Small Area Shrinkage Estimation

被引:34
|
作者
Datta, G. [1 ]
Ghosh, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Stat, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Stat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Area-level models; BLUP; confidence intervals; EBLUP; empirical Bayes; hierarchical Bayes; mean squared error; multivariate; second-order unbiased; unit-level models; EMPIRICAL BAYES ESTIMATION; MEAN SQUARED ERROR; CONSTRAINED BAYES; ROBUST ESTIMATION; STANDARD ERRORS; LINEAR-MODELS; PREDICTION; POPULATION; UNCERTAINTY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1214/11-STS374
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The need for small area estimates is increasingly felt in both the public and private sectors in order to formulate their strategic plans. It is now widely recognized that direct small area survey estimates are highly unreliable owing to large standard errors and coefficients of variation. The reason behind this is that a survey is usually designed to achieve a specified level of accuracy at a higher level of geography than that of small areas. Lack of additional resources makes it almost imperative to use the same data to produce small area estimates. For example, if a survey is designed to estimate per capita income for a state, the same survey data need to be used to produce similar estimates for counties, subcounties and census divisions within that state. Thus, by necessity, small area estimation needs explicit, or at least implicit, use of models to link these areas. Improved small area estimates are found by "borrowing strength" from similar neighboring areas. The key to small area estimation is shrinkage of direct estimates toward some regression estimates obtained by using in addition administrative records and other available sources of information. These shrinkage estimates can often be motivated from both a Bayesian and a frequentist point of view, and indeed in this particular context, it is possible to obtain at least an operational synthesis between the two paradigms. Thus, on one hand, while small area estimates can be developed using a hierarchical Bayesian or an empirical Bayesian approach, similar estimates are also found using the theory of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) or empirical best linear unbiased prediction (EBLUP). The present article discusses primarily normal theory-based small area estimation techniques, and attempts a synthesis between both the Bayesian and the frequentist points of view. The results are mostly discussed for random effects models and their hierarchical Bayesian counterparts. A few miscellaneous remarks are made at the end describing the current research for more complex models including some nonnormal ones. Also provided are some pointers for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 114
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robust Small Area Estimation and Oversampling in the Estimation of Poverty Indicators
    Giusti, Caterina
    Marchetti, Stefano
    Pratesi, Monica
    Salvati, Nicola
    SURVEY RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 6 (03): : 155 - 163
  • [42] Mixed model prediction and small area estimation
    Jiming Jiang
    P. Lahiri
    TEST, 2006, 15
  • [43] Bayesian transformed models for small area estimation
    Dagne, GA
    TEST, 2001, 10 (02) : 375 - 391
  • [44] Mixed model prediction and small area estimation
    Jiang, Jiming
    Lahiri, P.
    TEST, 2006, 15 (01) : 1 - 59
  • [45] Local stationarity in small area estimation models
    Roberto Benedetti
    Monica Pratesi
    Nicola Salvati
    Statistical Methods & Applications, 2013, 22 : 81 - 95
  • [46] Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping
    Wakefield, Jonathan
    Okonek, Taylor
    Pedersen, Jon
    INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2020, 88 (02) : 398 - 418
  • [47] Fence method for nonparametric small area estimation
    Jiang, Jiming
    Nguyen, Thuan
    Rao, J. Sunil
    SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2010, 36 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [48] Bayesian benchmarking with applications to small area estimation
    Datta, G. S.
    Ghosh, M.
    Steorts, R.
    Maples, J.
    TEST, 2011, 20 (03) : 574 - 588
  • [49] Small area estimation of the Gini concentration coefficient
    Fabrizi, Enrico
    Trivisano, Carlo
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2016, 99 : 223 - 234
  • [50] New Important Developments in Small Area Estimation
    Pfeffermann, Danny
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 28 (01) : 40 - 68