Prospective Study of Avian Influenza Infection in Backyard Poultry Flocks and Flock Handlers in Wisconsin

被引:10
|
作者
Donahue, James G. [1 ]
Coleman, Laura A. [1 ]
Bender, Jeffrey [2 ]
Kempf, Debra [1 ]
Vandermause, Mary F. [1 ]
McGraw, Paul J. [3 ]
Lauer, Dale C. [4 ]
Belongia, Edward A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Marshfield Clin Res Fdn, Epidemiol Res Ctr ML2, Marshfield, WI 54449 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Coll Vet Med, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[3] Wisconsin Dept Agr Trade & Consumer Protect, Div Anim Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[4] Board Anim Hlth, Minnesota Poultry Testing Lab, Willmar, MN USA
关键词
Avian influenza; Influenza/epidemiology; Influenza virus A; Poultry; Transmission; A H5N1 INFECTION; VIRUSES; TURKEYS; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1089/vbz.2010.0260
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The continuing epizootic of H5N1 avian influenza (AI) in Asia and subsequent zoonotic transmission has led to heightened concerns about a pandemic and the demand for improved surveillance of poultry in all sectors, including backyard poultry. We conducted a 15-month prospective study to determine the prevalence of AI in backyard poultry and extent of transmission to flock handlers. Methods: Starting July 2007, registered poultry owners in six counties in central Wisconsin were mailed invitations to participate; household members with poultry exposure were also invited. Premises with < 1000 birds were eligible. Participants completed a baseline interview to characterize poultry exposures. Illness in flocks and flock handlers was monitored using semimonthly telephone interviews and self-report of acute influenza-like symptoms by flock handlers. Participants provided blood at baseline and at the end of the surveillance period for serology and, if ill, nasopharyngeal, eye, and throat swabs for viral testing. Blood was also collected at baseline from a convenience sample of adult poultry. Results: We enrolled 87 flocks and 128 persons who had regular contact with poultry. Influenza-like symptoms were reported by 77 (65%) persons. Swabs were collected from 53 persons at 88 illness episodes. AI was not isolated, but five persons were positive for human influenza. Twenty-one participants (20%) seroconverted to at least one human influenza strain, but there were no seroconversions to AI. Blood samples from all 717 birds tested were seronegative for influenza. Conclusion: Despite limited biosecurity there was no evidence of AI infection in participating backyard flocks or flock handlers.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1293 / 1297
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sero-survey of Avian Influenza in backyard poultry and wild bird species in Iran-2014
    Mehrabadi, M. H. Fallah
    Bahonar, A. R.
    Marandi, M. Vasfi
    Sadrzadeh, A.
    Tehrani, F.
    Salman, M. D.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2016, 128 : 1 - 5
  • [42] Prospective study of avian influenza H9 infection in commercial poultry farms of Punjab Province and Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan
    Chaudhry, Mamoona
    Ahmad, Maqbool
    Bin Rashid, Hamad
    Sultan, Bakhat
    Chaudhry, Haroon Rashid
    Riaz, Aayesha
    Shaheen, Muhammad Shabir
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2017, 49 (01) : 213 - 220
  • [43] Prospective study of avian influenza H9 infection in commercial poultry farms of Punjab Province and Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan
    Mamoona Chaudhry
    Maqbool Ahmad
    Hamad Bin Rashid
    Bakhat Sultan
    Haroon Rashid Chaudhry
    Aayesha Riaz
    Muhammad Shabir Shaheen
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2017, 49 : 213 - 220
  • [44] Serosurvey of Avian Influenza Viruses (H5, H7, and H9) and Associated Risk Factors in Backyard Poultry Flocks of Lahore District, Pakistan
    Chaudhry, Mamoona
    Bin Rashid, Hamad
    Thrusfield, Michael
    Eisler, Mark C.
    Welburn, Susan C.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [45] Molecular epidemiology of avian influenza viruses circulating among healthy poultry flocks in farms in northern Vietnam
    Takakuwa, Hiroki
    Yamashiro, Tetsu
    Le, Mai Q.
    Phuong, Lien S.
    Ozaki, Hiroichi
    Tsunekuni, Ryota
    Usui, Tatsufumi
    Ito, Hiroshi
    Morimatsu, Masami
    Tomioka, Yukiko
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Ito, Toshihiro
    Murase, Toshiyuki
    Ono, Etsuro
    Otsuki, Koichi
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2012, 103 (2-3) : 192 - 200
  • [46] The impact of selected risk factors on the occurrence of highly pathogenic avian influenza in commercial poultry flocks in Poland
    Gierak, Anna
    Smietanka, Krzysztof
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2021, 65 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [47] SERO SURVEY KNOWLEDGE ATTITUDE SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF POULTRY DISEASES HANDLERS AVIAN INFLUENZA IN INDONESIA YEAR 2008
    Pracoyo, Noer Endah
    Riajuni, Luxi
    Sukarso, Triyani
    Subangkit, Bambang
    Putranto, Rudi Hendro
    MEDIA PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN KESEHATAN, 2012, 22 (04): : 181 - 189
  • [48] INCIDENCE OF AVIAN-LEUKOSIS VIRUS-INFECTION IN NEW-ZEALAND POULTRY FLOCKS
    BELL, CW
    OLIVER, RE
    ROWE, SM
    NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1986, 34 (10) : 179 - 180
  • [49] A flock-tailored early warning system for low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) in commercial egg laying flocks
    Beltran-Alcrudo, Daniel
    Carpenter, Tim E.
    Cardona, Carol
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2009, 92 (04) : 324 - 332
  • [50] Incidence and Seroprevalence of Avian Influenza in a Cohort of Backyard Poultry Growers, Egypt, August 2015-March 2019
    Gomaa, Mokhtar R.
    El Rifay, Amira S.
    Abu Zeid, Dina
    Elabd, Mona A.
    Elabd, Eman
    Kandeil, Ahmed
    Shama, Noura M. Abo
    Kamel, Mina N.
    Marouf, Mohamed A.
    Barakat, Ahmed
    Refaey, Samir
    Naguib, Amal
    McKenzie, Pamela P.
    Webby, Richard J.
    Ali, Mohamed A.
    Kayali, Ghazi
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 26 (09) : 2129 - 2136