Atmospheric predictability at synoptic versus cloud-resolving scales

被引:145
|
作者
Hohenegger, Cathy [1 ]
Schaer, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-88-11-1783
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The limited atmospheric predictability has been addressed by the development of ensemble prediction systems (EPS) that are now routinely applied for medium-range synoptic-scale numerical weather prediction (NWP). With the increase of computational power, interest is growing in the design of high-resolution (cloud resolving) NWP models and their associated short-range EPS. This development raises a series of fundamental questions, espe cially concerning the type of error growth and the validity of the tangent-linear approximation. To address these issues, a comparison between perturbed medium-range (10 day) synoptic-scale integrations (taken from the operational ECMWF EPS with a horizontal resolution of about 80 km) and short-range (1 day) high-resolution simulations (based on the Lokal Modell of the Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling with a grid spacing of 2.2 km) is conducted. The differences between the two systems are interpreted in a nondimensional sense and illustrated with the help of the Lorenz attractor. Typical asymptotic perturbation-doubling times of cloud-resolving and synoptic-scale simulations amount to about 4 and 40 h, respectively, and are primarily related to convective and baro- clinic instability. Thus, in terms of growth rates, integrating a 1-day :1 Cloud- re solving forecast may be seen as equivalent to performing a 10-day synoptic-scale simulation. However, analysis of the prevailing linearity reveals that the two systems are fundamentally different in the following sense: the tangent-linear approximation breaks down at 1. 5 h for cloud resolving against 54 h for synoptic-scale forecasts. In terms of nonlinearity, a 10-day synoptic-scale integration thus corresponds to a very short cloud-resolving simulation of merely;about 7 h. The higher degree of nonlinearity raises questions concerning the direct application of standard synoptic-scale forecasting methodologies (e.g., optimal perturbations, 4D variational data assimilation, or targeted observations) to 1-day cloud-resolving forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1783 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spectral cumulus parameterization based on cloud-resolving model
    Yuya Baba
    Climate Dynamics, 2019, 52 : 309 - 334
  • [42] Cloud-resolving simulations of mercury scavenging and deposition in thunderstorms
    Nair, U. S.
    Wu, Y.
    Holmes, C. D.
    Ter Schure, A.
    Kallos, G.
    Walters, J. T.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2013, 13 (19) : 10143 - 10157
  • [43] Data Assimilation of Cloud-Affected Radiances in a Cloud-Resolving Model
    Polkinghorne, Rosanne
    Vukicevic, Tomislava
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2011, 139 (03) : 755 - 773
  • [44] Cloud seeding impact on precipitation as revealed by cloud-resolving mesoscale model
    M. Ćurić
    D. Janc
    V. Vučković
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2007, 95 : 179 - 193
  • [45] Spectral cumulus parameterization based on cloud-resolving model
    Baba, Yuya
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 52 (1-2) : 309 - 334
  • [46] Validation of Cloud-Resolving Model Background Data for Cloud Data Assimilation
    Polkinghorne, Rosanne
    Vukicevic, Tomislava
    Evans, K. Franklin
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2010, 138 (03) : 781 - 795
  • [47] A review of cloud-resolving model studies of convective processes
    Wu, Xiaoqing
    Li, Xiaofan
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2008, 25 (02) : 202 - 212
  • [48] Sensitivity studies of developing convection in a cloud-resolving model
    Petch, JC
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 132 (615) : 345 - 358
  • [49] An intercomparison of cloud-resolving models with the atmospheric radiation measurement summer 1997 intensive observation period data
    Xu, KM
    Cederwall, RT
    Donner, LJ
    Grabowski, WW
    Guichard, F
    Johnson, DE
    Khairoutdinov, M
    Krueger, SK
    Petch, JC
    Randall, DA
    Seman, CJ
    Tao, WK
    Wang, DH
    Xie, SC
    Yio, JJ
    Zhang, MH
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 128 (580) : 593 - 624
  • [50] A review of cloud-resolving model studies of convective processes
    Xiaoqing Wu
    Xiaofan Li
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2008, 25 : 202 - 212