Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle

被引:31
|
作者
Robertson, Peter A. [1 ]
Armstrong, William A. [2 ]
Woods, Daniel L. [2 ]
Rawlinson, Jeremy J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mercy Specialist Ctr, Orthopaed Clin, 100 Mt Rd,Epsom 1023, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Medtron Spine, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
cadaveric testing; hyperlordotic cages; interbody cages; lordosis; lordotic cages; lumbar spine surgery; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; radiographic analysis; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; SPINE; ANTERIOR; CLASSIFICATION; RESTORATION; PELVIS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002705
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Controlled cadaveric study of surgical technique in transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF and PLIF) Objective. To evaluate the contribution of surgical techniques and cage variables in lordosis recreation in posterior interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF). Summary of Background Data. The major contributors to lumbar lordosis are the lordotic lower lumbar discs. The pathologies requiring treatment with segmental fusion are frequently hypolordotic or kyphotic. Current posterior based interbody techniques have a poor track record for recreating lordosis, although recreation of lordosis with optimum anatomical alignment is associated with better outcomes and reduced adjacent segment change needing revision. It is unclear whether surgical techniques or cage parameters contribute significantly to lordosis recreation. Methods. Eight instrumented cadaveric motion segments were evaluated with pre and post experimental radiological assessment of lordosis. Each motion segment was instrumented with pedicle screw fixation to allow segmental stabilization. The surgical procedures were unilateral TLIF with an 188 lordotic and 27mm length cage, unilateral TLIF (188, 27 mm) with bilateral facetectomy, unilateral TLIF (188, 27 mm) with posterior column osteotomy (PCO), PLIF with bilateral cages (188, 22 mm), and PLIF with bilateral cages (248, 22 mm). Cage insertion used and "insert and rotate'' technique. Results. Pooled results demonstrated a mean increase in lordosis of 2.2 degrees with each procedural step (lordosis increase was serially 1.8 degrees, 3.5 degrees, 1.6 degrees, 2.5 degrees, and 1.6 degrees through the procedures). TLIF and PLIF with PCO increased lordosis significantly compared with unilateral TLIF and TLIF with bilateral facetectomy. The major contributors to lordosis recreation were PCO, and PLIF with paired shorter cages rather than TLIF. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the surgical approach to posterior interbody surgery influences lordosis gain and PCO optimizes lordosis gain in TLIF. The bilateral cages used in PLIF are shorter and associated with further gain in lordosis. This information has the potential to aid surgical planning when attempting to recreate lordosis to optimize outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:E1350 / E1357
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Revision for cage migration after transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion: how to perform revision surgery?
    Tanaka, Masato
    Wei, Zhang
    Kanamaru, Akihiro
    Masuda, Shin
    Fujiwara, Yoshihiro
    Uotani, Koji
    Arataki, Shinya
    Yamauchi, Taro
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [42] Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Gödde, S
    Fritsch, E
    Dienst, M
    Kohn, D
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) : 1693 - 1699
  • [43] A comparative study between local bone graft with a cage and with no cage in single posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study
    Liu, Zhili
    Liu, Jiaming
    Tan, Yongming
    He, Laichang
    Long, Xinhua
    Yang, Dong
    Huang, Shanhu
    Shu, Yong
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (08) : 1051 - 1057
  • [44] A comparative study between local bone graft with a cage and with no cage in single posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study
    Zhili Liu
    Jiaming Liu
    Yongming Tan
    Laichang He
    Xinhua Long
    Dong Yang
    Shanhu Huang
    Yong Shu
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2014, 134 : 1051 - 1057
  • [45] Comparative effectiveness of two different interbody fusion methods for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cage versus morselized impacted bone grafts
    Chaoliang Lv
    Xianzhou Li
    Haicheng Zhang
    Junrong Lv
    Hongmei Zhang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16
  • [46] Comparative effectiveness of two different interbody fusion methods for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cage versus morselized impacted bone grafts
    Lv, Chaoliang
    Li, Xianzhou
    Zhang, Haicheng
    Lv, Junrong
    Zhang, Hongmei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
  • [47] Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis A STROBE- compliant observational study
    Zhang, Dapeng
    Mao, Keya
    Qiang, Xiaojun
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (37)
  • [48] Revision of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study in nonosteoporotic bone Laboratory investigation
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Mehbod, Amir
    Fischer, Gustav
    Faundez, Antonio
    Wu, Wentien
    Transfeldt, Ensor
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 12 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [49] Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model
    Mantell, Matthew
    Cyriac, Mathew
    Haines, Colin M.
    Gudipally, Manasa
    O'Brien, Joseph R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [50] Vertebral bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Aguirre, Alexander O.
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Ruggiero, Nicco
    Azmy, Shady
    Khan, Asham
    Ghannam, Moleca M.
    Almeida, Neil D.
    Jowdy, Patrick K.
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    Pollina, John
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (12): : 2017 - 2023