Advance selling of uncertain demand in low-carbon supply chain

被引:3
|
作者
Jia, Haicheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jing [3 ]
Liang, Ling [4 ]
Peng, Weicai [5 ]
Xie, Jiqing [1 ]
Xie, Jiaping [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Business Sch, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Chaohu Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Hefei, Peoples R China
基金
国家自然科学基金重大项目;
关键词
Advance selling; Low-carbon supply chain; Carbon emission; Uncertain demand; CAP-AND-TRADE; STRATEGIC CONSUMERS; COMMITMENTS; INFORMATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/IMDS-04-2022-0239
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose The development of low-carbon production is impeded by the investment costs of green technology research and development (R&D) and carbon emission reduction while facing the uncertain risk of emission reduction investment. With the government's carbon emission constraints, green manufacturers implement the advance selling strategy to increase both profit and reduction level. However, few studies consider the consumer's green preference and emission constraints in advance selling market and spot market independently. The authors' paper investigates the optimal strategies of advance selling pricing and reduction effort for green manufacturers to maximize profits. Design/methodology/approach The authors' paper designs a stochastic model and investigates the manufacturer's optimal strategies of advance selling price and emission reduction efforts by categorizing different purchasing periods of low-carbon consumers. With the challenges of uncertain demand and government's emission constraints, the authors' develop the non-linear optimization model to investigate the manufacturer's profit-oriented decisions. Findings The results show the government's carbon constraints cannot influence the manufacturer's profit, but the consumer's low-carbon preference in the advance selling period can. Interestingly, the manufacturer will make fewer reduction efforts even when the consumers have stronger environmental awareness. In addition, the increasing consumer price sensitivity will exacerbate the profit loss from mandatory emissions reduction. Overall, for achieving a win-win situation between emission reduction and profit growth, green manufacturers should not only consider the sales strategies, market demand, and government constraints in a low-carbon market, but also pay attention to the uncertainty of green technology innovation. Originality/value With the consideration of the government's carbon emission constraints, uncertain demand, and low-carbon consumer's preferences, the authors' study innovatively incorporates the joint impacts of advance selling strategy and emission reduction effort strategy and then differentiates between two cases that pertain to the diverse carbon emission regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:2680 / 2709
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revenue sharing contract of low-carbon service supply chain under carbon trading and consumers' low-carbon preference
    Liu, Zhen
    Song, Han
    Dai, Ying
    Peng, Wei
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2022, 28 (01): : 294 - 306
  • [32] Financing decisions of low-carbon supply Chain under Chain-to-Chain competition
    Xia, Tongshui
    Wang, Yuyan
    Lv, Lingxue
    Shen, Liang
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (18) : 6153 - 6176
  • [33] The abatement contract for low-carbon demand in supply chain with single and multiple abatement mechanism under asymmetric information
    Jian Li
    Kin Keung Lai
    Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 324 : 437 - 459
  • [34] The abatement contract for low-carbon demand in supply chain with single and multiple abatement mechanism under asymmetric information
    Li, Jian
    Lai, Kin Keung
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 324 (1-2) : 437 - 459
  • [35] Operational strategies in a low-carbon supply chain considering the impact of carbon credit
    Zhang, Yan
    Yang, Ruiju
    Shi, Xiao
    Zhang, Wen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 442
  • [36] A Study on Supply Chain Emission Reduction Level Based on Carbon Tax and Consumers' Low-Carbon Preferences under Stochastic Demand
    Wang, Liang
    Xu, Tingjia
    Qin, Longhao
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [37] Which Is the Best Supply Chain Policy: Carbon Tax, or a Low-Carbon Subsidy?
    Wu, Hanbo
    Sun, Yaxin
    Su, Yutong
    Chen, Ming
    Zhao, Hongxia
    Li, Qi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [38] Low-carbon supply chain operations: impacts of carbon tax and fairness concerns
    Shi, Song
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 17 : 1239 - 1253
  • [39] Comparative study of low-carbon supply chain carbon emission reduction decisions considering low-carbon policies and power structures
    Qiu, Jun
    Yang, Yuxiang
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2024, 30 (07): : 2566 - 2587
  • [40] Supply chain integration for low-carbon buildings: A critical interdisciplinary review
    Kesidou, Sofia
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 113