The interpolation damage detection method for frames under seismic excitation

被引:56
|
作者
Limongelli, M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Struct Engn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
MODAL PARAMETERS; FREQUENCY; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsv.2011.06.012
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In this paper a new procedure, addressed as Interpolation Damage Detecting Method (IDDM), is investigated as a possible mean for early detection and location of light damage in a structure struck by an earthquake. Damage is defined in terms of the accuracy of a spline function in interpolating the operational mode shapes (ODS) of the structure. At a certain location a decrease (statistically meaningful) of accuracy, with respect to a reference configuration, points out a localized variation of the operational shapes thus revealing the existence of damage. In this paper, the proposed method is applied to a numerical model of a multistory frame, simulating a damaged condition through a reduction of the story stiffness. Several damage scenarios have been considered and the results indicate the effectiveness of the method to assess and localize damage for the case of concentrated damage and for low to medium levels of noise in the recorded signals. The main advantage of the proposed algorithm is that it does not require a numerical model of the structure as well as an intense data postprocessing or user interaction. The ODS are calculated from Frequency Response Functions hence responses recorded on the structure can be directly used without the need of modal identification. Furthermore, the local character of the feature chosen to detect damage makes the IDDM less sensitive to noise and to environmental changes with respect to other damage detection methods. For these reasons the IDDM appears as a valid option for automated post-earthquake damage assessment, able to provide after an earthquake, reliable information about the location of damage. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5474 / 5489
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INFLUENCE OF CUMULATIVE DAMAGE ON THE SEISMIC RELIABILITY OF MULTISTORY FRAMES
    ESTEVA, L
    DIAZ, O
    RELIABILITY AND OPTIMIZATION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, V, 1993, 12 : 65 - 72
  • [42] SEISMIC DAMAGE ASSESSMENT STUDY ON EXISTING CONCRETE FRAMES
    Chen, Xinxiao
    Gao, Wanjiong
    Zhou, Shuguang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND II, 2014, : 931 - 938
  • [43] The seismic response analysis method of the jacket under multiple support excitation
    Sun Jianmei
    Cui Hao
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING II, PTS 1-4, 2013, 256-259 : 2051 - 2055
  • [44] Story seismic damage index for reinforced concrete frames
    Bonilla, R.M.
    Lopez, O.A.
    Boletin Tecnico/Technical Bulletin, 1998, 36 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [45] SEISMIC DAMAGE IN REINFORCED-CONCRETE FRAMES - DISCUSSION
    MEYER, C
    LEE, JLJ
    ROUFAIEL, MSL
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1983, 109 (01): : 286 - 287
  • [46] Dynamic detection and damage evaluation of Yingxiuwan hydropower station sluice under flood discharge excitation after strong seismic shock
    Li, Huo-Kun
    Lian, Ji-Jian
    Yang, Min
    Zhang, Qi
    Peng, Wen-Ming
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2010, 29 (09): : 64 - 68
  • [47] EVALUATION OF CUMULATIVE DAMAGE FAILURE OF A REACTOR FEED VERTICAL PUMP UNDER SEISMIC EXCITATION
    IWATSUBO, T
    RES MECHANICA, 1990, 29 (04): : 313 - 327
  • [48] Shaking table experimental study on damage mechanism of the disconnecting switch under seismic excitation
    Dembowski, Pawel
    Jankowski, Robert
    ADVANCES IN FRACTURE AND DAMAGE MECHANICS X, 2012, 488-489 : 351 - 354
  • [49] Overall damage identification of flag-shaped hysteresis systems under seismic excitation
    Zhou, Cong
    Chase, J. Geoffrey
    Rodgers, Geoffrey W.
    Xu, Chao
    Tomlinson, Hamish
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 16 (01) : 163 - 181
  • [50] Modeling of rocking frames under seismic loading
    Diamantopoulos, Spyridon
    Fragiadakis, Michalis
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2022, 51 (01): : 108 - 128