Constant current vs. constant power control in AC resistance spot welding

被引:16
|
作者
Zhou Kang [1 ,2 ]
Yao Ping [3 ]
Cai Lilong [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, State Key Lab High Temp Gas Dynam, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Polytech Normal Univ, Coll Electromech Engn, Guangzhou 510635, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Control strategy; Constant current control; Constant power control; Nugget growth; EXPULSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.04.016
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Constant current control (CCC) and constant power control (CPC) are two of the most popular control strategies employed in resistance spot welding (RSW). They have their individual respective advantages; for example, with CCC, it is easy to control energy delivery, while CPC can deliver more heat in particular situations. CPC can be accomplished by means of CCC. The performance of CPC is not as good as that of CCC, because CPC involves more interfering elements. Dynamic resistance is employed to analyze the welding process. Corresponding analysis shows a more reliable welding process can be obtained and the first melting point can be detected earlier when CCC is employed rather than CPC. Though the overall nugget growth trends may show a very small difference when using one strategy versus the other, CCC can provide a larger nugget size because the initial energy allotment is more reasonable and the energy delivery is much steadier. We conducted experiments to validate all of the theoretical analysis. This work can serve to inform actual welding production to obtain a more reliable welding process, enable welders to choose a proper control strategy and help improve energy efficiency in practice. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is there an optimal shape of the defibrillation shock: Constant current vs. pulsed biphasic waveforms?
    Dotsinsky, Ivan
    Mudrov, Tsvetan
    Krasteva, Vessela
    Kostov, Jecho
    International Journal Bioautomation, 2013, 17 (01) : 45 - 56
  • [32] CONSTANT-CURRENT AC SHOCK GENERATOR
    KRAUSMAN, D
    CONDITIONAL REFLEX, 1970, 5 (02) : 126 - 129
  • [33] Modelling electrified interfaces in quantum chemistry: constant charge vs. constant potential
    Benedikt, Udo
    Schneider, Wolfgang B.
    Auer, Alexander A.
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 15 (08) : 2712 - 2724
  • [34] A novel welding inverter power source system with constant current output characteristic based on fuzzy logic control
    Zhang, JH
    Wang, HF
    ICEMS'2001: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES AND SYSTEMS, VOLS I AND II, 2001, : 567 - 570
  • [35] USE OF CONSTANT CURRENT POWER-SUPPLIES IN CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION
    BROWN, LE
    CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1975, 22 (02) : 42 - 44
  • [36] A Study on Constant Current Output Control in Wireless Power Transfer
    Wei, Bin
    Wang, Songcen
    Gao, Chao
    Wu, Xiaokang
    Xu, Jinxing
    Liu, Ying
    Zhou, Fangtong
    Cui, Chao
    2017 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND EXPO, ASIA-PACIFIC (ITEC ASIA-PACIFIC), 2017, : 406 - 409
  • [37] Research on control strategy of constant current charging power supply
    Jiang, Jing
    Pan, Linlin
    Che, Long
    2017 29TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2017, : 4400 - 4405
  • [38] Current Mode Control for Boost Converters With Constant Power Loads
    Li, Yushan
    Vannorsdel, Kevin R.
    Zirger, Art J.
    Norris, Mark
    Maksimovic, Dragan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I-REGULAR PAPERS, 2012, 59 (01) : 198 - 206
  • [39] FREQUENCY RESPONSE OF AC-DC CONVERTOR WITH CONSTANT-CURRENT CONTROL
    CHEUNG, WN
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS-LONDON, 1971, 118 (09): : 1242 - &
  • [40] NEW ac CONSTANT POTENTIAL POWER SOURCE FOR HEAVY PLATE, DEEP GROOVE WELDING.
    Grist, F.J.
    Armstrong, F.W.
    Welding Journal (Miami, Fla), 1980, 59 (06): : 30 - 35