Proper timing for the evaluation of neonatal brain white matter development: a diffusion tensor imaging study

被引:9
|
作者
Jin, Chao [1 ]
Li, Yanyan [1 ]
Li, Xianjun [1 ]
Wang, Miaomiao [1 ]
Liu, Congcong [1 ]
Gao, Jie [1 ]
Sun, Qinli [1 ]
Qiu, Deqiang [2 ]
Zeng, Lingxia [3 ]
Zhou, Xihui [4 ]
Li, Gailian [4 ]
Zhang, Jinni [5 ]
Zheng, Jie [6 ]
Yang, Jian [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Neonatol, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pediat, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[6] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Clin Res Ctr, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Newborn; White matter; Child development; Diffusion tensor imaging; PRETERM INFANTS; MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; TERM; NEWBORN; LATERALIZATION; MYELINATION; MATURATION; MRI; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5665-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveWe aimed to determine the timing for assessing birth status of the developing brain (i.e. brain maturity at birth) by exploring the postnatal age-related changes in neonatal brain white matter (WM).MethodsThe institutional review board approved this study and all informed parental consents were obtained. 133 neonates (gestational age, 30-42 weeks) without abnormalities on MRI were studied with regard to WM development by diffusion tensor imaging-derived fractional anisotropy (FA). Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), locally-weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) and piecewise linear-fitting were used to investigate the relationship between FA and postnatal age. FA along corticospinal tract (CST), optic radiation (OR), auditory radiation (AR) and thalamus-primary somatosensory cortex (thal-PSC) were extracted by automated fibre-tract quantification; their differences and associations with neonatal neurobehavioural scores at various postnatal age ranges were analysed by Wilcoxon's rank-sum test and Pearson's correlation.ResultsUsing TBSS, postnatal age (days 1-28) positively correlated with FA in multiple WMs, including CST, OR, AR and thal-PSC (p<0.05). On the other hand, when narrowing the postnatal age window to days 1-14, no significant correlation was found, suggesting a biphasic WM development. LOESS and piecewise linear-fitting indicated that FA increased mildly before day 14 and its growth accelerated thereafter. Both FA and correlations with neurobehavioural scores in postnatal age range 2 (days 15-28) were significantly higher than in range 1 (days 1-14) (FA comparison: p<0.05; maximal correlation-coefficient: 0.693 vs. 0.169).ConclusionBrain WM development during the neonatal stage includes two phases, i.e. a close-to-birth period within the first 14 days and a following accelerated maturation period. Therefore, evaluations of birth status should preferably be performed during the first period.Key Points center dot Brain white matter development within the first two postnatal weeks resembles a close-to-birth maturation.center dot Brain white matter development in the audio-visual, sensorimotor regions accelerates after two postnatal weeks.center dot Postnatal age-related effects should be considered in comparing preterm and term neonates.
引用
收藏
页码:1527 / 1537
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] White matter microstructural abnormalities in bipolar disorder: A whole brain diffusion tensor imaging study
    Barysheva, Marina
    Jahanshad, Neda
    Foland-Ross, Lara
    Altshuler, Lori L.
    Thompson, Paul M.
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2013, 2 : 558 - 568
  • [32] Altered microstructure of brain white matter in females with anorexia nervosa: a diffusion tensor imaging study
    Hu, Shao-Hua
    Feng, Hong
    Xu, Ting-Ting
    Zhang, Hao-Rong
    Zhao, Zhi-Yong
    Lai, Jian-Bo
    Xu, Dong-Rong
    Xu, Yi
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2017, 13 : 2829 - 2836
  • [33] Abnormal brain white matter in patients with right trigeminal neuralgia: a diffusion tensor imaging study
    Junpeng Liu
    Jiajia Zhu
    Fei Yuan
    Xuejun Zhang
    Quan Zhang
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2018, 19
  • [34] White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study
    Kraus, Marilyn F.
    Susmaras, Teresa
    Caughlin, Benjamin P.
    Walker, Corey J.
    Sweeney, John A.
    Little, Deborah M.
    BRAIN, 2007, 130 : 2508 - 2519
  • [35] Abnormal brain white matter in patients with right trigeminal neuralgia: a diffusion tensor imaging study
    Liu, Junpeng
    Zhu, Jiajia
    Yuan, Fei
    Zhang, Xuejun
    Zhang, Quan
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2018, 19
  • [36] Selective effects of aging on brain white matter microstructure: A diffusion tensor imaging tractography study
    Michielse, Stijn
    Coupland, Nick
    Camicioli, Richard
    Carter, Rawle
    Seres, Peter
    Sabino, Jennifer
    Malykhin, Nikolai
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 52 (04) : 1190 - 1201
  • [37] Diffusion tensor imaging: Study of white-matter brain in paediatric patients with Gaucher disease
    Davies, Elin
    Seunarine, Kiran
    Clark, Chris
    Ashok, Vellodi
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2011, 102 (02) : S13 - S13
  • [38] Diffusion Tensor Imaging - Current Possibilities of Brain White Matter Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kerkovsky, M.
    Sprlakova-Pukova, A.
    Kasparek, T.
    Fadrus, P.
    Mechl, M.
    Valek, V.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2010, 73 (02) : 136 - 142
  • [39] Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Cerebral White Matter
    Stoeter, Peter
    Dellani, Paulo Roberto
    Vucurevic, Goran
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) : 155 - 162
  • [40] MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Window into White Matter Integrity of the Working Brain
    Chanraud, Sandra
    Zahr, Natalie
    Sullivan, Edith V.
    Pfefferbaum, Adolf
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 20 (02) : 209 - 225