Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy Improves Selection of Patients Considered for Active Surveillance for Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Systematic Biopsies

被引:66
|
作者
Ouzzane, Adil [1 ,3 ]
Renard-Penna, Raphaele [4 ]
Marliere, Francois [1 ]
Mozer, Pierre [5 ]
Olivier, Jonathan [1 ]
Barkatz, Johann
Puech, Philippe [2 ,3 ]
Villers, Arnauld [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Dept Urol, Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Dept Radiol, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHRU Lille, INSERM, ONCO THAI,U1189, Loos, France
[4] Univ Paris 06, Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, AP HP, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie,Dept Radiol, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris 06, Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, AP HP, Fac Med Pierre & Marie Curie,Dept Urol, Paris, France
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2015年 / 194卷 / 02期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; diagnostic imaging; biopsy; watchful waiting; MEN; PREDICTION; CANDIDATES; COHORT; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Current selection criteria for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy underestimate prostate cancer volume and grade. We investigated the role of additional magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in reclassifying patients eligible for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy. Materials and Methods: We performed a study at 2 institutions in a total of 281 men with increased prostate specific antigen. All men met certain criteria, including 1) prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging, 12-core transrectal systematic biopsy and 2 additional magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies of lesions suspicious for cancer during the same sequence as systematic biopsy, and 2) eligibility for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy results. Criteria for active surveillance were prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml, no Gleason grade 4/5, 5 mm or less involvement of any biopsy core and 2 or fewer positive systematic biopsy cores. Patient characteristics were compared between reclassified and nonreclassified groups based on magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy results. Results: On magnetic resonance imaging 58% of the 281 patients had suspicious lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy was positive for cancer in 81 of 163 patients (50%). Of 281 patients 28 (10%) were reclassified by magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy as ineligible for active surveillance based on Gleason score in 8, cancer length in 20 and Gleason score plus cancer length in 9. Suspicious areas on magnetic resonance imaging were in the anterior part of the prostate in 15 of the 28 men (54%). Reclassified patients had a smaller prostate volume (37 vs 52 cc) and were older (66.5 vs 63 years) than those who were not reclassified (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy reclassified 10% of patients who were eligible for active surveillance based on systematic biopsy. Its incorporation into the active surveillance eligibility criteria may decrease the risk of reclassification to higher stages during followup.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 356
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abnormal findings on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging predict subsequent biopsy upgrade in patients with low risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance
    Robert R. Flavell
    Antonio C. Westphalen
    Carmin Liang
    Christopher C. Sotto
    Susan M. Noworolski
    Daniel B. Vigneron
    Zhen J. Wang
    John Kurhanewicz
    Abdominal Imaging, 2014, 39 : 1027 - 1035
  • [22] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Selection for Active Surveillance and Can Extend the Interval Between Biopsies
    Thompson, James
    Amin, Amer
    Stricker, Phillip
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (04) : 518 - 519
  • [23] The Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression in Active Surveillance Patients with Bilateral Disease Detected by Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion and Systematic Biopsy
    Williams, Cheyenne
    Khondakar, Nabila R.
    Daneshvar, Michael A.
    O'Connor, Luke P.
    Gomella, Patrick T.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    Egan, Jillian
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Rompre-Brodeur, Alexis
    Webster, Bradley R.
    Owens-Walton, Jeunice
    Parnes, Howard
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Choyke, Peter
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (05): : 1157 - 1165
  • [24] Factors Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading on Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy in an Active Surveillance Population
    Lai, Win Shun
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Thomas, John V.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (11) : 1941 - 1948
  • [25] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Charalampos, Fragkoulis
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 36 (03) : 229 - 230
  • [26] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer
    Alkema, Nicolette G.
    Hoogeveen, Sebastiaan F. J. S.
    Cauberg, Evelyne C. C.
    Witte, Lambertus P. W.
    van't Veer-ten Kate, Miranda
    de Boer, Erwin
    Hoogland, Marije A. M.
    Blanker, Marco H.
    Boomsma, Martijn F.
    Steffens, Martijn G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 125 - 130
  • [27] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy and Pretherapeutic Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment: a Systematic Review
    Diamand, R.
    Mjaess, G.
    Ploussard, G.
    Fiard, G.
    Oderda, M.
    Lefebvre, Y.
    Sirtaine, N.
    Roumeguere, T.
    Peltier, A.
    Albisinni, S.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2022, 32 (06):
  • [28] Combined MRI-targeted Plus Systematic Confirmatory Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification for Patients Enrolling on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    O'Connor, Luke P.
    Wang, Alex Z.
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Zeng, Johnathan
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Harmon, Stephanie
    Merino, Maria J.
    Parnes, Howard L.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    UROLOGY, 2020, 144 : 164 - 170
  • [29] Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Luiting, Henk B.
    Van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Krestin, Gabriel P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) : 124 - 132
  • [30] Can magnetic resonance imaging safely replace a confirmatory biopsy in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer?
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Bihn, John
    Culnan, John
    La, Jennifer
    Goryachev, Sergey
    Corrigan, June
    Dulberger, Karlynn N.
    Swinnerton, Kaitlin
    Lee, Grace
    Garraway, Isla
    Halabi, Susan
    Loeb, Stacy
    Dorff, Tanya B.
    Hauger, Richard
    Nickols, Nicholas George
    Rebbeck, Timothy
    Rettig, Matthew
    Schoen, Martin W.
    Fillmore, Nathanael
    Paller, Channing Judith
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 43 (5_SUPPL) : 331 - 331