Decision-making tree for women considering hysterectomy

被引:13
|
作者
Wu, SM
Yu, YMC
Yang, CF
Che, HL
机构
[1] Chang Gung Inst Technol, Dept Nursing, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch & Grad Inst Nursing, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
uterus; fibroids; hysterectomy; decision-making; decision-tree modelling; nursing;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03507.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims. This paper reports on a study carried out to establish a decision tree model to describe how women in Taiwan make the decision whether or not to have a hysterectomy. In addition, we examined the predictability of the decision-tree model. Background. Hysterectomy is the second most common surgical procedure performed worldwide. Medical professionals believe that the operation can relieve pain and prevent cervical cancer, thus improving a woman's quality of life. While most physicians advise hysterectomy even for benign uterine conditions, feminists decry the belief that the uterus has no purpose, believing that it is an important symbol of womanhood. Methods. The study was conducted in two phases. Phase I, the model development phase, was carried out to generalize data from a qualitative study of 14 women and to establish a tree model outlining their decision to proceed with hysterectomy. The second phase was the model prediction phase that applied inductive and deductive methods to data analysis and development of the decision-tree model. The model tree was then tested with 18 women who were deciding whether or not to undergo hysterectomy. Using the decision-making tree, we studied the women's thought processes and analysed their primary concerns. The study was carried out in 1999-2001. Results. The study determined 13 criteria that Taiwanese women use when deciding about having a hysterectomy. Developed in accordance with Gladwin's methodology, the model tree successfully predicted 90% of decisions whether or not to have a hysterectomy. Conclusions. Nurses working in gynaecological services should understand how women decide to undergo hysterectomy so that the proper counselling and follow-up can be provided. With further testing, our decision tree may help in this process.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 368
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women's hysterectomy experiences and decision-making
    Uskul, AK
    Ahmad, F
    Leyland, NA
    Stewart, DE
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2003, 38 (01) : 53 - 67
  • [2] Women's perceptions of decision-making about hysterectomy
    Skea, Z
    Harry, V
    Bhattacharya, S
    Entwistle, V
    Williams, B
    MacLennan, G
    Templeton, A
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [3] CONSIDERING COSTS IN EDUCATIONAL DECISION-MAKING
    RAGSDALE, RG
    INTERCHANGE, 1979, 10 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [4] LOGIC TREE ANALYSIS FOR DECISION-MAKING
    LOPEZ, DA
    VANSLYKE, WJ
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1977, 5 (05): : 614 - 617
  • [5] MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING AND ELECTIVE SURGERY - THE CASE OF HYSTERECTOMY
    TRAVIS, CB
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1985, 5 (03) : 241 - 251
  • [6] Hysterectomy: Improving the patient's decision-making process
    Gambone, JC
    Reiter, RC
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04): : 868 - 877
  • [7] The Circular Decision-Making Tree: an Operational Framework
    Greer R.
    von Wirth T.
    Loorbach D.
    Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2023, 3 (2): : 693 - 718
  • [8] Developing a decision-making tree for circular economy
    Lozano, Rodrigo
    Lozano, Francisco Jose
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 32 (03) : 1589 - 1598
  • [9] Factors influencing women's decision making in hysterectomy
    Janda, Monika
    Armfield, Nigel R.
    Page, Katie
    Kerr, Gayle
    Kurz, Suzanne
    Jackson, Graeme
    Currie, Jason
    Weaver, Edward
    Yazdani, Anusch
    Obermair, Andreas
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2018, 101 (03) : 504 - 510
  • [10] Women and decision-making: An Ethiopian experience
    Daba, Y
    IN SEARCH OF A ROUND TABLE: GENDER, THEOLOGY & CHURCH LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 174 - 175