Performance evaluation of water collection systems for a hybrid dephlegmator

被引:2
|
作者
du Plessis, Jacques [1 ]
Reuter, Hanno C. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Mech Engn, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
关键词
Water collection; Troughs; Basin; Counter flow; Inlet loss coefficient;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.040
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Trough and basin water collection systems are used in wet-cooling towers and evaporative air-cooled heat exchangers to collect cooling or deluge water below the fill or heat exchanger bundle at the air inlet. Trough systems typically collect water in overlapping parallel troughs while allowing air to pass upwards between the troughs, whereas basin systems collect the water in a basin and the air enters laterally above the basin edge. The novel hybrid (dry/wet) dephlegmator (HDWD) requires a deluge water collection system supported high above the ground. A trough system is therefore considered the best option for this application. Apart from patents, limited information is found on the design and air-side loss coefficients of such systems and how they compare to equivalent basin systems. An existing trough collection system is therefore investigated experimentally to determine its collection effectiveness and drainage capability and to measure pressure drop characteristics. Modifications are made that increase the collection effectiveness from 92% to 100%. Parametric CFD models are developed and used to determine the loss coefficients for the trough and various basin system designs and empirical relations are proposed. A comparison shows that the trough system generally has the lowest loss coefficient and pumping head requirements. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 978
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS
    BRADY, J
    GOODMAN, S
    KERRI, K
    REED, R
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1979, 51 (04): : 695 - 708
  • [32] Geographic information systems - tool for evaluation of the hydroenergy performance of water supply systems
    Pimentel Almeida Santos, Aline Christian
    Rodrigues Pereira, Jose Almir
    Rego, Augusto da Gama
    Santos, Rogerio da Silva
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 39 (02) : 231 - 239
  • [33] Performance evaluation of hybrid RO/MEE systems powered by a WTE plant
    Messineo, A.
    Marchese, F.
    DESALINATION, 2008, 229 (1-3) : 82 - 93
  • [34] Performance evaluation of hybrid multimedia-on-demand systems with reneging users
    Lee, VWH
    Wong, EWM
    Ko, KT
    Tang, KS
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, E87B (05) : 1430 - 1433
  • [35] Hybrid modelling and performance evaluation of switched discrete-event systems
    Wang, L
    CONTROL AND CYBERNETICS, 2004, 33 (02): : 311 - 321
  • [36] Performance evaluation and model checking in systems modeled as Hybrid Petri nets
    Renganathan, K.
    Bhaskar, Vidhyacharan
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (08) : 3941 - 3947
  • [37] Performance evaluation of hybrid crowdsensing systems with stateful CrowdSenSim 2.0 simulator
    Montori, Federico
    Bedogni, Luca
    Fiandrino, Claudio
    Capponi, Andrea
    Bononi, Luciano
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 161 : 225 - 237
  • [38] Evaluation of best system performance: Human, automated, and hybrid inspection systems
    Jiang, XC
    Gramopadhye, AK
    Melloy, BJ
    Grimes, LW
    HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING, 2003, 13 (02): : 137 - 152
  • [39] Stochastic approach for performance evaluation regarding water distribution systems
    Moederl, M.
    Fetz, T.
    Rauch, W.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (09) : 29 - 36
  • [40] Evaluation of LoRa Network Performance for Water Quality Monitoring Systems
    Taha, Syarifah Nabilah Syed
    Abu Talip, Mohamad Sofian
    Mohamad, Mahazani
    Hasan, Zati Hakim Azizul
    Izam, Tengku Faiz Tengku Mohmed Noor
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (16):