The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding Funders need to experiment with versions of peer review and decision-making

被引：23
|
作者：
Bendiscioli, Sandra [1 ]
机构：
[1] EMBO, Sci Policy, Heidelberg, Germany
来源：
EMBO REPORTS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 12期
关键词：
D O I：
10.15252/embr.201949472
中图分类号：
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号：
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要：
Peer review to allocate funding for researchers and projects has faced difficulties lately and come under criticism. Various alternatives and improvements are being tested to address these problems.[graphic not available: see fulltext]
引用
收藏
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Peer review of funding applications for health research in ethnic minority groups must improve
    Kudrna, Laura
    Lilford, Richard
    Adebajo, Ade
    Kumar, Kanta
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
  • [42] Evaluation for the allocation of university research project funding: Can rules improve the peer review?
    Reale, Emanuela
    Zinilli, Antonio
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2017, 26 (03) : 190 - 198
  • [43] Peer review and over-competitive research funding fostering mainstream opinion to monopoly
    Fang, Hui
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 87 (02) : 293 - 301
  • [44] The Feeling Rules of Peer Review: Defining, Displaying, and Managing Emotions in Evaluation for Research Funding
    Brunet, Lucas
    Mueller, Ruth
    MINERVA, 2024, 62 (02) : 167 - 192
  • [45] Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
    Barnett, Adrian G.
    Herbert, Danielle L.
    Campbell, Megan
    Daly, Naomi
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Mudge, Alison
    Graves, Nicholas
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [46] The need to review low-dose decision-making in radiation protection
    Coates, Roger
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2022, 42 (01)
  • [47] The need to review low-dose decision-making in radiation protection
    The White House, Bouth, Cumbria
    LA12 8JB, United Kingdom
    J. Radiol. Prot., 2022, 1
  • [48] Decision-making approaches used by UK and international health funding organisations for allocating research funds: A survey of current practice
    Meadmore, Katie
    Fackrell, Kathryn
    Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra
    Bull, Abby
    Fraser, Simon D. S.
    Blatch-Jones, Amanda
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [49] Information Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice
    McCarty, Lynn S.
    Borgert, Christopher J.
    Mihaich, Ellen M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 120 (07) : 927 - 934
  • [50] Commentary on scientific peer review to inform regulatory decision making: Roles and perspectives of scientists
    Omenn, GS
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (01) : 37 - 39
12345