Impact of antibiotic stewardship on perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis

被引:21
|
作者
Murri, Rita [1 ,2 ]
De Belvis, Antonio Giulio [1 ,3 ]
Fantoni, Massimo [1 ,2 ]
Tanzariello, Maria [1 ,3 ]
Parente, Paolo [3 ]
Marventano, Stefano [1 ,4 ]
Bucci, Sabina [1 ,3 ]
Giovannenze, Francesca [1 ,2 ]
Ricciardi, Walter [1 ,3 ]
Cauda, Roberto [1 ,2 ]
Sganga, Gabriele [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Teaching Hosp A Gemelli, Largo Agostino Gemelli 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Infect Dis Sect, Dept Publ Hlth, Largo Francesco Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Hyg Sect, Dept Publ Hlth, Largo Francesco Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Catania, Sect Hyg & Publ Hlth, Dept GF Ingrassia, Via Santa Sofia 87, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[5] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Gen Surg & Organ Transplantat Sect, Dept Surg, Largo Francesco Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
antibiotic prophylaxis; quality improvement; surgical infection; excess/defect; SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS; GUIDELINES; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; PREVENTION; ADHERENCE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzw055
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) is useful to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse, as well against the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs). This study aimed to describe the implementation of a quality improvement intervention on AP for elective surgery, as informal interviews showed a lower than expected compliance with internal recommendations, and to evaluate intervention's effect in terms of main drug consumption. Design: A quality improvement intervention on all elective cases within 14 main surgical departments was performed. SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines were used in designing and reporting. Setting: The intervention was implemented in an Italian Teaching Hospital 2 years after the adoption of internal evidence-based AP recommendations. Participants: Professionals involved in elective surgery. Intervention(s): The intervention was structured into two phases: a survey was conducted during two non-consecutive weeks period (April-May 2013) to assess the adherence to the international guidelines in AP; survey's results were presented and discussed with all the surgical teams (December 2013-April 2014). Main outcome measure(s): Impact on cefazolin consumption (in defined daily doses per 100 procedures). Results: Data of AP for 653 surgical procedures in terms of type, timing, duration, excess and defect were analyzed. An optimal AP rate resulted in 48.1% cases. Reduction in cefazolin use (-21.5%) and cost (-22.9%) was registered. Conclusions: Though results cannot be generalized to all hospital populations, the implemented intervention is likely to improve AP consequently improving quality of care and reducing costs. Further studies are needed to evaluate specific outcomes such as rate of SSIs and antibiotic resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 507
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of antimicrobial stewardship on reserve antibiotic use and procuring cost
    Qibtiyah, Mariyatul
    Wahyuhadi, Joni
    Khotib, Junaidi
    [J]. PHARMACY EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (04): : 149 - 153
  • [22] Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship for Pediatric Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy
    Hersh, Adam L.
    Olson, Jared
    Stockmann, Chris
    Thorell, Emily A.
    Knackstedt, Elizabeth D.
    Esquibel, Lawanda
    Sanderson, Susan
    Pavia, Andrew T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2018, 7 (02) : E34 - E36
  • [23] Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis adherence: before and after antimicrobial stewardship team impact in a south Indian secondary care hospital
    Dorairajan, Suresh Kumar
    Srinivasan, Sowmiya
    Basha, Safiya Banu Sadik
    Sivakumar, Sanju Menaka
    Rajavel, Saravanan
    Kannan, Sakthi Atchitha Sudalai
    Mari, Rithika
    Kuppusamy, Santhiya
    Koteeswaran, Monish Kumar
    [J]. JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2024, 6 : 5 - 5
  • [24] Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: improved compliance and impact on infection rates
    Prospero, E.
    Barbadoro, P.
    Marigliano, A.
    Martini, E.
    D'Errico, M. M.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 139 (09): : 1326 - 1331
  • [25] Impact of Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on the Microbiome in Patients with Cutaneous Malignancy
    Cass, Samuel H.
    Damania, Ashish
    Seo, Y. David
    Witt, Russell
    Meng, Xiaolong
    Sahasrabhojane, Pranoti
    Shelburne, Samuel
    Somaiya, Kinjal
    Mungovan, Kristi
    Matejka, Brenna
    Paguinto, Camille
    Fisher, Sarah
    Lucci, Anthony
    Ross, Merrick I.
    Lee, Jeffrey E.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Duncan, Sheila
    Ajami, Nadim
    Wargo, Jennifer
    Keung, Emily
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S209 - S210
  • [26] Antibiotic prophylaxis for endourological interventions considering antibiotic stewardship
    Kranz, Jennifer
    Schneidewind, Laila
    Pilatz, Adrian
    Wagenlehner, Florian
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2021, 60 (03): : 383 - 392
  • [27] Indications for medical antibiotic prophylaxis and potential targets for antimicrobial stewardship intervention: a narrative review
    Ioannou, Petros
    Karakonstantis, Stamatis
    Schouten, Jeroen
    Kostyanev, Tomislav
    Charani, Esmita
    Vlahovic-Palcevski, Vera
    Kofteridis, Diamantis P.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (03) : 362 - 370
  • [28] Current perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
    Kujath, R.
    Bouchard, R.
    Scheele, J.
    Esnaashari, H.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2006, 77 (06): : 490 - +
  • [29] Impact of a legal reimbursement system for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.
    Carsauw, H
    Suetens, C
    Lauwers, S
    Glupczynski, Y
    Monnet, DL
    Jepsen, OB
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 21 (02): : 89 - 89
  • [30] Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in urology
    Hofstetter, A
    [J]. EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF CLINICAL CARE AND RESEARCH IN SURGERY, 1997, SUPPL : 1026 - 1026