Impact of shoulder, elbow, and knee joint involvement on assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using the American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set

被引:41
|
作者
Tanaka, E [1 ]
Saito, A [1 ]
Kamitsuji, S [1 ]
Yamada, T [1 ]
Nakajima, A [1 ]
Taniguchi, A [1 ]
Hara, M [1 ]
Tomatsu, T [1 ]
Yamanaka, H [1 ]
Kamatani, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Inst Rheumatol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1620054, Japan
来源
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; disease activity assessment; ACR Core Data Set; joint involvement;
D O I
10.1002/art.21589
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To determine the most sensitive scoring method for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity using the American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set. Methods. The subjects were 4,530 patients with RA (mean age 57.9 years, mean disease duration 12.7 years) who participated in a large observational cohort study of RA patients. The 68 joints assessed were classified into 15 joint areas, and each joint variable was categorized based on the presence or absence of swelling or pain in these areas. Multiple linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate the significance of effects of these 15 joint areas on variables for assessment of RA disease activity such as patient's assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity on a VAS, HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire), and Japanese HAQ. Results. Although the 3 most frequently affected joints were the wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints, and proximal interphalangeal joints, the 5 joints with the largest contributions to all of the variables assessed for disease activity were the shoulder, elbow, and knee joints, followed by the wrist and ankle joints. The combination of shoulder, elbow, and knee joints accounted for approximately 70% of the contribution to all the variables, while addition of the wrist and ankle joints increased this value to approximately 90%. Conclusion. Scoring for assessment of RA disease activity would be more sensitive if separate joints such as the shoulder, elbow, knee, wrist, and ankle joints were weighted differently.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 871
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] 2019 American College of Rheumatology Recommended Patient-Reported Functional Status Assessment Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Barber, Claire E. H.
    Zell, JoAnn
    Yazdany, Jinoos
    Davis, Aileen M.
    Cappelli, Laura
    Ehrlich-Jones, Linda
    Everix, Donna
    Thorne, J. Carter
    Bohm, Victoria
    Suter, Lisa
    Limanni, Alex
    Michaud, Kaleb
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2019, 71 (12) : 1531 - 1539
  • [12] Assessment of American College of Rheumatology-Endorsed Quality Indicators in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients A Quality Improvement Initiative
    Anderson, Erik
    Bajaj, Puneet
    Raghavan, Siddharth
    Patnaik, Asha
    Roppelt, Heidi
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 22 (02) : 63 - 67
  • [13] Assessment of American college of rheumatology quality criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a pre-quality criteria patient cohort
    Kahn, K. L.
    MacLean, C. H.
    Wong, A. L.
    Rubenstein, L. Z.
    Liu, H.
    Fitzpatrick, D. M.
    Harker, J. O.
    Chen, W. P.
    Traina, S. B.
    Mittman, B. S.
    Hahn, B. H.
    Paulus, H. E.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2007, 57 (05): : 707 - 715
  • [14] THE AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY CORE SET AND SF-36 IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS - PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL FUNCTIONING MEASURES OF THE SF-36 ARE STRONGLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE (HAQ)
    BIRRELL, FN
    HASSELL, A
    DAWES, PT
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (09): : 135 - 135
  • [15] American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Remission Criteria Achievement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data From 32 Countries
    Khan, Nasim A.
    Sokka, Tuulikki
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S959 - S959
  • [16] Can American College of Rheumatology Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis Be Assessed Using Self-Report Data?-Comparison of Self-Reported Data with Chart Review.
    Chang, Jack
    Rogers, Pam
    Lacaille, Diane
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S49 - S49
  • [17] American College of Rheumatology Response Rates Determined Using 28 Versus 68/66 Joint Count in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib in Phase 3 Studies
    Smolen, Josef S.
    Shergy, William
    Wright, Grace C.
    DeMasi, Ryan
    Kwok, Kenneth
    Mojcik, Christopher F.
    Iikuni, Noriko
    Tatulych, Svitlana
    Citera, Gustavo
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 69
  • [18] Using Parallel Streams of Evidence to Inform Guideline Development: The Case of the 2021 American College of Rheumatology Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis Guideline
    Yaacoub, Sally
    Khamis, Assem M.
    Al-Gibbawi, Mounir
    Kahale, Lara A.
    Bathon, Joan
    England, Bryant R.
    Fraenkel, Liana
    St Clair, E. William
    Turner, Amy S.
    Akl, Elie A.
    ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 3 (09) : 629 - 635
  • [19] American College of Rheumatology Quality Indicators for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Benchmarking, Variability, and Opportunities to Improve Quality of Care Using the Electronic Health Record
    Adhikesavan, Leena G.
    Newman, Eric D.
    Diehl, Mark P.
    Wood, G. Craig
    Bili, Androniki
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (12): : 1705 - 1712
  • [20] Toward a Data-Driven Evaluation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis Is It Sensible to Look at Levels of Rheumatoid Factor?
    van der Linden, M. P. M.
    Batstra, M. R.
    Bakker-Jonges, L. E.
    Detert, J.
    Bastian, H.
    Scherer, H. U.
    Toes, R. E. M.
    Burmester, G-R
    Mjaavatten, M. D.
    Kvien, T. K.
    Huizinga, T. W. J.
    van der Helm-van Mil, A. H. M.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (05): : 1190 - 1199