Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 5 years of experience in 201 patients

被引:14
|
作者
Karami, Hossein [1 ]
Jabbari, Mohammad [1 ]
Arbab, Amir Haji Mohammad Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shaheed Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohada E Tajrish Hosp, Urol & Nephrol Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Tehran 1666679951, Iran
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2007.0406
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients and Methods: From June 2000 to September 2005, 201 patients with renal stones >2 cm underwent tubeless PCNL by a single surgeon. We report details of the outcomes. Results: The complete stone clearance rate was 91.04% (183 patients). After surgery, 18 patients (8.96%) had stones (mean size = 7 mm) detected on a plain abdominal radiograph or ultrasonographic examination and were referred for shockwave lithotripsy. The mean stone size was 30 mm. (range 20-40 mm). The mean operative time was 35 minutes (range 30-60 min), and the mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (range 2-5 days). Postoperative ultrasonography did not reveal considerable fluid collection. There were no visceral injuries. Twenty-two (10.9%) patients received a transfusion, and 16 (7.9%) patients had urinary tract infection. Conclusion: In our experience, tubeless PCNL is safe, effective, and feasible without any discomfort for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1411 / 1413
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Truly tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Cetti, R. J.
    Keoghane, S. R.
    Walmsley, B. H.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (03) : 269 - 269
  • [32] Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A comparative study with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Gupta, NP
    Kesarwani, P
    Goel, R
    Aron, M
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2005, 74 (01) : 58 - 61
  • [33] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SUPINE TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: INITIAL EXPERIENCE
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Chung, Doo Yong
    Kim, Kyu Hyun
    Chang, Jin Seok
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Cho, Kang Su
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A337 - A337
  • [34] Complications of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Channa, Mazhar Ali
    Soomro, Abdul Saboor
    Khalique, Abdul
    Pardip
    Mustafa, Ghulam
    Hussain, Mudasir
    Hussain, Manzoor
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (10): : 2859 - 2862
  • [35] An alternative for standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy:: Tubeless and stentless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Okan IStanbulluog, Mustafa
    Gonen, Murat
    Cicek, Tufan
    Cenker, Ali
    Guvel, Sezgin
    Tekin, Iteri
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A132 - A132
  • [36] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Nephrostomy or Tubeless or Totally Tubeless? REPLY
    Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan
    Cicek, Tufan
    UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (05) : 1047 - 1047
  • [37] A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
    Hyams, E. S.
    Berkowitz, J.
    Matlaga, B.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A230 - A230
  • [38] Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is it safe?
    Nirmal, T. J.
    Samiran, Adhikary
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 25 (03) : 418 - +
  • [39] Comparison of standard with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Gupta, N. P.
    Mishra, Saurabh
    Suryawanshi, Manav
    Seth, Amlesh
    Kumar, Rajeev
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (07) : 1441 - 1446
  • [40] TUBE OR TUBELESS DURING PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY?
    Hou, Yuchuan
    Chen, Shuaiqi
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Wang, Chunxi
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A202 - A202