Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures

被引:13
|
作者
Shah, Roshan P. [1 ]
Plummer, Darren R. [1 ]
Moric, Mario [1 ]
Sporer, Scott M. [1 ,2 ]
Levine, Brett R. [1 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Cent Dupage Hosp, Joint Replacement Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Winfield, IL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2016年 / 31卷 / 09期
关键词
periprosthetic joint infection; periprosthetic fracture; diagnosis; synovial fluid; aspiration; PJI; HIP; REVISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.045
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection is particularly challenging in patients with periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of commonly used diagnostic tests for periprosthetic joint infection in patients with a periprosthetic fracture. Methods: Of 121 patients treated with a periprosthetic fracture (97 hips, 24 knees, mean age: 72.9), 14 (11.6%) met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for infection. Diagnostic variables were evaluated using logistic regression models for the prediction of infection and receiver operating characteristics curves. Results: The synovial white blood cell (WBC) count and differential were the best diagnostic tests, with good test performance (area under the curve, 84%) and optimal cutoffs of 2707 WBC/uL and 77% polymorphonuclear cells. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were found to have overall lower test performance but remained relatively sensitive at standard cutoff values of 30 mm/h and 10 mg/L, respectively. Conclusion: The synovial fluid WBC count and differential are the best tests with optimal cutoff values that are similar to those used for patients without a periprosthetic fracture. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S140 / S143
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Campbell, P
    McWilliams, TG
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDICS, 2002, 16 (02): : 126 - 132
  • [42] MANAGEMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES
    BOOTH, RE
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1994, 17 (09) : 845 - 847
  • [43] Periprosthetic Fractures of the Shoulder
    Henry, Patrick D. G.
    Endrizzi, Donald P.
    McKee, Michael D.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 28 (03) : 238 - 244
  • [44] Periprosthetic fractures of the knee
    Backstein, David
    Safir, Oleg
    Gross, Allan
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (04): : 45 - 49
  • [45] Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip
    Weissinger, M.
    Helmreich, C.
    Poell, G.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2009, 76 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [46] PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES
    Osterhoff, G.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (SUPPL 1) : S58 - S58
  • [47] Periprosthetic fractures of the femur
    Schmidt, AH
    Kyle, RF
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 33 (01) : 143 - +
  • [48] Periprosthetic acetabular fractures
    Francesco Benazzo
    Mario Formagnana
    Marco Bargagliotti
    Loris Perticarini
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1959 - 1963
  • [49] Periprosthetic knee fractures
    Mittlmeier, T.
    Beck, M.
    Bosch, U.
    Wichelhaus, A.
    ORTHOPADE, 2016, 45 (01): : 54 - 64
  • [50] Periprosthetic knee fractures
    Parvizi, Javad
    Jain, Nikhil
    Schmidt, Andrew H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2008, 22 (09) : 663 - 671