Feasibility and Safety of Early Repeat Transradial Access Within 30 Days of Previous Coronary Angiography and Intervention

被引:9
|
作者
Perez, Alberto E. Barria [1 ]
Costerousse, Olivier [1 ]
Cieza, Tomas [1 ]
Barbeau, Gerald [1 ]
Dery, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Maes, Frederic [1 ]
Rimac, Goran [1 ]
Plourde, Guillaume [1 ]
Poirier, Yann [1 ]
Carrier, Marc-Antoine [1 ]
Bertrand, Olivier F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Laval Univ, Quebec Heart Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2017年 / 120卷 / 08期
关键词
RADIAL ARTERY-OCCLUSION; CATHETERIZATION; PREVENTION; EFFICACY; FAILURE; PROPHET; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Transradial approach (TRA) is the default access site for diagnostic angiography and intervention in many centers. Repeat ipsilateral radial artery access late after index procedure has been associated with failures. It is unknown. whether early. (<= 30 days) and very early (<24 hours) repeat radial access is technically feasible and safe. Study population consisted of consecutive patients undergoing repeat (>= 2) procedures within 30 days in a high volume TEA center. Transradial access failure and resulting feinoral approach was categorized as primary (no repeat attempt)-or secondary (crossover). Timing of repeat access and reasons for failure were recorded. From November 2012 to December 2014, repeat catheterization by TRA was performed twice in 573 of 626 patients (92%) (median delay 4 [2 to 9] days), 3 times in 29 of 38 (76%) patients (median delay 15 [5 to 26] days), and 4 times in 1 patient within 21 days. When repeat catheterization occurred during the first 24 hours following the index procedure, 53% and 75% of patients had second and third procedures using the same ipsilateral radial artery, respectively. Primary radial failure occurred in 5.8% for second attempt and 13% for a third attempt, whereas crossovers were noted in 2.7% and 2.6%, respectively. Main reasons for failed re-access of ipsilateral radial artery were related either to operator's reluctance to repeat attempt (primary failure) or to issues with puncture site (crossover). In a high-volume TRA center, patients who required repeat catheterization within 24 hours and within the first 30 days had the same radial artery re-accessed in the majority of cases. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1271
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Japanese multicenter experience
    Yukio Mizuguchi
    Takuya Izumikawa
    Sho Hashimoto
    Takeshi Yamada
    Norimasa Taniguchi
    Shunsuke Nakajima
    Tetsuya Hata
    Akihiko Takahashi
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2020, 35 : 162 - 167
  • [42] Safety and efficacy of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in patients older than 80 years:from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry
    Hoyoun Won
    Wang Soo Lee
    SangWook Kim
    Byung Ryul Cho
    Young Jin Youn
    YoungHyo Lim
    MinHo Lee
    JaeHwan Lee
    SeungWoon Rha
    Korea Transradial Coronary InterventionKOTRIProspective Registry Investigators
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2017, 14 (02) : 81 - 86
  • [43] Feasibility and safety of concomitant left internal mammary arteriography at the setting of the right transradial coronary angiography
    Cha, KS
    Kim, MH
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 56 (02) : 188 - 195
  • [44] Efficacy and Safety of "Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography" with Right Transradial Access versus Left Transradial Access and Femoral Access: a Retrospective Comparative Study
    Balaban, Yakup
    Akbas, Mustafa Haluk
    Akbas, Merih Leventyuz
    Ozerdem, Ali
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 34 (01) : 48 - 56
  • [45] Distal Transradial Access in Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Liang, Chendi
    Han, Qinghua
    Jia, Yongping
    Fan, Chunyu
    Qin, Gang
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 2021
  • [46] Feasibility And Safety Of A Novel Sheath less System During Routine Percutaneous Transradial Coronary Angiography
    Gadkar, Narayan
    D'Souza, Ryan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 107 (8A): : 118A - 118A
  • [47] Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Meta-Analysis
    Hamandi, Mohanad
    Saad, Marwan
    Hasan, Rimsha
    Megaly, Michael
    Abbott, J. Dawn
    Dib, Chad
    Szerlip, Molly
    Potluri, Srinivasa
    Lotfi, Amir
    Kiemeneij, Ferdinand
    Al-Azizi, Karim M.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (10) : 1209 - 1213
  • [48] Feasibility and Safety of Distal Radial Approach in Emergency Coronary Angiography and Intervention
    Mizuguchi, Yukio
    Hashimoto, Sho
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Taniguchi, Norimasa
    Hata, Tetsuya
    Nakajima, Shunsuke
    Takahashi, Akihiko
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (04) : S5 - S5
  • [49] Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography: a single operator's experience of its feasibility and safety
    Lee, DH
    Ahn, JH
    Jeong, SS
    Eo, KS
    Park, MS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 77 (922): : 831 - 838
  • [50] Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience
    Xie, Lianna
    Wei, Xianjing
    Xie, Zezhou
    Jia, Shengying
    Xu, Siwei
    Wang, Kaijun
    CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 146 (05) : 531 - 537