The rotator cuff muscles are antagonists after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:43
|
作者
Giles, Joshua W. [1 ,2 ]
Langohr, G. Daniel G. [2 ]
Johnson, James A. [2 ]
Athwal, George S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Mech Engn, London, England
[2] Western Univ, St Josephs Hlth Care, Roth McFarlane Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, Bioengn Res Lab, London, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; RTSA; RSA; shoulder; rotator cuff; simulator; cuff tear arthropathy; GLENOHUMERAL ARTHRITIS; JOINT LOAD; SUBSCAPULARIS; DISLOCATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPROVE; REPAIR; MOTION; RANGE; FORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.028
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: There is disagreement regarding whether, when possible, the rotator cuff should be repaired in conjunction with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Therefore, we investigated the effects of rotator cuff repair in RTSA models with varying magnitudes of humeral and gienosphere lateralization. Methods: Six fresh frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested on a validated in vitro muscle-driven motion simulator. Each specimen was implanted with a custom adjustable, load-sensing RTSA after creation of a simulated rotator cuff tear. The effects of 4 RTSA configurations (0 and 10 mm of humeral lateralization and glenosphere lateralization) on deltoid force and joint load during abduction with and without rotator cuff repair were assessed. Results: Deltoid force was significantly affected by increasing humeral lateralization (-2.5% +/- 1.7% body weight [BW], P = .016) and glenosphere lateralization (+ 7.7% +/- 5.6% BW, P = .016). Rotator cuff repair interacted with humeral and glenosphere lateralization (P = .005), such that with no humeral lateralization, glenosphere lateralization increased deltoid force without cuff repair (8.1% +/- 5.1% BW, P = .012). This effect was increased with cuff repair (12.8% +/- 7.8% BW, P = .010), but the addition of humeral lateralization mitigated this effect. Rotator cuff repair increased joint load (+ 11.9% +/- 5.1% BW, P = .002), as did glenosphere lateralization (+ 13.3% +/- 3.7% BW, P <.001). These interacted, such that increasing glenosphere lateralization markedly increased the negative effects of cuff repair (9.4% +/- 3.2% BW [P =.001] vs. 14.4% +/- 7.4% BW [P = .005]). Conclusion: Rotator cuff repair, especially in conjunction with glenosphere lateralization, produces an antagonistic effect that increases deltoid and joint loading. The long-term effects of this remain unknown; however, combining these factors may prove undesirable. Humeral lateralization improves joint compression through deltoid wrapping and increases the deltoid's mechanical advantage, and therefore, could be used in place of rotator cuff repair, thus avoiding its complications. (C) 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1600
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after prior contralateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with bilateral primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff
    Lacie M. Turnbull
    Kevin A. Hao
    Victoria E. Bindi
    Jonathan O. Wright
    Thomas W. Wright
    Kevin W. Farmer
    Terrie Vasilopoulos
    Aimee M. Struk
    Bradley S. Schoch
    Joseph J. King
    International Orthopaedics, 2024, 48 : 801 - 807
  • [22] Influence of rotator cuff integrity on loading and kinematics before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Pean, Fabien
    Favre, Philippe
    Goksel, Orcun
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 129 (129)
  • [23] Comparison between Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Older Adults with Osteoarthritis without Rotator Cuff Tears
    Kim, Seong Hun
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [24] Comparison of Reverse and Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With an Intact Rotator Cuff and No Previous Surgery
    Friedman, Richard J.
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    Eichinger, Josef Karl
    Neel, Garrett B.
    Boettcher, Marissa L.
    Flurin, Pierre-Henri
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Roche, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (19) : 941 - 948
  • [25] Does having a rotator cuff repair prior to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty influence the outcome?
    Erickson, B. J.
    Ling, D.
    Wong, A.
    Eno, J. J.
    Dines, J. S.
    Dines, D. M.
    Gulotta, L., V
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (01): : 63 - 67
  • [26] Establishing maximum medical improvement following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff deficiency
    Cabarcas, Brandon C.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (09) : 1721 - 1731
  • [27] Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture Versus Rotator Cuff Arthropathy
    Maier II, Stephen P.
    Prabhat, Anjali M.
    Collins, Jamie E.
    von Keudell, Arvind
    Earp, Brandon
    Zhang, Dafang
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2023, 7 (10):
  • [28] Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions
    Rittmeister, M
    Kerschbaumer, F
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [29] Rotator cuff fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy do not impact clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Moverman, Michael A.
    Menendez, Mariano E.
    Hart, Paul-Anthony
    Kirsch, Jacob
    Jawa, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (11) : 2506 - 2513
  • [30] Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff after shoulder arthroplasty
    Werner, A
    Westhoff, B
    Ilg, A
    Wild, A
    Kahl, V
    Krauspe, R
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2003, 24 (06): : 388 - 392