How to perform diffusion-weighted imaging

被引:8
|
作者
Bydder, GM [1 ]
Rutherford, MA [1 ]
Hajnal, JV [1 ]
机构
[1] Hammersmith Hosp, MRC, Ctr Clin Sci, Robert Steiner Magnet Resonance Unit, London W12 0HS, England
关键词
magnetic resonance; diffusion-weighted imaging; anisotropy; brain; infarction;
D O I
10.1007/s003810000281
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has become an invaluable tool in the management of patients with stroke. DWI relies on detecting the random diffusion of water molecules. In normal tissues this movement may be restricted by the presence of cellular structures, which provide a barrier to free movement. This occurs in myelinated white matter, where movement is restricted more across than along fibres. This directional dependence is termed anisotropic restricted diffusion. The diffusion of water molecules can be made the dominant contrast mechanism within an image by applying large magnetic field gradients. The pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE) sequence provides sensitivity to diffusion with gradient pulses either side of the 180 degrees refocusing pulse. This sequence is generally heavily T2 weighted. In order to detect normal anisotropic properties within the different components of the medullary core, association, commissural and projection fibres, DWI must be performed with sensitisation in at least three directions. PGSE sequences have been used to obtain the diffusion coefficient (D*), a measure of mobility at the molecular level within tissue. In acute infarction D* is increased; in brain death it is decreased. Diffusion contrast needs to be optimised in relation to the highly T2-dependent nature of PGSE sequences. This also requires a more detailed knowledge of how D* changes in disease, but information on nonischaemic neurological conditions is still very limited.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast
    de Bazelaire, C.
    Pluvinage, A.
    Chapelier, M.
    Hamy, A. S.
    Albiter, M.
    Farges, C.
    Bourrier, P.
    Zagdanski, A. M.
    Espie, M.
    de Kerviler, E.
    Frija, J.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2010, 91 (03): : 394 - 407
  • [42] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spine: Is it reliable?
    Castillo, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) : 1251 - 1253
  • [43] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Mukherji, SK
    Chenevert, TL
    Castillo, M
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 22 (02) : 118 - 122
  • [44] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the spinal column
    Baur, A
    Dietrich, O
    Reiser, M
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 12 (01) : 147 - +
  • [45] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Oncology: An Update
    Messina, Carmelo
    Bignone, Rodolfo
    Bruno, Alberto
    Bruno, Antonio
    Bruno, Federico
    Calandri, Marco
    Caruso, Damiano
    Coppolino, Pietro
    De Robertis, Riccardo
    Gentili, Francesco
    Grazzini, Irene
    Natella, Raffaele
    Scalise, Paola
    Barile, Antonio
    Grassi, Roberto
    Albano, Domenico
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06) : 1 - 28
  • [46] Diffusion-weighted imaging in brain aspergillosis
    Charlot, M.
    Pialat, J.-B.
    Obadia, N.
    Boibieux, A.
    Streichenberger, N.
    Meyronnet, D.
    Cotton, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 (08) : 912 - 916
  • [47] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain
    Naggara, O.
    Letourneau-Guillon, L.
    Mellerio, C.
    Belair, M.
    Pruvo, J.-P.
    Leclerc, X.
    Meder, J.-F.
    Oppenheim, C.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2010, 91 (03): : 329 - 351
  • [48] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Abdominal Oncology
    Li, Zhen
    Bonekamp, Susanne
    Kamel, Ihab
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2012, 8 (02) : 82 - 91
  • [49] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Bone Marrow
    Dietrich, Olaf
    Biffar, Andreas
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Baur-Melnyk, Andrea
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 13 (02) : 134 - 144
  • [50] Diffusion-weighted imaging in moyamoya disease
    Soman, TB
    Takeoka, M
    Dooling, EC
    Caviness, V
    JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2001, 16 (07) : 526 - 530