Procedure for Selecting Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Manufacturing

被引：0

作者：

Kibira, Deogratias ^{[1
]}

Brundage, Michael ^{[2
]}

Feng, Shaw ^{[2
]}

Morris, K. C. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Morgan State Univ, Baltimore, MD 21239 USA

[2] NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA

来源：

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 12TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2017, VOL 4 | 2017年

关键词：

KPI Criteria; Value Function; KPI Selection; Sustainable Manufacturing; SYSTEMS; CATEGORIZATION; IMPROVEMENT; METRICS;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

The need for an open, inclusive, and neutral procedure in selecting key performance indicators (KPIs) for sustainable manufacturing has been increasing. The reason is that manufacturers seek to determine what to measure in order to improve environmental sustainability of their products and manufacturing processes. A difficulty arises in understanding and selecting specific indicators from a large number of standalone indicator sets available. This paper presents a procedure for individual manufacturers to select KPIs for measuring, monitoring and " improving environmental aspects of manufacturing processes. The procedure is the basis for a guideline, being proposed for standardization within ASTM International. That guide can be used for (1) identifying candidate KPIs from existing sources, (2) defining new candidate KPIs, (3) selecting appropriate KPIs based on KPI criteria, and (4) composing the selected KPIs with assigned weights into a set. The paper explains how the developed procedure complements existing indicator sets and sustainability-measurement approaches at the manufacturing process level.

引用

下载

页数：8

共 50 条

[41] DISCUSSION OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR PACKAGING DESIGN - THE PERSPECTIVE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Li, Nana
Halabi, Khairun Nisa Mustaffa
Ren, Lu Jun
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2022, 23 (06): : 2468 - 2473
[42] Challenges of Uncertainty in Sustainable Strategy Development: Reconsidering the Key Performance Indicators
Medne, Aija
Lapina, Inga
Zeps, Arturs
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (02)
[43] EMPIRICAL STUDY REGARDING KEY INDICATORS CORRELATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE BUDGETING
Cimpoeru, Violeta
Radu, Maria
Cimpoeru, Valentin
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AMIS 2011), 6TH EDITION, 2011, : 1075 - 1088
[44] ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE REPORTING
Kocmanova, Alena
Nemecek, Petr
Docekalova, Marie
7TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2012, 2012, : 655 - 662
[45] An Investigation of Indicators for Measuring Sustainable Manufacturing
Fan, Chengcheng
Carrell, John D.
Zhang, Hong-Chao
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2010,
[46] KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Chambers, David W.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 144 (03): : 242 - +
[47] Selecting indicators for strategic performance management
Marsden, Greg
Kelly, Charlotte
Snell, Carolyn
MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC POLICY 2006, 2006, (1956): : 21 - 29
[48] Analysis of key performance indicators in a manufacturing plant via fuzzy cognitive maps
Baykasoglu, Adil
Atalay, Zehra Nur
Golcuk, Ilker
2019 INNOVATIONS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (ASYU), 2019, : 526 - 529
[49] Evaluation of key performance indicators for sustainability assessment in automotive component manufacturing organization
Swarnakar, Vikas
Singh, A. R.
Tiwari, Anil Kr
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 47 : 5755 - 5759
[50] Evaluating key performance indicators of leagile manufacturing using fuzzy TISM approach
Virmani N.
Saha R.
Sahai R.
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2018, 9 (2) : 427 - 439

← 1 2 3 4 5 →