Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill, Conventional, and Flowable Resin Composites Stored Dry and Wet

被引:10
|
作者
Jafarpour, Dana
Ferooz, Reihaneh [1 ]
Ferooz, Maryam [2 ]
Bagheri, Rafat [3 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Gen Dentist, Williamtown, Australia
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Shiraz Dent Sch, Biomat Res Ctr, Dept Dent Mat, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
SHEAR PUNCH STRENGTH; FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS; DENTAL COMPOSITES; WATER SORPTION; STORAGE MEDIA; DIMENSIONAL CHANGE; SURFACE; SOLUBILITY; HARDNESS; SORPTION/SOLUBILITY;
D O I
10.1155/2022/7946239
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Surface degradation, margin, and bulk fracture are common reasons that necessitate replacement of resin composite restorations. The purpose of this study was to determine filler weight (FW), fracture toughness (FT), Vickers hardness (VHN), sorption/solubility (S/S), and colour change (Delta E) of four resin composites in dry and wet conditions. Four resin composites of shade A2 were investigated: Aura bulk-fill (AB) (SDI), Tetric Evoceram (TE) (Ivoclar), G-AE nial Universal Flo (GUF) (GC), and GC Kalore (GCK) (GC). For FT, VHN, and Delta E, the specimens were prepared, divided into 2 groups, and stored dry or immersed in distilled water. The specimens were subdivided into three subgroups and stored for 1, 7, and 60 days and then subjected to the relevant tests. Six fractured remnants were weighed for each material to measure FW%. To test S/S, ISO 4049 was used. The data were analysed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. There was an inverse correlation between FW and FT. A significantly higher FT was found for GUF. There were no significant differences between conditions in materials except for AB. The highest VHN was found for GCK and AB. After 1 and 7 days, a significant difference was observed in S/S between all materials with the highest values for GUF. There was a correlation between sorption and solubility. The material, the media, and aging have an influence on the properties of resin composites. It is important to emphasise that each material should be used for a specific clinical need based on their properties.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of occlusal wear between bulk-fill and conventional flowable resin composites
    Ujiie, Maho
    Tsujimoto, Akimasa
    Barkmeier, Wayne W.
    Jurado, Carlos A.
    Villalobos-Tinoco, Jose
    Takamizawa, Toshiki
    Latta, Mark A.
    Miyazaki, Masashi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 33 (02): : 74 - 78
  • [2] Effect of Radiant Exposure on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of 10 Flowable and High-viscosity Bulk-fill Resin Composites
    de Deus, R. a
    Oliveira, L. r s
    Braga, S. s l
    Price, M. T. H. Ribeiro R. B.
    Nunez, A.
    Loguercio, A. d
    Soares, C. j
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 49 (02) : 136 - 156
  • [3] Physical and photoelastic properties of bulk-fill and conventional composites
    Pereira, Renata
    Caldas Giorgi, Maria Cecilia
    Esteves Lins, Rodrigo Barros
    Theobaldo, Essica Dias
    Nunes Leite Lima, Debora Alves
    Marchi, Giselle Maria
    Baggio Aguiar, Flavio Henrique
    [J]. CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 10 : 287 - 296
  • [4] Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of bulk-fill and conventional flowable resin composites using dynamic micro-indentation
    Iwasaki, Taro
    Kamiya, Naotaka
    Hirayama, Satoshi
    Tanimoto, Yasuhiro
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2022, 41 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [5] Comparison of Flexural Properties of Bulk-fill Restorative/Flowable Composites and Their Conventional Counterparts
    Eweis, A. H.
    Yap, A. U.
    Yahya, N. A.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 45 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [6] Relation between conversion degree and cytotoxicity of a flowable bulk-fill and three conventional flowable resin-composites
    Marigo, L.
    Spagnuolo, G.
    Malara, F.
    Martorana, G. E.
    Cordaro, M.
    Lupi, A.
    Nocca, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (23) : 4469 - 4480
  • [7] Effect of Commercial Mouth Rinses on Physical Properties of Conventional and Bulk-fill Resin Composites
    Derigi, L. P.
    Barros, L. S.
    Sugii, M. M.
    Turssi, C. P.
    Franca, F. M. G.
    Basting, R. T.
    Vieira-Junior, W. F.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 48 (06) : 720 - 731
  • [8] Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis
    Frank Engelhardt
    Sebastian Hahnel
    Verena Preis
    Martin Rosentritt
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2016, 20 : 2123 - 2130
  • [9] Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis
    Engelhardt, Frank
    Hahnel, Sebastian
    Preis, Verena
    Rosentritt, Martin
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (08) : 2123 - 2130
  • [10] Fracture Load of Molars Restored with Bulk-fill, Flowable Bulk-fill, and Conventional Resin Composite After Simulated Chewing
    Guerra, L.
    Ramos, R. Q.
    Linhares, L. A.
    Bernardon, J. K.
    Favero, S. S.
    Cesar, P. F.
    Monteiro Junior, S.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 48 (03) : 294 - 303