Reproducibility of multifocal VEP latency using different stimulus presentations

被引:9
|
作者
Sriram, Prema [1 ]
Klistorner, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Arvind, Hemamalini [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Graham, Stuart L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Australian Sch Adv Med, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Save Sight Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Concord Repatriat & Gen Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Multifocal VEP; Latency; Reproducibility; Pattern pulse; Pattern reversal; VISUAL-EVOKED POTENTIALS; OPTIC NEURITIS; OBJECTIVE PERIMETRY; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; FIELD; GLAUCOMA; LESIONS; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1007/s10633-012-9334-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The aims of the article were to study the reproducibility of latency of multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) recorded using different stimulus presentations and to identify the peak with least variability. Ten normal subjects, aged between 22 and 52 years (mean age 32 +/- A 8.37 years), participated in the study. All subjects underwent mfVEP testing with pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulus presentations. The stimulus subtends 26A degrees from fixation and includes 24 segments. Only the vertical channel was recorded on all subjects. Testing was repeated after 1-2 weeks. Only the right eye of all subjects was analysed. Segments with low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR < 1.5) were excluded from analysis. The latencies were analysed to confirm values from the same peak for the two tests. The latency values were then analysed for the start of the response, the first peak and the second peak. The waveforms were reproducible throughout the field. Reproducibility of latency at the "start of the response" was significantly lesser than the first and the second peaks studied, while the reproducibility of latency at the first peak was not statistically different from the second peak for either pattern reversal or pattern pulse stimulation. The latency values were not different between the first and the second sessions for either pattern reversal or pattern pulse stimulation for any of the peaks. The pattern reversal stimulus presentation produced less variability in latency. The first peak is the most reproducible among the three measures in both the stimulus presentation.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISONS OF INCIDENTAL AND INTENTIONAL LEARNING AFTER DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF STIMULUS PRESENTATIONS
    SALTZMAN, IJ
    ATKINSON, RL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 67 (03): : 521 - 524
  • [22] Reproducibility of multifocal ERG using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
    Bueltmann, S
    Weimer, P
    Rohrschneider, K
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (04) : S69 - S69
  • [23] Same but different: The latency of a shared expectation signal interacts with stimulus attributes
    Lowe, Benjamin G.
    Robinson, Jonathan E.
    Yamamoto, Naohide
    Hogendoorn, Hinze
    Johnston, Patrick
    CORTEX, 2023, 168 : 143 - 156
  • [24] STIMULUS OMISSION AND THE ORIENTING RESPONSE - LATENCY DIFFERENCES SUGGEST DIFFERENT MECHANISMS
    BARRY, RJ
    OGORMAN, JG
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 25 (03) : 261 - 276
  • [25] Recognition of small stimulus screen masks using the multifocal ERG
    Marmor M.F.
    Chappelow A.V.
    Luo G.
    Documenta Ophthalmologica, 2002, 104 (3) : 277 - 286
  • [26] Diagnostic value of multifocal VEP using cross-validation and noise reduction in glaucoma research
    Lindenberg, T
    Peters, A
    Horn, FK
    Lausen, B
    Korth, M
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 242 (05) : 361 - 367
  • [27] Diagnostic value of multifocal VEP using cross-validation and noise reduction in glaucoma research
    Thomas Lindenberg
    Andrea Peters
    Folkert K. Horn
    Berthold Lausen
    Matthias Korth
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2004, 242 : 361 - 367
  • [28] Selective Stimulation of Non-Redundant Pathways Enhances the Detection of Glaucoma Using Multifocal Vep
    Klistorner, A.
    Arvind, H.
    Grigg, J.
    Graham, S. L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [29] AMPLITUDE AND LATENCY CHANGES IN THE VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIAL TO DIFFERENT STIMULUS INTENSITIES
    CONNOLLY, JF
    GRUZELIER, JH
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 19 (06) : 599 - 608
  • [30] Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels
    Sisto, Renata
    Moleti, Arturo
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 122 (04): : 2183 - 2190