Advocating the rights of people with dementia to contribute to research: Considerations for researchers and ethics committees

被引:13
|
作者
O'Connor, Claire M. C. [1 ,2 ]
Liddle, Jacki [3 ]
O'Reilly, Maria [4 ]
Meyer, Claudia [5 ,6 ]
Cartwright, Jade [7 ]
Chisholm, Marita [8 ]
Conway, Erin [9 ]
Fielding, Elaine [10 ]
Fox, Amanda [10 ]
MacAndrew, Margaret [10 ]
Schnitker, Linda [11 ]
Travers, Catherine [3 ,10 ]
Watson, Karen [12 ]
While, Christine [13 ]
Bail, Kasia [14 ]
机构
[1] HammondCare, Ctr Posit Ageing, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Populat Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Cent Queensland Univ, Bundaberg, Qld, Australia
[5] Bolton Clarke Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Rehabil Ageing & Independent Living Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[8] Rural North West Hlth, Warracknabeal, Vic, Australia
[9] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[10] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[11] Bolton Clarke Res Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[12] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[13] La Trobe Univ, Dementia Training Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[14] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
dementia; ethics committees; informed consent; research; social participation; INFORMED-CONSENT;
D O I
10.1111/ajag.13023
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective Research involving people with dementia is vital to appropriately inform policy and practice decisions affecting this population. As dementia-care researchers, we frequently advocate to Human Research Ethics Committees for the right of people with dementia to choose whether to participate in research. This brief report provides some considerations for researchers and ethics committees. Method Descriptive summary of principles that argue for inclusion of people with dementia in research studies. Results Specifically excluding people living with dementia from research because of perceived cognitive impairment is inappropriate in light of human rights principles and the right to contribute to evidence-based care. Conclusion There is a difference between capacity to provide informed consent and ability to provide perspectives that are valid for each individual. Providing the opportunity for a person with dementia to participate in research and offering support to do this is a matter of human rights.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:309 / 313
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Clinical trials with cannabis medicines—guidance for ethics committees, governance officers and researchers to streamline ethics applications and ensuring patient safety: considerations from the Australian experience
    Jennifer H. Martin
    Courtney Hill
    Anna Walsh
    Daryl Efron
    Kaitlyn Taylor
    Michael Kennedy
    Rachel Galettis
    Paul Lightfoot
    Julie Hanson
    Helen Irving
    Meera Agar
    Judith Lacey
    Trials, 21
  • [22] Rights involve responsibilities for patients - Research ethics committees will approve any protocol unless there are good reasons not to
    Wiseman, TW
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7304): : 108 - 109
  • [23] WORDS OF ADVICE FOR RESEARCHERS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON PEOPLE LIVING WITH DEMENTIA'S EXPERIENCES IN RESEARCH
    Kim, Ha Neul
    Hirsch, Jen
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2023, 7 : 88 - 88
  • [24] Clinical trials with cannabis medicines-guidance for ethics committees, governance officers and researchers to streamline ethics applications and ensuring patient safety: considerations from the Australian experience
    Martin, Jennifer H.
    Hill, Courtney
    Walsh, Anna
    Efron, Daryl
    Taylor, Kaitlyn
    Kennedy, Michael
    Galettis, Rachel
    Lightfoot, Paul
    Hanson, Julie
    Irving, Helen
    Agar, Meera
    Lacey, Judith
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [25] High risk yet invisible: conflicting narratives on social research involving children and young people, and the role of research ethics committees
    Parsons, Sarah
    Abbott, Chris
    McKnight, Lorna
    Davies, Chris
    BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 41 (04) : 709 - 729
  • [26] Insights into the perception that research ethics committees are a barrier to research with seriously ill children: A study of committee minutes and correspondence with researchers studying seriously ill children
    Butler, Ashleigh E.
    Vincent, Katherine
    Bluebond-Langner, Myra
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (03) : 413 - 423
  • [27] The Risk Management Practices of Health Research Ethics Committees May Undermine Citizen Science to Address Basic Human Rights
    Hawe, Penelope
    Rowbotham, Samantha
    Marks, Leah
    Casson, Jonathan
    PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS, 2022, 15 (02) : 194 - 199
  • [28] KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK OF FAMILY CARERS OF PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA
    Reigada, Carla
    Lafferty, Attracta
    Teahan, Aine
    Phelan, Amanda
    O'Sullivan, Liam
    McCarthy, Sandra
    McAuliffe, Eilish
    O'Shea, Diarmuid
    Fealy, Gerard
    AGE AND AGEING, 2017, 46
  • [29] Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members
    Hokke, Stacey
    Hackworth, Naomi J.
    Bennetts, Shannon K.
    Nicholson, Jan M.
    Keyzer, Patrick
    Lucke, Jayne
    Zion, Lawrie
    Crawford, Sharinne B.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2020, 15 (1-2) : 12 - 27
  • [30] Facilitators and barriers to co-research by people with dementia and academic researchers: Findings from a qualitative study
    Waite, Jacob
    Poland, Fiona
    Charlesworth, Georgina
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (04) : 761 - 771