Single dose intravenous propacetamol or intravenous paracetamol for postoperative pain

被引:45
|
作者
Tzortzopoulou, Aikaterini [1 ]
McNicol, Ewan D. [1 ]
Cepeda, M. Soledad [2 ]
Francia, Marie Belle D. [1 ]
Farhat, Tamman [1 ]
Schumann, Roman [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut Res & Dev, Pharmacoepidemiol, Titussville, NJ USA
关键词
CONTROLLED ANALGESIA MORPHINE; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; DICHOTOMOUS OUTCOME MEASURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS; IV PARACETAMOL; PARENTERAL PARACETAMOL; DOUBLE-BLIND; ACETAMINOPHEN; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007126.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is the most commonly prescribed analgesic for the treatment of acute pain. It may be administered orally or intravenously. The efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) formulations of paracetamol, IV paracetamol and IV propacetamol, compared with placebo and other analgesics, is unclear. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of IV formulations of paracetamol for treatment of postoperative pain in both adults and children. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1950 to May 2010), EMBASE (1980 to 2010, Week 18), LILACS (1992 to May 2010) and reference lists of retrieved articles. Selection criteria Randomized, double-blind, placebo-or active-controlled single dose clinical trials of IV propacetamol or IV paracetamol for acute postoperative pain in adults or children. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse event information from the studies. Main results Thirty-six studies (3896 participants) were included. Thirty-seven percent of participants receiving IV propacetamol/paracetamol experienced at least 50% pain relief over four hours compared with 16% of those receiving placebo (number needed to treat to benefit (NNT = 4.0; 95% confidence interval 3.5 to 4.8). The proportion of participants in IV propacetamol/paracetamol groups experiencing at least 50% pain relief diminished over six hours, as reflected in a higher NNT of 5.3 (4.2 to 6.7). Participants receiving IV propacetamol/paracetamol required 30% less opioid over four hours than those receiving placebo. However, this did not translate to a reduction in opioid-induced adverse events. Meta-analysis of efficacy comparisons between IV propacetamol/paracetamol and active comparators (opioids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs)) were either not statistically significant, not clinically significant, or both. Adverse events occurred at similar rates with IV propacetamol or IV paracetamol and placebo. However, pain on infusion occurred more frequently in those receiving IV propacetamol versus placebo (23% versus 1%). Meta-analysis did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between IV propacetamol/paracetamol and active comparators for any adverse event except a reduction in the rate of hypotension versus NSAIDs and a reduction in the rate of gastrointestinal disorders versus opioids. Authors' conclusions A single dose of both IV propacetamol and IV paracetamol provides around four hours of effective analgesia for about 37% of patients with acute postoperative pain. Both formulations are associated with few adverse events, although patients receiving IV propacetamol have a higher incidence of pain on infusion than both placebo and IV paracetamol.
引用
收藏
页数:129
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single Dose Intravenous Paracetamol versus Placebo in Postorthognathic Surgery Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Sumphaongern, Thunshuda
    Jansisyanont, Pornchai
    ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 2024
  • [22] Population pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous paracetamol in children
    Mohammed, B. S.
    Engelhardt, T.
    Cameron, G. A.
    Cameron, L.
    Hawksworth, G. M.
    Hawwa, A. F.
    McElnay, J.
    Helms, P. J.
    McLay, J. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 (05) : 823 - 829
  • [23] The effect of a single intravenous dose of metamizol 2 g, ketorolac 30 mg and propacetamol 1 g on haemodynamic parameters and postoperative pain after heart surgery
    Avellaneda, C
    Gómez, A
    Martos, F
    Rubio, M
    Sarmiento, J
    de la Cuesta, FS
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 17 (02) : 85 - 90
  • [24] Intravenous acetaminophen (paracetamol): Comparable analgesic efficacy, but better local safety than its prodrug, propacetamol, for postoperative pain after third molar surgery
    Moller, PL
    Juhl, GI
    Payen-Champenois, C
    Skoglund, LA
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (01): : 90 - 96
  • [25] Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of paracetamol after intravenous propacetamol in a former preterm infant
    Allegaert, K
    Verbesselt, R
    Devlieger, H
    de Hoon, J
    Tibboel, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 57 (02) : 224 - 225
  • [26] Comparison of the analgesic effects of intravenous paracetamol and lornoxicam in postoperative pain following thyroidectomies
    Arslan, Mustafa
    Cicek, Ramazan
    Celep, Bahadir
    Yilmaz, Huseyin
    Kalender, Hulya Ustun
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2011, 23 (04): : 160 - 166
  • [27] Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults
    Toms, Laurence
    McQuay, Henry J.
    Derry, Sheena
    Moore, R. Andrew
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04):
  • [28] Bioequivalence study comparing a new paracetamol solution for injection and propacetamol after single intravenous infusion in healthy subjects
    Flouvat, B
    Leneveu, A
    Fitoussi, S
    Delhotal-Landes, B
    Gendron, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 42 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [29] Intravenous Tramadol compared to Propacetamol for postoperative analgesia following thyroidectomy.
    Dejonckheere, M
    Desjeux, L
    Deneu, S
    Bierman, D
    Ewalenko, P
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (2S):