Environmental effects of short-rotation woody crops for bioenergy: What is and isn't known

被引:35
|
作者
Griffiths, Natalie A. [1 ,2 ]
Rau, Benjamin M. [3 ]
Vache, Kellie B. [4 ]
Starr, Gregory [5 ]
Bitew, Menberu M. [6 ]
Aubrey, Doug P. [7 ,8 ]
Martin, James A. [7 ,8 ]
Benton, Elizabeth [8 ]
Jackson, C. Rhett [8 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Climate Change Sci Inst, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Environm Sci Div, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, USDA, Savannah River Forestry Sci Lab, Aiken, SC USA
[4] Oregon State Univ, Dept Biol & Ecol Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Dept Biol Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[6] USDA ARS, Southwest Watershed Res Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[7] Univ Georgia, Savannah River Ecol Lab, Aiken, SC USA
[8] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 04期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
aquatic macroinvertebrates; best management practices; bioenergy; carbon/water tradeoffs; hydrologic modeling; soil organic carbon; southeastern United States; terrestrial biodiversity; water quality; woody feedstocks; WATER-QUALITY IMPACTS; STREAMSIDE MANAGEMENT ZONES; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; AGRICULTURAL LAND; PINE PLANTATIONS; CARBON DYNAMICS; FOREST FERTILIZATION; HERBICIDE TRANSPORT; CROPLAND CONVERSION; SEDIMENT DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12536
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Logging and mill residues are currently the largest sources of woody biomass for bioenergy in the United States, but short-rotation woody crops (SRWCs) are expected to become a larger contributor to biomass production, primarily on lands marginal for food production. However, there are very few studies on the environmental effects of SRWCs, and most have been conducted at stand rather than at watershed scales. In this manuscript, we review the potential environmental effects of SRWCs relative to current forestry or agricultural practices and best management practices (BMPs) in the southeast United States and identify priorities and constraints for monitoring and modeling these effects. Plot-scale field studies and a watershed-scale modeling study found improved water quality with SRWCs compared to agricultural crops. Further, a recent watershed-scale experiment suggests that conventional forestry BMPs are sufficient to protect water quality from SRWC silvicultural activities, but the duration of these studies is short with respect to travel times of groundwater transporting nitrate to streams. While the effects of SRWC production on carbon (C) and water budgets depend on both soil properties and previous land management, woody crops will typically sequester more C when compared with agricultural crops. The overall C offset by SRWCs will depend on a variety of management practices, the number of rotations, and climate. Effects of SRWCs on biodiversity, especially aquatic organisms, are not well studied, but a meta-analysis found that bird and mammal biodiversity is lower in SRWC stands than unmanaged forests. Long-term (i.e., over multiple rotations) water quality, water use, C dynamics, and soil quality studies are needed, as are larger-scale (i.e., landscape scale) biodiversity studies, to evaluate the potential effects of SRWC production. Such research should couple field measurement and modeling approaches due to the temporal (i.e., multiple rotations) and spatial (i.e., heterogeneous landscape) scaling issues involved with SRWC production.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 572
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Increased Soil Fertility on the Yield and Energy Value of Short-Rotation Woody Crops
    Mariusz J. Stolarski
    Michał Krzyżaniak
    Stefan Szczukowski
    Józef Tworkowski
    Dariusz Załuski
    Arkadiusz Bieniek
    Janusz Gołaszewski
    BioEnergy Research, 2015, 8 : 1136 - 1147
  • [22] SRWC-PEAM: A Comprehensive Appraisal Tool for Short-Rotation Woody Crops in the Southeast
    Ghezehei, Solomon B.
    Hazel, Dennis W.
    Nichols, Elizabeth Guthrie
    JOURNAL OF EXTENSION, 2020, 58 (05):
  • [23] Neglected carbon pools and fluxes in the soil balance of short-rotation woody biomass crops
    Berhongaray, G.
    Ceulemans, R.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2015, 73 : 62 - 66
  • [24] Functional Approach to Simulating Short-Rotation Woody Crops in Process-Based Models
    Guo, Tian
    Engel, Bernard A.
    Shao, Gang
    Arnold, Jeffrey G.
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Kiniry, James R.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (04) : 1598 - 1613
  • [25] Effect of Increased Soil Fertility on the Yield and Energy Value of Short-Rotation Woody Crops
    Stolarski, Mariusz J.
    Krzyzaniak, Michal
    Szczukowski, Stefan
    Tworkowski, Jozef
    Zaluski, Dariusz
    Bieniek, Arkadiusz
    Golaszewski, Janusz
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (03) : 1136 - 1147
  • [26] Large-scale economic integration of electricity from short-rotation woody crops
    Varela, M
    Sáez, R
    Audus, H
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2001, 70 (02) : 95 - 107
  • [27] Scientific Basis for Sustainable Management of Eucalyptus and Populus as Short-Rotation Woody Crops in the US
    Vance, Eric D.
    Loehle, Craig
    Wigley, T. Bently
    Weatherford, Philip
    FORESTS, 2014, 5 (05) : 901 - 918
  • [28] The economic feasibility of reclaiming phosphate mined lands with short-rotation woody crops in Florida
    Langholtz, Matthew
    Carter, Douglas R.
    Rockwood, Donald L.
    Alavalapati, Janaki R. R.
    JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2007, 12 (04) : 237 - 249
  • [29] Financial Analysis of the Cultivation of Short Rotation Woody Crops for Bioenergy in Belgium: Barriers and Opportunities
    Ouafik El Kasmioui
    Reinhart Ceulemans
    BioEnergy Research, 2013, 6 : 336 - 350
  • [30] Initial greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen leaching losses associated with converting pastureland to short-rotation woody bioenergy crops in northern Michigan, USA
    Nikiema, Paligwende
    Rothstein, David E.
    Miller, Raymond O.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 39 : 413 - 426