    Weiss, Helen A.
    Abas, Melanie
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 198 : 50 - 55
  • [38] Screening for perinatal depression: a review of tools and barriers
    Suchowiak, Sara
    Wszolek, Katarzyna
    Suwalska, Julia
    Lojko, Dorota
    Suwalska, Aleksandra
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIA I NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2020, 15 (1-2): : 60 - 69
  • [39] Combine these screening tools to detect bipolar depression
    Aquadro, Emily
    Youssef, Nagy A.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 67 (08): : 500 - 503
  • [40] Validation of Malnutrition Screening Tools in Liver Cirrhosis
    Traub, Julia
    Bergheim, Ina
    Horvath, Angela
    Stadlbauer, Vanessa
    NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (05)