The Feasibility of Anterior Spinal Access The Vascular Corridor at the L5-S1 Level for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:9
|
作者
Ng, Julia Poh-Hwee [1 ]
Scott-Young, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Chan, Daniel Nim-Cho [4 ]
Oh, Jacob Yoong-Leong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Sengkang Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Spine Surg, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
anterior spine surgery; iliocaval vasculature; imaging; interbody fusion; lumbosacral junction; lumbosacral region; magnetic resonance imaging; spine; surgical planning; vascular anatomy; VASCULAR ANATOMY; SURGERY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003948
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Objective. To analyze the feasibility of anterior spinal access to the vascular corridor at the L5-S1 junction, by evaluating three crucial anatomical landmarks. This provides a framework for risk-stratification for the clinician during preoperative evaluation. Summary of Background Data. The anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) offers many advantages for fusion at the L5-S1 junction. However, the variant iliac vasculature may preclude safe anterior access. Methods. Five hundred magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of the L5-S1 level were identified, with 379 meeting inclusion criteria. We graded the anterior access into three grades, namely, easy, advanced, or difficult by looking at three important anatomical landmarks-the vascular corridor (narrow if <= 25 mm, medium if 25-35mm [inclusive], and wide if >35 mm), the left common iliac vein (LCIV) location (grades AD based on the relative position of the LCIV to the L5-S1 disc space), and the presence or absence of a fat plane. Results. Our results showed that 43.27% of the patients had wide corridor for the anterior access, 19.26% of patients had no fat plane, and 7.65% had a LCIV that extended past the midline of the disc (Grade C, D: >50%). By combining these three factors, 37.20% would have easy anterior access, while a minority (1.85%) would have a difficult anterior access. Conclusion. The ALIF at L5-S1 offers significant benefits to the patient. The surgeon should be aware of the dangers in an anterior access by looking at three crucial factors to determine whether the access is easy, advanced, or difficult. Patients with a difficult access should be attempted by experts, vascular access surgeons, or consider an alternative approach to L5-S1.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 989
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion a Safe and Efficacious Treatment for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis of L5-S1?
    Viglione, Luke L.
    Chamoli, Uphar
    Diwan, Ashish D.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (06) : 587 - 595
  • [22] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) versus Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) at L5-S1: A Comparison of Two Approaches to the Lumbosacral Junction
    Xi, Zhuo
    Burch, Shane
    Chang, Chih-Chang
    Ruan, Hui-bing
    Eichler, Charles M.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Chou, Dean
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 83 - 83
  • [23] Review of Vascular Anterior Exposure for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Theivendran, Mayo
    Thoo, Cathy
    Mulcahy, Michael
    Neale, Michael
    Puttaswamy, Vikram
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (02) : 537 - 537
  • [24] The Effect of Changes in Segmental Lordosis on Global Lumbar and Adjacent Segment Lordosis After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Gandhi, Sapan D.
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [25] Anatomical Feasibility of Right Oblique Approach for L5-S1 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Song, Se-Jin
    Shin, Myung-Hoon
    Kim, Jong-Tae
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 132 : E403 - E408
  • [26] Vulnerability of the L5 nerve root during anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: case series and review of the literature
    Dowlati, Ehsan
    Alexander, Hepzibha
    Voyadzis, Jean-Marc
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2020, 49 (03) : 1 - 9
  • [27] Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 for Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position
    Singh, Shikha
    McCloskey, Kyle
    Ahmad, Hasan S.
    Turlip, Ryan
    Ghenbot, Yohannes
    Sinha, Saurabh
    Yoon, Jang W.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E416 - E426
  • [28] Degenerative disc disease and isthmic spondylolisthesis have similar outcomes after L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Gandhi, Sapan D.
    Rudisill, Samuel S.
    Perez-Albela, Alejandro
    Phillips, Frank M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 136
  • [29] Early outcomes and safety of outpatient (surgery center) vs inpatient based L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Snowden, Ryan
    Fischer, Dylan
    Kraemer, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 73 : 183 - 186
  • [30] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Symptomatic L5-S1 Retrolisthesis
    Cho, Steve S.
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Didomenico, Joseph D.
    Teng, Clare W.
    Park, Marian T.
    Chang, Steve W.
    Snyder, Laura A.
    Mirzadeh, Zaman
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Turner, Jay D.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 26 (05) : 559 - 567