Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures

被引:13
|
作者
Shah, Roshan P. [1 ]
Plummer, Darren R. [1 ]
Moric, Mario [1 ]
Sporer, Scott M. [1 ,2 ]
Levine, Brett R. [1 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Cent Dupage Hosp, Joint Replacement Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Winfield, IL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2016年 / 31卷 / 09期
关键词
periprosthetic joint infection; periprosthetic fracture; diagnosis; synovial fluid; aspiration; PJI; HIP; REVISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.045
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection is particularly challenging in patients with periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of commonly used diagnostic tests for periprosthetic joint infection in patients with a periprosthetic fracture. Methods: Of 121 patients treated with a periprosthetic fracture (97 hips, 24 knees, mean age: 72.9), 14 (11.6%) met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for infection. Diagnostic variables were evaluated using logistic regression models for the prediction of infection and receiver operating characteristics curves. Results: The synovial white blood cell (WBC) count and differential were the best diagnostic tests, with good test performance (area under the curve, 84%) and optimal cutoffs of 2707 WBC/uL and 77% polymorphonuclear cells. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were found to have overall lower test performance but remained relatively sensitive at standard cutoff values of 30 mm/h and 10 mg/L, respectively. Conclusion: The synovial fluid WBC count and differential are the best tests with optimal cutoff values that are similar to those used for patients without a periprosthetic fracture. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S140 / S143
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Periprosthetic Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Total Hip Fractures: Evaluation and Management
    Fernando, Navin
    Yacovelli, Steven
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (20) : 957 - 964
  • [2] Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: And the Winner Is?
    Shahi, Alisina
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Kheir, Michael M.
    Tan, Dean D.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09): : S232 - S235
  • [3] Infection in periprosthetic hip fractures
    Cabral, Rui
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 22 : S79 - S82
  • [4] Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a Scoping Review
    Aaron Gazendam
    Thomas J Wood
    Daniel Tushinski
    Kamal Bali
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2022, 15 : 219 - 229
  • [5] Diagnosing a periprosthetic shoulder infection: A systematic review
    Jauregui, Julio J.
    Tran, Andrew
    Kaveeshwar, Samir
    Nadarajah, Vidushan
    Chaudhri, Moiuz W.
    Henn, R. Frank
    Gilotra, Mohit N.
    Hasan, S. Ashfaq
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 26 : 58 - 66
  • [6] Diagnosing Acute Periprosthetic Infection: An Important Advance
    Giori, Nicholas J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (23):
  • [7] Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a Scoping Review
    Gazendam, Aaron
    Wood, Thomas J.
    Tushinski, Daniel
    Bali, Kamal
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2022, 15 (03) : 219 - 229
  • [8] Culture of periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection
    Li, Cheng
    Ojeda-Thies, Cristina
    Trampuz, Andrej
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [9] Culture of periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection
    Cheng Li
    Cristina Ojeda-Thies
    Andrej Trampuz
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [10] Intraoperative Purulence Is Not Reliable for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Alijanipour, Pouya
    Adeli, Bahar
    Hansen, Erik N.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (08): : 1403 - 1406