Extubation and Noninvasive Ventilation of Patients Supported by Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

被引:3
|
作者
Magunia, Harry [1 ]
Guerrero, Aida M. [1 ]
Keller, Marius [1 ]
Jacoby, Johann [2 ]
Schlensak, Christian [3 ]
Haeberle, Helene [1 ]
Koeppen, Michael [1 ]
Nowak-Machen, Martina [4 ]
Rosenberger, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Univ Hosp Tubingen, Inst Clin Epidemiol & Appl Biometry, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Tubingen, Germany
[4] Klinikum Ingolstadt, Inst Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Ingolstadt, Germany
关键词
mechanical circulatory support; extracorporeal life support; heart failure; ECMO; cardiogenic shock; ventilation; noninvasive ventilation; MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RESPIRATORY-FAILURE; AWAKE PATIENTS; BRIDGE; LACTATE; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; ECMO;
D O I
10.1177/0885066620918171
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Temporary extracorporeal life support (ECLS) by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is an emerging therapy for patients with severe, ongoing cardiogenic shock. After stabilization of the hemodynamic status and end-organ function, sedation weaning, extubation, and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be attempted. The goal of this study was to analyze the feasibility of extubation and NIV during versus after ECLS for cardiogenic shock. Methods: Single-center retrospective observational study of 132 patients undergoing ECLS due to severe cardiogenic shock between January 2015 and December 2016 at a tertiary care university hospital. Results: Patients received ECLS due to acute myocardial infarction (20.6%), ongoing cardiogenic shock (15.2%), postoperative low-cardiac-output syndrome (24.2%), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (40.2%). Overall, intensive care unit survival was 44.7%. Sixty-nine (52.3%) patients could never be extubated. Forty-three (32.6%) were extubated while on ECLS support (group 1) and 20 (15.1%) were extubated after weaning from ECLS (group 2). Patients extubated during ECLS had a significantly shorter total time on ventilator (P = .003, mean difference: -284 hours [95% confidence limits: -83 to -484]) and more invasive ventilation free days (P = .0018; mean difference 8 days [95%CL: 2-14]). Mortality and NIV failure rates were similar between groups. Conclusions: Extubation and NIV are feasible in patients who stabilize during ECLS therapy. Further studies need to address whether extubation has the potential to improve patients outcome or if the feasibility to extubate is a surrogate for disease severeness.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 792
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fetal teratomas - A retrospective observational single-center study
    Simonini, Corinna
    Strizek, Brigitte
    Berg, Christoph
    Gembruch, Ulrich
    Mueller, Andreas
    Heydweiller, Andreas
    Geipel, Annegret
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2021, 41 (03) : 301 - 307
  • [32] Risk factors for noninvasive ventilation failure in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: A prospective, observational cohort study
    Luo, Zujin
    Han, Fusheng
    Li, Yichong
    He, Hangyong
    Yang, Gen
    Mi, Yuhong
    Ma, Yingmin
    Cao, Zhixin
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 39 : 238 - 247
  • [33] Risk factors for noninvasive ventilation failure in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: A prospective, observational cohort study
    Ubeda-Iglesias, A.
    Alonso-Romero, L.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 40 : 275 - 276
  • [34] Digoxin Use in Patients with Sepsis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Schwegman, A.
    Herasevich, S.
    Subat, Y.
    Gajic, O.
    Bennett, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [35] The Impella percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device in cardiogenic shock: a single-center, real-world, observational experience
    Pazzanese, V.
    Ancona, M. B.
    Bertoldi, L. F.
    Pagnesi, M.
    Marini, C.
    Gramegna, M.
    Montorfano, M.
    Chieffo, A.
    Pappalardo, F.
    Camici, P. G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 1010 - 1010
  • [36] Extracorporeal life support in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock: keep them awake
    Mohite, Prashant N.
    Kaul, Sundeep
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Rashid, Naufal
    Fatullayev, Javid
    Zych, Bartlomiej
    Popov, Aron-Frederik
    Maunz, Olaf
    Patil, Nikhil P.
    Garcia-Saez, Diana
    DeRobertis, Fabio
    Bahrami, Toufan
    Amrani, Mohamed
    Banner, Nicholas R.
    Simon, Andre R.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 20 (06) : 755 - 760
  • [37] Outcomes of 576 patients with extracorporeal life support for the treatment of perioperative cardiogenic shock
    Aboud, Anas
    Hueting, Felix
    Fujita, Buntaro
    Zittermann, Armin
    Al-Khalil, Riad
    Puehler, Thomas
    Ensminger, Stephan
    Gummert, Jan
    INTERDISCIPLINARY CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 39 (03):
  • [38] Extracorporeal Life Support in Patients with Primary Cardiogenic Shock: Predictors of Recovery and Survival
    Tarzia, V.
    Bagozzi, L.
    Bortolussi, G.
    Bellanti, E.
    Zanella, F.
    Bianco, R.
    Guglielmi, C.
    Testolin, L.
    Bottio, T.
    Gerosa, G.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (04): : S265 - S266
  • [39] Outcome of elderly patients undergoing extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock
    De Waha, S.
    Fuernau, G.
    Graf, T.
    Eitel, I.
    Desch, S.
    Wiedau, A.
    Lurz, P.
    Schuler, G.
    Thiele, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 601 - 601
  • [40] Efficacy of central extracorporeal life support for patients with fulminant myocarditis and cardiogenic shock
    Tadokoro, Naoki
    Fukushima, Satsuki
    Minami, Kimito
    Taguchi, Takura
    Saito, Tetsuya
    Kawamoto, Naonori
    Kakuta, Takashi
    Seguchi, Osamu
    Watanabe, Takuya
    Doi, Seiko Nakajima
    Kuroda, Kensuke
    Suzuki, Keisuke
    Yanase, Masanobu
    Asaumi, Yasuhide
    Shimizu, Hideyuki
    Fukushima, Norihide
    Fujita, Tomoyuki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 60 (05) : 1184 - 1192