Setting priorities for protected area planning in a conflict zone - Afghanistan's National Protected Area System Plan

被引:10
|
作者
Johnson, McKenzie F. [1 ]
Kanderian, Nina [1 ]
Shank, Christopher C. [1 ]
Rahmani, Haqiq [1 ]
Lawson, David [1 ]
Smallwood, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Afghanistan Program, Wildlife Conservat Soc, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[2] Univ Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
关键词
Afghanistan; Protected area planning; Conservation planning; Conflict; Conservation hotspots; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; WAR; WILDLIFE; ECOREGIONS; WARFARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.021
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Planning for protected area networks is often done on an ad hoc basis, especially in data-poor countries. Afghanistan, a country mired in conflict for the past 30 years, has little of the relevant data to plan a protected area network, and security concerns hinder collection of new data. However, conservation of Afghanistan's natural resources will be critical to recovery efforts. To assist Afghanistan in planning for its protected area network, we conducted an analysis to identify ecologically important areas for conservation. We overlaid data from ecoregion, floral, and faunal analyses on a grid map of Afghanistan (313 cells each 2500 km(2)), and used a ranking system to determine those cells containing diverse and/or threatened ecosystems. A color gradation was applied to each cell (white - least diverse to black - most diverse) to produce a map visually depicting ecological diversity across Afghanistan. Those cells with the highest scores were labeled as Priority Zones - defined as areas in which Afghanistan should prioritize conservation activities for protected area designation. Our results formed the basis of the National Protected Area System Plan of Afghanistan, a document setting quantitative protected area targets and outlining a concrete plan of action for the designation of a protected area network. We found the Priority Zone model to be useful in helping Government partners locate areas potentially important for conservation and prioritize activities for protected area designation. This process may be useful for other conflict or post-conflict countries working to establish protected area networks in a data deficient environment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 155
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Construction of a National Trail Research Framework under a Natural Protected Area System
    Li, Ziyi
    Mao, Liang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [43] Pastoralism and protected area management in Mongolia's Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park
    Bedunah, DJ
    Schmidt, SM
    DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2004, 35 (01) : 167 - 191
  • [44] AN INTERDISCIPLINARY METHODOLOGY, THE TOURISM SETTING OF A PROTECTED AND LIVING NATURAL AREA
    Escobar Jimenez, Kelly
    ANUARIO TURISMO Y SOCIEDAD, 2007, 8 : 129 - 143
  • [45] Land conversion at the protected area's edge
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    Doran, Patrick J.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (05): : 349 - 358
  • [46] Prospects and challenges coexist in China’s new protected area system
    Chunlin Li
    Tingting Yao
    Xiaoyi Wang
    Baowei Zhang
    Huijie Qiao
    Junhua Hu
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2022, 31 : 315 - 319
  • [47] Prospects and challenges coexist in China's new protected area system
    Li, Chunlin
    Yao, Tingting
    Wang, Xiaoyi
    Zhang, Baowei
    Qiao, Huijie
    Hu, Junhua
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 31 (01) : 315 - 319
  • [48] Local engagement in environmental peacebuilding: protected area development as a pathway to peace in Afghanistan
    Johnson, McKenzie F.
    DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (06) : 755 - 767
  • [49] The role of privately protected areas in achieving biodiversity representation within a national protected area network
    Ivanova, Ielyzaveta M.
    Cook, Carly N.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (12)
  • [50] Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration
    Lawler, Joshua J.
    Rinnan, D. Scott
    Michalak, Julia L.
    Withey, John C.
    Randels, Christopher R.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 375 (1794)