A Subatomic Proof System for Decision Trees

被引:0
|
作者
Barrett, Chris [1 ]
Guglielmi, Alessio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Comp Sci, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Deep inference; open deduction; subatomic logic; cut elimination; Statman tautologies; CALCULUS;
D O I
10.1145/3545116
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
We design a proof system for propositional classical logic that integrates two languages for Boolean functions: standard conjunction-disjunction-negation and binary decision trees. We give two reasons to do so. The first is proof-theoretical naturalness: The system consists of all and only the inference rules generated by the single, simple, linear scheme of the recently introduced subatomic logic. Thanks to this regularity, cuts are eliminated via a natural construction. The second reason is that the system generates efficient proofs. Indeed, we showthat a certain class of tautologies due to Statman, which cannot have better than exponential cut-free proofs in the sequent calculus, have polynomial cut-free proofs in our system. We achieve this by using the same construction that we use for cut elimination. In summary, by expanding the language of propositional logic, we make its proof theory more regular and generate more proofs, some of which are very efficient. That design is made possible by considering atoms as superpositions of their truth values, which are connected by self-dual, non-commutative connectives. A proof can then be projected via each atom into two proofs, one for each truth value, without a need for cuts. Those projections are semantically natural and are at the heart of the constructions in this article. To accommodate self-dual non-commutativity, we compose proofs in deep inference.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Medical Price Prediction System using Hierarchical Decision Trees
    Tike, Anuja
    Tavarageri, Sanket
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2017, : 3904 - 3913
  • [32] A hybrid sales forecasting system based on clustering and decision trees
    Thomassey, Sebastien
    Fiordaliso, Antonio
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (01) : 408 - 421
  • [33] Yggdrasil: An Optimized System for Training Deep Decision Trees at Scale
    Abuzaid, Firas
    Bradley, Joseph
    Liang, Feynman
    Feng, Andrew
    Yang, Lee
    Zaharia, Matei
    Talwalkar, Ameet
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [34] A KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM FOR CRITIQUING MEDICAL DECISION TREES
    ECKMAN, MH
    WELLMAN, MP
    MARSHALL, SL
    FLEMING, C
    SONNENBERG, FA
    PAUKER, SG
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1987, 7 (04) : 287 - 287
  • [35] DECISION TREES AND DECISION-MAKING
    QUINLAN, JR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1990, 20 (02): : 339 - 346
  • [36] Decision forests with oblique decision trees
    Tan, Peter J.
    Dowe, David L.
    MICAI 2006: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4293 : 593 - +
  • [37] DECISION TREES FOR DECISION-MAKING
    MAGEE, JF
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1964, 42 (04) : 126 - 138
  • [38] The proof of a conjecture on the comparison of the energies of trees
    Hai-Ying Shan
    Jia-Yu Shao
    Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 2012, 50 : 2637 - 2647
  • [39] Proof of a conjecture on the ε-spectral radius of trees
    Li, Jianping
    Qiu, Leshi
    Zhang, Jianbin
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2023, 8 (02): : 4363 - 4371
  • [40] Peirce and Proof: A View from the Trees
    Beisecker, Dave
    DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION AND INFERENCE, DIAGRAMS 2018, 2018, 10871 : 537 - 548