New model for capturing the variations of fertilizer-induced emission factors of N2O

被引:52
|
作者
Zhou, Feng [1 ]
Shang, Ziyin [1 ]
Zeng, Zhenzhong [1 ]
Piao, Shilong [1 ]
Ciais, Philippe [2 ]
Raymond, Peter A. [3 ]
Wang, Xuhui [1 ]
Wang, Rong [2 ]
Chen, Minpeng [4 ]
Yang, Changliang [5 ]
Tao, Shu [1 ]
Zhao, Yue [6 ]
Meng, Qian [7 ]
Gao, Shuoshuo [1 ]
Mao, Qi [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sinofrance Inst Earth Syst Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] CEA CNRS UVSQ, Lab Sci Climat & Environm, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[5] Yunnan Univ, Res Inst Engn Technol, Kunming, Peoples R China
[6] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, Dept Water Environm Planning, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Connecticut, Dept Stat, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
nitrous oxide; agricultural soils; emission factor; nonlinear response; Bayesian inference; data mining; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; NONLINEAR RESPONSE; PADDY FIELDS; TEMPERATURE; CHINA; SOILS; DENITRIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; INVENTORY; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1002/2014GB005046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accumulating evidence indicates that N2O emission factors (EFs) vary with nitrogen additions and environmental variations. Yet the impact of the latter was often ignored by previous EF determinations. We developed piecewise statistical models (PMs) to explain how the N2O EFs in agricultural soils depend upon various predictors such as climate, soil attributes, and agricultural management. The PMs are derived from a new Bayesian Recursive Regression Tree algorithm. The PMs were applied to the case of EFs from agricultural soils in China, a country where large EF spatial gradients prevail. The results indicate substantial improvements of the PMs compared with other EF determinations. First, PMs are able to reproduce a larger fraction of the variability of observed EFs for upland grain crops (84%, n=381) and paddy rice (91%, n=161) as well as the ratio of EFs to nitrogen application rates (73%, n=96). The superior predictive accuracy of PMs is further confirmed by evaluating their predictions against independent EF measurements (n=285) from outside China. Results show that the PMs calibrated using Chinese data can explain 75% of the variance. Hence, the PMs could be reliable for upscaling of N2O EFs and fluxes for regions that have a phase space of predictors similar to China. Results from the validated models also suggest that climatic factors regulate the heterogeneity of EFs in China, explaining 69% and 85% of their variations for upland grain crops and paddy rice, respectively. The corresponding N2O EFs in 2008 are 0.840.18% (as N2O-N emissions divided by the total N input) for upland grain crops and 0.650.14% for paddy rice, the latter being twice as large as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Tier 1 defaults. Based upon these new estimates of EFs, we infer that only 22% of current arable land could achieve a potential reduction of N2O emission of 50%.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 897
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contrasting effects of biochar on N2O emission and N uptake at different N fertilizer levels on a temperate sandy loam
    Sun, Zhencai
    Saenger, Anja
    Rebensburg, Philip
    Lentzsch, Peter
    Wirth, Stephan
    Kaupenjohann, Martin
    Meyer-Aurich, Andreas
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 578 : 557 - 565
  • [42] N2O Emission Factors from Wastewater Treatment Plants Based on Literature Statistics and Model Fitting
    Abulimiti A.
    Wang P.-Y.
    Wang X.-H.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (07): : 4063 - 4073
  • [43] Effect of no-tillage and conventional tillage practices on the nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in an upland soil: soil N2O emission as affected by the fertilizer applications
    Yoo, Jin
    Woo, Sun-Hee
    Park, Ki-Do
    Chung, Keun-Yook
    APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 59 (06) : 787 - 797
  • [44] Biochar mitigates the stimulatory effects of straw incorporation on N2O emission and N2O/(N2O + N2) ratio in upland soil
    Li, Chenglin
    Wei, Zhijun
    Wang, Xiaomin
    Ma, Xiaofang
    Tang, Quan
    Zhao, Bingzi
    Shan, Jun
    Yan, Xiaoyuan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 369
  • [45] N2O emission and the N2O/(N2O + N2) product ratio of denitrification as controlled by available carbon substrates and nitrate concentrations
    Senbayram, M.
    Chen, R.
    Budai, A.
    Bakken, L.
    Dittert, K.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 147 : 4 - 12
  • [46] Effect of no-tillage and conventional tillage practices on the nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in an upland soil: soil N2O emission as affected by the fertilizer applications
    Jin Yoo
    Sun-Hee Woo
    Ki-Do Park
    Keun-Yook Chung
    Applied Biological Chemistry, 2016, 59 : 787 - 797
  • [47] Carbon stability and mitigation of fertilizer induced N2O emissions in soil amended with biochar
    Grutzmacher, Priscila
    Puga, Aline Peregrina
    Silveira Bibar, Maria Paula
    Coscione, Aline Renee
    Packer, Ana Paula
    de Andrade, Cristiano Alberto
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 625 : 1459 - 1466
  • [48] A model to predict the effects of soil structure on denitrification and N2O emission
    Laudone, G. M.
    Matthews, G. P.
    Bird, N. R. A.
    Whalley, W. R.
    Cardenas, L. M.
    Gregory, A. S.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 409 (1-2) : 283 - 290
  • [49] Measuring denitrification and the N2O:(N2O + N2) emission ratio from terrestrial soils
    Friedl, Johannes
    Cardenas, Laura M.
    Clough, Timothy J.
    Dannenmann, Michael
    Hu, Chunsheng
    Scheer, Clemens
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 47 : 61 - 71
  • [50] New finding of Trichoderma asperellum in decreasing soil N2O emission
    Wu, Hong-sheng
    Chen, Su-yun
    Ding, Jun
    Tian, Wei
    Wang, Ti-jian
    Shen, Li-dong
    Li, Yan-hui
    Liu, Zheng
    Li, Ji
    CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 9 (01)