共 50 条
A Comparison of Physical Activity Between Home-Based and Centre-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomised Controlled Secondary Analysis
被引:5
|作者:
Horton, Elizabeth J.
[1
]
Ruksenaite, Justina
[2
]
Mitchell, Katy
[3
]
Sewell, Louise
[1
]
Newby, Christopher
[4
]
Singh, Sally J.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Coventry Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Sch Life Sci, Coventry, England
[2] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Dept Resp Med, Leicester, England
[3] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Ctr Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Leicester, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
来源:
关键词:
pulmonary rehabilitation;
physical activity;
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD);
exercise;
step count;
sedentary time;
COPD;
MORTALITY;
PROGRAM;
DISEASE;
PEOPLE;
D O I:
10.3389/fresc.2021.743441
中图分类号:
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号:
100215 ;
摘要:
Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a highly effective intervention for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Physical activity (PA) has been shown to increase after a centre-based programme, yet it is not clear if a home-based programme can offer the same benefit. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of home-based PR compared with the centre-based PR on the PA levels post 7 weeks of PR and 6 months follow-up. Method: In this study, 51 participants with COPD, of them, 36 (71%) men completed physical activity monitoring with a SenseWear Armband, at three time points (baseline, 7 weeks, and 6 months). The participants were randomly assigned to either centre-based supervised PR (n = 25; 69 +/- 6 years; FEV1 55 +/- 20% predicted) or home-based PR (n = 26; 68 +/- 7 years; FEV1 42 +/- 19% predicted) programmes lasting 7 weeks. The home-based programme includes one hospital visit, a self-management manual, and two telephone calls. The PA was measured as step count, time in moderate PA (3-6 metabolic equivalent of tasks [METs]) in bouts of more than 10min and sedentary time (<2 METs). Results: Home-based PR increased step count significantlymore than the centre-based PR after 7 weeks (mean difference 1,463 steps: 95% CI 280-2,645, p = 0.02). There was no difference in time spent in moderate PA was observed (mean difference 62 min: 95% CI -56 to 248, p = 0.24). Sedentary behaviour was also significantly different between the centre and home-based groups. The home group spent 52min less time sedentary compared with the centre-based (CI -106 to 2, p = 0.039). However, after 6 months, the step count and time spent in moderate PA returned to baseline in both the groups. Conclusion: This study provides an important insight into the role of home-based PR which has the potential to be offered as an alternative to the centre-based PR. Understanding who may best respond from the centre or home-based PR warrants further exploration and how to maintain these initial benefits for the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文