Diagnostic Performance of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Prediction of Grading of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Zong, Rui Long [1 ]
Geng, Li [2 ]
Wang, Xiaohong [3 ]
Xie, Daohai [3 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xuzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiol, 199 Jiefang South Rd, Xuzhou 22100, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
diffusion-weighted imaging; meta-analysis; pancreatic endocrine tumors; sensitivity; specificity; AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR; IMAGING FEATURES; MR; NEOPLASMS; CT;
D O I
10.1097/MPA.0000000000001212
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the World Health Organization grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Methods The MEDLINE, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant original articles investigating the ADC value in predicting the grade of pNETs. The pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated by using random effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed to discover heterogeneity effects. Results Nine studies with 386 patients met our inclusion criteria. For identifying G1 from G2/3, the pooled SE, SP, PLR, NLR, and area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.73-0.91), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.72-0.94), 6.3 (95% CI, 2.7-14.6), 0.19 (95% CI, 0.10-0.34), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94), respectively. The summary estimates for ADC in distinguishing G3 from G1/2 were as follows: SE, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.66-0.99); SP, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95); PLR, 11.1 (95% CI, 6.6-18.6); NLR, 0.08 (95% CI, 0.01-0.45); and area under the curve, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96). Conclusions Diffusion-weighted imaging is a reliable tool for predicting the grade of pNETs, especially for G3. Moreover, the combination of 3.0-T device and higher b value can slightly help improve SE and SP.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 160
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic performance of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis metrics for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Xu, Fan
    Liang, Ying-ying
    Guo, Yuan
    Liang, Zhi-ping
    Wu, Mei
    Chen, Song
    Zeng, Xu-wen
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (09) : 1165 - 1175
  • [22] Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cPNETs): a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series
    Hurtado-Pardo, Luis
    Cienfuegos, Javier A.
    Ruiz-Canela, Miguel
    Panadero, Pablo
    Benito, Alberto
    Luis Hernandez-Lizoain, Jose
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2017, 109 (11) : 778 - 786
  • [23] Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion models parameters and mono-exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nematollahi, Hamide
    Maracy, Mohammad Reza
    Moslehi, Masoud
    Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Daryoush
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 29 (01):
  • [24] Difference in Clinical Behavior of the Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas versus Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs) - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tahir, Muhammad
    Viswanathan, Prakash
    Ravikumar, Naveen Prasad Gopalakrishnan
    Miller, Lorin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S56 - S57
  • [25] Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: correlation between histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and tumor grade
    Sousa Pereira, Jose Antonio
    Rosado, Elsa
    Bali, Maria
    Metens, Thierry
    Chao, Shih-Li
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (08): : 3122 - 3128
  • [26] Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: correlation between histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps and tumor grade
    Jose Antonio Sousa Pereira
    Elsa Rosado
    Maria Bali
    Thierry Metens
    Shih-Li Chao
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 3122 - 3128
  • [27] Can Diffusion Tensor Imaging Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Diagnose Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Evans, Adam G.
    Morgan, Maurice D.
    Aiken, Benjamin A.
    Assi, Patrick E.
    Joseph, Jeremy T.
    Kesayan, Tigran
    Mioton, Lauren M.
    Esteve, Isaac V. M.
    Hill, J. Bradford
    Thayer, Wesley P.
    Al Kassis, Salam
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2023, 18 (1_SUPPL): : 91S - 99S
  • [28] Meningioma grading via diagnostic imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Upreti, Tushar
    Dube, Sheen
    Pareek, Vibhay
    Sinha, Namita
    Shankar, Jai
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024, 66 (08) : 1301 - 1310
  • [29] Diagnostic Value of Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Prediction of Neuroepithelial Tumor Grading
    Chen, Zhiye
    Ma, Lin
    Lou, Xin
    Zhou, Zhenhong
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (06) : 1331 - 1338
  • [30] Survival prediction using apparent diffusion coefficient values in recurrent glioblastoma under bevacizumab treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Dong
    Li, Zhangyu
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (04): : 270 - 274