Evaluation of five radiation schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression

被引:256
|
作者
Rades, D
Stalpers, LJA
Veninga, T
Schulte, R
Hoskin, PJ
Obralic, N
Bajrovic, A
Rudat, V
Schwarz, R
Hulshof, MC
Poortmans, P
Schild, SE
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Radiat Oncol, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lubeck, Germany
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Dr Bernard Verbeeten Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[6] Mt Vernon Ctr Canc Treatment, Northwood, Middx, England
[7] Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herceg
[8] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.04.754
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To study five radiotherapy (RT) schedules and potential prognostic factors for functional outcome in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patients and Methods One thousand three hundred four patients who were irradiated from January 1992 to December 2003 were included in this retrospective review. The schedules of 1 X 8 Gy in 1 day (n = 261), 5 X 4 Gy in 1 week (n = 279), 10 X 3 Gy in 2 weeks (n = 274), 15 X 2.5 Gy in 3 weeks (n = 233), and 20 X 2 Gy in 4 weeks (n = 257) were compared for motor function, ambulatory status, and in-field recurrences. The following potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, sex, performance status, histology, number of involved vertebra, interval from cancer diagnosis to MSCC, pretreatment ambulatory status, and time of developing motor deficits before RT. A multivariate analysis was performed with the ordered logit model. Results Motor function improved in 26 % (1 X 8 Gy), 28 % (5 X 4 Gy), 27 % (10 X 3 Gy), 31 % (15 X 2.5 Gy), and 28 % (20 X 2 Gy); and posttreatment ambulatory rates were 69 %, 68 %, 63 %, 66 %, and 74 % (P = .578), respectively. On multivariate analysis, age, performance status, primary tumor, involved vertebra, interval from cancer diagnosis to MSCC, pretreatment ambulatory status, and time of developing motor deficits were significantly associated with functional outcome, whereas the RT schedule was not. Acute toxicity was mild, and late toxicity was not observed. In-field recurrence rates at 2 years were 24 % (1 x 8 Gy), 26 % (5 x 4 Gy), 14 % (10 X 3 Gy), 9 % (15 X 2.5 Gy), and 7 % (20 x 2 Gy) (P < .001). Neither the difference between 1 x 8 Gy and 5 X 4 Gy (P = .44) nor between 10 X 3 Gy, 15 X 2.5 Gy, and 20 X 2 Gy (P = .71) was significant. Conclusion The five RT schedules provided similar functional outcome. The three more protracted schedules seemed to result in fewer in-field recurrences. To minimize treatment time, the following two schedules are recommended: 1 X 8 Gy for patients with poor predicted survival and 10 X 3 Gy for other patients. Results should be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial. (c) 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3366 / 3375
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of 5 radiation (RT) schedules and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) in a series of 1304 patients
    Rades, D
    Stalpers, L
    Veninga, T
    Schulte, R
    Hoskin, P
    Obralic, N
    Bajrovic, A
    Schwarz, R
    Hulshof, M
    Poortmans, P
    Schild, S
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2005, 181 : 38 - 39
  • [2] Evaluation of two dose-fractionation schedules and of prognostic factors in radiotherapy (RT) of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)
    Rades, D
    Fehlauer, F
    Stalpers, LJA
    Hartmann, A
    Wildfang, I
    Schild, SE
    Karstens, JH
    Alberti, W
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S208 - S208
  • [3] A comparison of two different radiation schedules for metastatic spinal cord compression considering a new prognostic factor
    Rades, D
    Karstens, JH
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 (10) : 556 - 561
  • [4] Metastatic spinal cord compression: Incidence, epidemiology and prognostic factors
    Campillo-Recio, D.
    Ariztia, M. Jimeno
    Benitez, G. Flox
    Martinez, J. Marco
    Martin, C. Vicente
    Canteli, S. Plaza
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2019, 219 (07): : 386 - 389
  • [5] Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.: Prognostic factors and results following radiation therapy
    Lövey, G
    Koch, K
    Gademann, G
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2001, 177 (12) : 676 - 679
  • [6] Reassessment of scoring systems and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression
    Tabouret, Emeline
    Cauvin, Cecile
    Fuentes, Stephane
    Esterni, Benjamin
    Adetchessi, Tarek
    Salem, Naji
    Madroszyk, Anne
    Goncalves, Anthony
    Casalonga, Francois
    Gravis, Gwenaelle
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (05): : 944 - 950
  • [7] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF METASTATIC EPIDURAL SPINAL-CORD COMPRESSION
    TANG, SG
    BYFIELD, JE
    SEAGREN, S
    UTLEY, J
    SHARP, T
    QUINOL, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1980, 6 (10): : 1370 - 1370
  • [8] Prognostic Factors for Survival with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in the SCORAD Randomized Trial
    Hoskin, P.
    Lopes, A.
    Hackshaw, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : S36 - S36
  • [9] Prognostic factors for survival in metastatic spinal cord compression - A retrospective study in a rehabilitation setting
    Guo, Y
    Young, B
    Palmer, L
    Mun, Y
    Bruera, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 82 (09) : 665 - 668
  • [10] Prognostic factors for local control and survival after radiotherapy of metastatic spinal cord compression
    Rades, D.
    Schulte, R.
    Fehlauer, F.
    Veninga, T.
    Stalpers, L. J. A.
    Basic, H.
    Bajrovic, A.
    Hoskin, P. J.
    Wildfang, I.
    Rudat, V.
    Engenhart-Cabillic, R.
    Karstens, J. H.
    Schild, S. E.
    Dunst, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S151 - S151