Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression

被引:256
|
作者
Rades, D
Stalpers, LJA
Veninga, T
Schulte, R
Hoskin, PJ
Obralic, N
Bajrovic, A
Rudat, V
Schwarz, R
Hulshof, MC
Poortmans, P
Schild, SE
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lubeck, Germany
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Dr Bernard Verbeeten Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[6] Mt Vernon Ctr Canc Treatment, Northwood, Middx, England
[7] Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herceg
[8] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.04.754
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To study five radiotherapy (RT) schedules and potential prognostic factors for functional outcome in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patients and Methods One thousand three hundred four patients who were irradiated from January 1992 to December 2003 were included in this retrospective review. The schedules of 1 X 8 Gy in 1 day (n = 261), 5 X 4 Gy in 1 week (n = 279), 10 X 3 Gy in 2 weeks (n = 274), 15 X 2.5 Gy in 3 weeks (n = 233), and 20 X 2 Gy in 4 weeks (n = 257) were compared for motor function, ambulatory status, and in-field recurrences. The following potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, sex, performance status, histology, number of involved vertebra, interval from cancer diagnosis to MSCC, pretreatment ambulatory status, and time of developing motor deficits before RT. A multivariate analysis was performed with the ordered logit model. Results Motor function improved in 26 % (1 X 8 Gy), 28 % (5 X 4 Gy), 27 % (10 X 3 Gy), 31 % (15 X 2.5 Gy), and 28 % (20 X 2 Gy); and posttreatment ambulatory rates were 69 %, 68 %, 63 %, 66 %, and 74 % (P = .578), respectively. On multivariate analysis, age, performance status, primary tumor, involved vertebra, interval from cancer diagnosis to MSCC, pretreatment ambulatory status, and time of developing motor deficits were significantly associated with functional outcome, whereas the RT schedule was not. Acute toxicity was mild, and late toxicity was not observed. In-field recurrence rates at 2 years were 24 % (1 x 8 Gy), 26 % (5 x 4 Gy), 14 % (10 X 3 Gy), 9 % (15 X 2.5 Gy), and 7 % (20 x 2 Gy) (P < .001). Neither the difference between 1 x 8 Gy and 5 X 4 Gy (P = .44) nor between 10 X 3 Gy, 15 X 2.5 Gy, and 20 X 2 Gy (P = .71) was significant. Conclusion The five RT schedules provided similar functional outcome. The three more protracted schedules seemed to result in fewer in-field recurrences. To minimize treatment time, the following two schedules are recommended: 1 X 8 Gy for patients with poor predicted survival and 10 X 3 Gy for other patients. Results should be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial. (c) 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3366 / 3375
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression
    Mavrogenis, Andreas F.
    Pneumaticos, Spyridon
    Sapkas, George S.
    Papagelopoulos, Panayiotis J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 32 (06) : 431 - 439
  • [32] Management of metastatic spinal cord compression
    Shiue, Kevin
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Chow, Edward
    Lutz, Stephen T.
    Chang, Eric L.
    Mayr, Nina A.
    Wang, Jian Z.
    Cavaliere, Robert
    Mendel, Ehud
    Lo, Simon S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2010, 10 (05) : 697 - 708
  • [33] Management of metastatic spinal cord compression
    Maranzano, E
    Trippa, F
    Chirico, L
    Basagni, ML
    Rossi, R
    TUMORI, 2003, 89 (05) : 469 - 475
  • [34] Agreement in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
    Arana, Estanislao
    Kovacs, Francisco M.
    Royuela, Ana
    Asenjo, Beatriz
    Perez-Ramirez, Ursula
    Zamora, Javier
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2016, 14 (01): : 70 - +
  • [35] Audit of metastatic spinal cord compression
    Cole, A.
    O'Hare, J.
    Harpur, K.
    O'Brien, C.
    Evans, N.
    Finlay, P.
    Clarke, J.
    McAleese, J.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 : S1 - S1
  • [36] Prognostic Factors of Ambulatory Status for Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Yong-Heng
    Hu, Yong-Cheng
    Yang, Xiong-Gang
    Lun, Deng-Xing
    Wang, Feng
    Yang, Li
    Zhang, Hao
    Feng, Jiang-Tao
    Hua, Kun-Chi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 : E278 - E290
  • [37] Prognostic factors for survival and ambulatory status at 8 weeks with metastatic spinal cord compression in the SCORAD randomised trial
    Hoskin, Peter J.
    Hopkins, Kirsten
    Misra, Vivek
    Holt, Tanya
    McMenemin, Rhona
    McKinna, Fiona
    Madhavan, Krishnaswamy
    Bates, Andrew
    O'Rourke, Noelle
    Lester, Jason F.
    Sevitt, Tim
    Roos, Daniel
    Brown, Gillian
    Thomas, Sharon Shibu
    Forsyth, Sharon
    Reczko, Krystyna
    Hackshaw, Allan
    O'Hara, Catherine
    Lopes, Andre
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 173 : 77 - 83
  • [38] Prognostic factors for functional outcome and survival after reirradiation for in-field recurrences of metastatic spinal cord compression
    Rades, Dirk
    Rudat, Volker
    Veninga, Theo
    Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
    Hoskin, Peter J.
    Schild, Steven E.
    CANCER, 2008, 113 (05) : 1090 - 1096
  • [39] Factors that Delay Treatment of Symptomatic Metastatic Extradural Spinal Cord Compression
    Tsukada, Yoichiro
    Nakamura, Naoki
    Ohde, Sachiko
    Akahane, Keiko
    Sekiguchi, Kenji
    Terahara, Atsuro
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 18 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [40] Spinal cord compression in prostate cancer: treatment outcome and prognostic factors
    Huddart, RA
    Rajan, B
    Law, M
    Meyer, L
    Dearnaley, DP
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 44 (03) : 229 - 236