Two considerations for the design of a robust optimal smart structure where control energy is expensive.

被引:3
|
作者
Ryall, TG [1 ]
机构
[1] Def Sci & Technol Org, Aeronaut & Maritime Res Lab, Port Melbourne, Vic 3207, Australia
来源
SMART STRUCTURES AND DEVICES | 2001年 / 4235卷
关键词
robust control; minimum energy control; optimal placement; vibrations; piezoceramics;
D O I
10.1117/12.420877
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Large vibrations in structures are normally unwanted due to corresponding large displacements and accelerations. Other deleterious effects may be caused by the large stresses which are coexistent with these large vibrations; resulting in ultimate failure or at the very least a dramatic reduction in the fatigue life of the structure. A possible solution to this problem is to adopt a "smart structures" approach by using piezoceramic actuators in a feedback control loop to reduce these unwanted vibrations. Two distinct problems will be considered here (although distinct they are of equal importance to the whole control system). The first problem is the optimal placement of piezoceramics for a given amount of material so as to obtain "maximum modal controllability". A cantilevered plate is examined as an example. The second problem considered is the design of robust optimal controllers which maximize the damping of the lightest damped mode in the closed loop system. Restricting the position of the poles of the controller to lie within a certain domain effectively limits the bandwidth of the controller and ensures robustness. The non-linear problem of maximizing the minimum damping using only a certain amount of control energy whilst the controller is restricted in the aforementioned way is solved. In the case of expensive control energy which motivates our study it is seen that the results agree with our intuition via some simple examples.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 362
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal robust control design for power system stabilizer
    Chung, C.Y.
    Tse, C.T.
    Wang, K.W.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 1999, 23 (08): : 11 - 15
  • [32] Analysis and robust optimal design of iteration learning control
    Xu, JX
    Tan, Y
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2003, : 3038 - 3043
  • [33] Vibration control and optimal design in frequency domain for two-structure connection control system
    Zhang, J. L.
    Yang, A. Q.
    Ye, W. B.
    Jiang, J. S.
    ISISS '2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 1411 - 1418
  • [34] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR ROBUST CONTROL DESIGN OF SMART MATERIAL SYSTEMS
    McMahan, Jerry A.
    Smith, Ralph C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME CONFERENCE ON SMART MATERIALS, ADAPTIVE STRUCTURES, AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS - 2013, VOL 1, 2014,
  • [35] A level set approach for optimal design of smart energy harvesters
    Chen, Shikui
    Gonella, Stefano
    Chen, Wei
    Liu, Wing Kam
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 199 (37-40) : 2532 - 2543
  • [36] Quantitative robust optimal control system design and flight control application
    Lin, CM
    Ying, CL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 IEEE IECON - 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, CONTROL, AND INSTRUMENTATION, VOLS 1-3, 1996, : 1382 - 1387
  • [37] Green Smart Port Energy System Design: Optimal Sizing
    D'Agostino, F.
    Kaza, D.
    Silvestro, F.
    Conte, F.
    Rrukaj, R.
    Zadeh, M.
    2023 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, PESGM, 2023,
  • [38] Robust multivariable control of a double beam cantilever smart structure
    Scott, R
    Brown, M
    Levesley, M
    SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2003, 12 (05): : 731 - 743
  • [39] Robust H∞ vibration control for smart solar array structure
    Jiang, Jian-Ping
    Li, Dong-Xu
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2011, 17 (04) : 505 - 515
  • [40] A CASCADE STRUCTURE FOR ROBUST-CONTROL DESIGN
    BONIVENTO, C
    NERSISIAN, A
    TONIELLI, A
    ZANASI, R
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1994, 39 (04) : 846 - 849