Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 1): pros and cons of MRI screening

被引:5
|
作者
Alonso Roca, S. [1 ]
Delgado Laguna, A. B. [1 ]
Arantzeta Lexarreta, J. [1 ]
Cajal Campo, B. [1 ]
Santamaria Jareno, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Fdn Alcorcon, Serv Radiodiagnost, Madrid, Spain
来源
RADIOLOGIA | 2020年 / 62卷 / 04期
关键词
Cancer screening; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Breast tumors; Risk factors; Genetic predisposition to disease; Sensitivity and specificity; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; HIGH FAMILIAL RISK; ABBREVIATED PROTOCOL; PERSONAL HISTORY; 2ND-LOOK ULTRASOUND; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DENSE BREASTS; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rx.2020.01.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Screening plays an important rote in women with a high risk of breast cancer. Given this population's high incidence of breast cancer and younger age of onset compared to the general population, it is recommended that screening starts earlier. There is ample evidence that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive diagnostic tool, and American and the European guidelines both recommend annual MRI screening (with supplementary annual mammography) as the optimum screening modality. Nevertheless, the current guidelines do not totally agree about the recommendations for MRI screening in some subgroups of patients. The first part of this article on screening in women with increased risk of breast cancer reviews the literature to explain and evaluate the advantages of MRI screening compared to screening with mammography alone: increased detection of smaller cancers with less associated lymph node involvement and a reduction in the rate of interval cancers, which can have an impact on survival and mortality (with comparable effects to other preventative measures). At the same time, however, we would like to reflect on the drawbacks of MRI screening that affect its applicability. (C) 2020 SERAM. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 265
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    Pinker, Katja
    Dershaw, D. David
    Hughes, Mary
    Gibbons, Girard F.
    Rahbar, Kareem
    Robson, Mark E.
    Mangino, Debra A.
    Goldman, Debra
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Sung, Janice S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 97 : 37 - 43
  • [32] Pros and cons of screening for occult Cushing syndrome
    Tabarin, Antoine
    Perez, Paul
    NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2011, 7 (08) : 445 - 455
  • [33] THE PROS AND CONS OF PREVENTIVE SCREENING FOR THE FRAGILE (X)
    TURNER, G
    PARTINGTON, MW
    ROBINSON, H
    LATHAM, M
    KENNY, J
    VANDENBERK, M
    LAING, S
    THODE, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1988, 30 (1-2): : 26 - 27
  • [34] Thyroid Screening in Early Pregnancy: Pros and Cons
    Taylor, Peter N.
    Zouras, Stamatios
    Min, Thinzar
    Nagarahaj, Kalyani
    Lazarus, John H.
    Okosieme, Onyebuchi
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [35] Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis - Pros and cons
    Stopsack, M.
    Hammermann, J.
    MONATSSCHRIFT KINDERHEILKUNDE, 2009, 157 (12) : 1222 - 1229
  • [36] Pros and cons of screening for occult Cushing syndrome
    Antoine Tabarin
    Paul Perez
    Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2011, 7 : 445 - 455
  • [37] Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: pros and cons
    Dankert-Roelse, J. E.
    Vernooij-van Langen, A.
    BREATHE, 2011, 8 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [38] Rapid screening for EGFR mutations: Pros and cons
    Gazdar, AF
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (01): : 17 - 18
  • [39] MRI screening in women at average risk for breast cancer
    Schrading, S.
    Kuhl, C. K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S58 - S58
  • [40] MRI screening of women at average risk of breast cancer
    Schrading, S.
    Strobel, K.
    Kuhl, C. K.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73