The role of analytical variability in secondary data replications: a replication of Kim et al. (2014)

被引:5
|
作者
Bokhove, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton Educ Sch, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
Replication; international largescale assessment; analytical variability; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; TRANSPARENCY; LITERACY; ANALYSTS; ISSUES; SCHOOL;
D O I
10.1080/13803611.2021.2022319
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
An article by Kim et al. from 2014 examined individual- and school-level variables affecting the information and communication technology (ICT) literacy level of Korean elementary school students, finding differential gender effects. In this secondary data replication, we used data from the 2018 International Computer and Information Literacy Study, focusing on data from Korea as main replication. As many characteristics of the study as possible, such as variables and analytical strategy, were modelled in the analysis. Additional analyses included 13 countries and jurisdictions, varied centring techniques for variables, and missing data treatment. The replication and analyses were pre-registered via the Open Science Framework. The main analysis did not replicate the main gender finding. However, it was also clear that, despite care taken in a rigorous replication, analytical variability still plays a large role in replications of findings, and with secondary datasets. We discuss the implications of this for secondary data replications.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 163
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Practical models for publishing replications in behavioral ecology: a comment on Ihle et al.
    Parker, Timothy H.
    Nakagawa, Shinichi
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 28 (02) : 355 - +
  • [32] Pain as Social Glue: A Preregistered Direct Replication of Experiment 2 of Bastian et al. (2014)
    Prochazka, Jakub
    Parilakova, Katarina
    Rudolf, Patrik
    Bruk, Vojtech
    Jungwirthova, Rut
    Fejtova, Sara
    Masaryk, Radomir
    Vaculik, Martin
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 33 (03) : 463 - 473
  • [33] The Interpretation of Scholars' Interpretations of Confidence Intervals: Criticism, Replication, and Extension of Hoekstra et al. (2014)
    Garcia-Perez, Miguel A.
    Alcala-Quintana, Rocio
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [34] Rebuttal to the Formal Comment on Schorr et al. (2014) submitted by Tyack et al. (2015)
    Schorr, Gregory S.
    Falcone, Erin A.
    Moretti, David J.
    Andrews, Russel D.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [35] Comments on the paper by Horowitz et al. (2014)
    G. M. Innocenti
    R. Caminiti
    F. Aboitiz
    Brain Structure and Function, 2015, 220 (3) : 1789 - 1790
  • [36] Comment on the paper by Isla et al. (2014)
    Kedzierska-Mieszkowska, Sabina
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 180 (1-2) : 167 - 167
  • [37] Cryptanalysis and the improvement of Kim et al.'s password authentication schemes
    Giri, Debasis
    Srivastava, P. D.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4812 : 156 - 166
  • [38] Discussion of 010405JOR by J. Kim et al.
    Zaccone, Alessio
    Laurati, Marco
    Colby, Ralph
    Vlassopoulos, Dimitris
    JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY, 2014, 58 (05) : 1391 - 1394
  • [39] The Construction of the Maternal Brain: Theoretical Comment on Kim et al. (2010)
    Kinsley, Craig H.
    Meyer, Elizabeth A.
    BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 124 (05) : 710 - 714
  • [40] A reply to Miller et al.: Replication made simple
    Peffley, M
    Knigge, P
    Hurwitz, J
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2001, 54 (02) : 421 - 429