The feasibility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography(PSMA PET/CT)-guided radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients

被引:34
|
作者
Guler, O. C. [1 ]
Engels, B. [2 ]
Onal, C. [3 ]
Everaert, H. [4 ]
Van den Begin, R. [2 ]
Gevaert, T. [2 ]
de Ridder, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Dept Radiotherapy, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Baskent Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Adana, Turkey
[4] Vrije Univ Brussel, UZ Brussel, Dept Nucl Med, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
来源
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
Image-guided radiotherapy; Oligometastatic prostate cancer; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Radiotherapy; GA-68-PSMA LIGAND PET/CT; RECURRENT; METASTASES; C-11-CHOLINE; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s12094-017-1736-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (Ga-68-PSMA) PET-CT-guided RT in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer retrospectively. A total of 23 prostate cancer patients with biochemical relapse, of which 13 were castration sensitive (CS) and 10 castration resistant (CR), were treated with intensity-modulated and image-guided RT (IMRT-IGRT) on 3 metastases detected by Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT. Androgen deprivation therapy was continued in CR patients. A total of 38 metastases were treated. The involved sites were pelvic bone (n = 16), pelvic lymph nodes (n = 11), paraaortic lymph nodes (n = 6), ribs (n = 3) and vertebral body (n = 2). The median PSA prior to RT was 1.1 ng/mL (range 0.1-29.0 ng/mL). A median dose of 43.5 Gy (range 30-64 Gy) was delivered by IMRT-IGRT in 12-27 fractions. At a median follow-up of 7 months (range 2-17 months), 19 patients (83%) were in remission. Four patients (17%) developed distant recurrences. The actuarial 1-year LC, PFS and OS rates were 100, 51 (95% CI 8-83%) and 100%. Univariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significantly better PFS in CS patients as compared to CR patients (1-year PFS 67 vs. 0%, p < 0.01). One patient experienced grade 2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity. Grade 3 or more toxicity events were not observed. By providing optimal LC, low toxicity and a promising PFS in CS patients, the current retrospective study illustrated that Ga-68 PSMA PET-CT-guided RT may be an attractive treatment strategy in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Validation by randomized trials is eagerly awaited.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 490
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) staging for clinically node-positive prostate cancer
    Leow, Boon Yang Jerome
    Eade, Thomas
    Hruby, George
    Lieng, Hester
    Hsiao, Edward
    Brown, Chris
    Kneebone, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [22] A Review of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
    Ahn, Thomas
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Abduljabar, Aous
    Joshi, Andre
    Perera, Marlon
    Rhee, Handoo
    Wood, Simon
    Vela, Ian
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 21 (05) : 799 - 807
  • [23] A Review of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
    Thomas Ahn
    Matthew J. Roberts
    Aous Abduljabar
    Andre Joshi
    Marlon Perera
    Handoo Rhee
    Simon Wood
    Ian Vela
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2019, 21 : 799 - 807
  • [24] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) for urologists-when and which tracer?
    Berliner, Christoph
    Kesch, Claudia
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Eiber, Matthias
    Maurer, Tobias
    UROLOGE, 2022, 61 (04): : 384 - 391
  • [25] Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) and PET/magnetic resonance (MR) in prostate cancer
    Shayegan, Bobby
    Zukotynski, Katherine
    Benard, Francois
    Menard, Cynthia
    Kuk, Joda
    Sistani, Golmehr
    Bauman, Glenn
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    Metser, Ur
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (06): : 162 - 172
  • [26] Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) compared to computed tomography (CT) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
    Pathmanathan, Shivanshan
    Tariq, Arsalan
    Gan, Chun Loo
    Pearce, Adam
    Rhee, Handoo
    Kyle, Samuel
    Raveenthiran, Sheliyan
    Wong, David
    McBean, Rhiannon
    Marsh, Philip
    Goodman, Steven
    Dhiantravan, Nattakorn
    Esler, Rachel
    Dunglison, Nigel
    Navaratnam, Anojan
    Yaxley, John
    Thomas, Paul
    Pattison, David A.
    Goh, Jeffrey C.
    Roberts, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [27] Microcosting Study of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer
    Parkinson, Bonny
    Sharma, Rajan
    Jeet, Varinder
    Song, Rachel
    Hoyle, Martin
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 32 : 17 - 22
  • [28] [68Ga]PSMA-11 for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer
    Clore, Jessica
    Scott, Peter J. H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2024,
  • [29] The Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Management of Patients With Prostate Cancer: Implications for Selection of Patients for Radiation Therapy
    Amit, U.
    Goldstein, J. D.
    Davidson, T.
    Hahiashvili, M.
    Goshen, E.
    Oksman, Y.
    Berger, R.
    Saad, A.
    Sadetsky, I.
    Chikman, B.
    Lawrence, Y. R.
    Ben-Haim, S.
    Symon, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : S112 - S113
  • [30] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) for local staging of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sungmin Woo
    Soleen Ghafoor
    Anton S. Becker
    Sangwon Han
    Andreas G. Wibmer
    Hedvig Hricak
    Irene A. Burger
    Heiko Schöder
    Hebert Alberto Vargas
    European Journal of Hybrid Imaging, 4