Diagnostic value of Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in detecting high-risk populations for osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men

被引:40
|
作者
Zha, Xiao-Yun [1 ]
Hu, Yu [1 ]
Pang, Xiao-Na [1 ]
Chang, Gui-Lin [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Geriatr, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Chinese men; Osteoporosis; OSTA; Quantitative bone ultrasound; HIP FRACTURE RISK; MINERAL DENSITY; FACILITATE SELECTION; WOMEN; VALIDATION; PREDICTION; INDEX; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00774-014-0587-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate an osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) and their combination in detecting populations at high risk for osteoporosis, and to determine the best cutoff value for the diagnosis of osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men. A group of Chinese men, aged a parts per thousand yen 60 years, recruited from the health checkup population of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, were included. The OSTA index was calculated from age and weight. Bone mineral density (BMD) at left hip (femoral neck, internal, and total hip) and lumbar spine (L1-L4, L-Total) was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and calcaneal BMD was measured with QUS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the best cutoff values, sensitivity, and specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) between the different screening tools was compared. Our study included 472 men with mean age of 78.0 years. The prevalence of osteoporosis was 27.7 %.The best cutoff for OSTA was -3.5 for predicting men with osteoporosis at any site; this yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 47.3 % and 76.8 %, respectively. The AUC for OSTA was 0.676. The optimal cutoff for QUS-T score was -1.25, with a sensitivity of 80.4 % and specificity of 59.7 %. The AUC for QUS-T score was 0.762. Combining QUS with OSTA improved the specificity to 92.9 % but reduced sensitivity to 36.1 %. A new variable derived from a combination of OSTA and the QUS-T score gave a better performance, with sensitivity of 70.1 % and specificity of 72.1 %; the AUC for this variable was 0.771, which was greater than OSTA but not different from QUS alone. In conclusion, OSTA and QUS, respectively, and their combination may help find populations at high risk for osteoporosis, which could be an alternative method for diagnosing osteoporosis, especially in areas where DXA measurement is not accessible.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 238
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Osteoporosis is inversely associated with arterial stiffness in the elderly: An investigation using the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians index in an elderly Chinese cohort
    Xuan, Yan
    Wang, Weiliang
    Zhang, Hong
    Tan, Isabella
    Butlin, Mark
    Avolio, Alberto
    Zuo, Junli
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2019, 21 (03): : 405 - 411
  • [22] DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND AND OSTEOPOROSIS SELF-ASSESSMENT TOOL IN COMPARISON WITH DXA IN DETECTING LOW BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN POSTMENOPAUSALWOMEN IN RIYADH, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
    Kazi, A.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 : S470 - S470
  • [23] Real world fracture prediction of fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and one-minute osteoporosis risk test: An 11-year longitudinal study
    Sheng, Yueh-Hsuan
    Wu, Tai-Yin
    Liaw, Chen-Kun
    Hsiao, Sheng-Huang
    Kuo, Kuan-Liang
    Tsai, Ching-Yao
    BONE REPORTS, 2024, 20
  • [24] Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool
    Lin, JiSheng
    Yang, Yong
    Fei, Qi
    Zhang, XiaoDong
    Ma, Zhao
    Wang, Qi
    Li, JinJun
    Li, Dong
    Meng, Qian
    Wang, BingQiang
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2016, 11 : 461 - 469
  • [25] Comparison of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians and the fracture risk assessment tool - FRAX to identify densitometric defined osteoporosis: A discriminatory value analysis in a multi-ethnic female population in Southeast Asia
    Chandran, Manju
    Chin, Yun Ann
    Choo, Kuan Swen
    Ang, Wan Chen
    Huang, Xiao Feng
    Liu, Xiao Ming
    Tay, Donovan
    Aung, Tin Kyaw Kyaw
    Ali, Amin
    Thu, Win Pa Pa
    Logan, Susan
    Yan, Sean Xuexian
    Lekamwasam, Sarath
    Hao, Ying
    OSTEOPOROSIS AND SARCOPENIA, 2020, 6 (02) : 53 - 58
  • [26] Impact of Sexual Dimorphism on Trauma Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with a High-Risk Score of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Tang, Chien-En
    Liu, Hang-Tsung
    Kuo, Pao-Jen
    Chen, Yi-Chun
    Hsu, Shiun-Yuan
    Lin, Chih-Che
    Hsieh, Ching-Hua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (03):
  • [27] Beijing Friendship Hospital Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Elderly Male (BFH-OSTM) vs Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: a cross-sectional study
    An, Ning
    Lin, Ji Sheng
    Fei, Qi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [28] Beijing Friendship Hospital Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Elderly Male (BFH-OSTM) vs Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: a cross-sectional study
    Ning An
    Ji Sheng Lin
    Qi Fei
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22