Atmospheric predictability at synoptic versus cloud-resolving scales

被引:145
|
作者
Hohenegger, Cathy [1 ]
Schaer, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Atmospher & Climate Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-88-11-1783
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The limited atmospheric predictability has been addressed by the development of ensemble prediction systems (EPS) that are now routinely applied for medium-range synoptic-scale numerical weather prediction (NWP). With the increase of computational power, interest is growing in the design of high-resolution (cloud resolving) NWP models and their associated short-range EPS. This development raises a series of fundamental questions, espe cially concerning the type of error growth and the validity of the tangent-linear approximation. To address these issues, a comparison between perturbed medium-range (10 day) synoptic-scale integrations (taken from the operational ECMWF EPS with a horizontal resolution of about 80 km) and short-range (1 day) high-resolution simulations (based on the Lokal Modell of the Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling with a grid spacing of 2.2 km) is conducted. The differences between the two systems are interpreted in a nondimensional sense and illustrated with the help of the Lorenz attractor. Typical asymptotic perturbation-doubling times of cloud-resolving and synoptic-scale simulations amount to about 4 and 40 h, respectively, and are primarily related to convective and baro- clinic instability. Thus, in terms of growth rates, integrating a 1-day :1 Cloud- re solving forecast may be seen as equivalent to performing a 10-day synoptic-scale simulation. However, analysis of the prevailing linearity reveals that the two systems are fundamentally different in the following sense: the tangent-linear approximation breaks down at 1. 5 h for cloud resolving against 54 h for synoptic-scale forecasts. In terms of nonlinearity, a 10-day synoptic-scale integration thus corresponds to a very short cloud-resolving simulation of merely;about 7 h. The higher degree of nonlinearity raises questions concerning the direct application of standard synoptic-scale forecasting methodologies (e.g., optimal perturbations, 4D variational data assimilation, or targeted observations) to 1-day cloud-resolving forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:1783 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictability of precipitation in a cloud-resolving model
    Walser, A
    Lüthi, D
    Schär, C
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2004, 132 (02) : 560 - 577
  • [2] Predictability mysteries in cloud-resolving models
    Hohenegger, Cathy
    Luethi, Daniel
    Schaer, Christoph
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (08) : 2095 - 2107
  • [3] Online versus offline air quality modeling on cloud-resolving scales
    Grell, GA
    Knoche, R
    Peckham, SE
    McKeen, SA
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (16) : L161171 - 4
  • [4] Predictability and error growth dynamics in cloud-resolving models
    Hohenegger, Cathy
    Schaer, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2007, 64 (12) : 4467 - 4478
  • [5] Towards climate simulations at cloud-resolving scales
    Hohenegger, Cathy
    Brockhaus, Peter
    Schaer, Christoph
    METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2008, 17 (04) : 383 - 394
  • [6] The predictability of deep convection in cloud-resolving simulations overland
    Petch, JC
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 130 (604) : 3173 - 3187
  • [7] The Effect of Error Growth and Propagation on the Predictability of Quantitative Precipitation in a Cloud-Resolving Model
    Xu Jian-Yu
    Zhong Qing
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2009, 2 (02) : 79 - 84
  • [9] Global Cloud-Resolving Models
    Satoh, Masaki
    Stevens, Bjorn
    Judt, Falko
    Khairoutdinov, Marat
    Lin, Shian-Jiann
    Putman, William M.
    Duben, Peter
    CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTS, 2019, 5 (03) : 172 - 184
  • [10] Global Cloud-Resolving Models
    Masaki Satoh
    Bjorn Stevens
    Falko Judt
    Marat Khairoutdinov
    Shian-Jiann Lin
    William M. Putman
    Peter Düben
    Current Climate Change Reports, 2019, 5 : 172 - 184