Mobile health apps and recovery after surgery: What are patients willing to do?

被引:50
|
作者
Abelson, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Symer, Matthew [1 ]
Peters, Alex [1 ]
Charlson, Mary [2 ]
Yeo, Heather [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med, Dept Integrat Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2017年 / 214卷 / 04期
关键词
Telemedicine; Medical informatics; Postoperative period; Age factors; Surveys and questionnaires; FOLLOW-UP; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mobile health technologies (mHealth) may improve post-operative care but it is unknown if patients are willing to use this technology. Methods: We surveyed 800 NY State residents to determine their willingness to engage in mHealth after surgery and compared socioeconomic factors that may affect willingness to engage. Results: A majority of respondents reported willingness to wear a tracker on their wrist (80.6%), fill out a survey (74.3%), send pictures of their wound to their surgeon (66.3%), and share updates with friends/family (59.1%). Older age was associated with lower likelihood of having a smartphone, but not associated with willingness to engage with other features. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower likelihood of wearing a tracker while Black race was associated with lower willingness to send pictures. Conclusions: Overall, potential users of mHealth are interested and willing to use mHealth. Older respondents are as willing as younger respondents to engage with mHealth. Individuals with Hispanic ethnicity and Black race may be less willing to engage and therefore may require education regarding benefits of this technology. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 622
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What changes do patients report after strabismus surgery for planned psychosocial benefit?
    Arblaster, Gemma
    Davis, Helen
    Buckley, David
    Barnes, Sarah
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [32] What happens to patients who do not follow-up after bariatric surgery?
    Harper, Jason
    Madan, Atul K.
    Ternovits, Craig A.
    Tichansky, David S.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2007, 73 (02) : 181 - 184
  • [33] What Do Children and Adolescents Value in Their Mental Health Recovery?
    McCarthy M.
    McDevitt S.
    Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 2018, 5 (1) : 31 - 41
  • [34] Ankle surgery in 2022: What do the scientific articles say, and what do the patients?
    Brilhault, Jean
    Maynou, Carlos
    Bauer, Thomas
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2022, 108 (07)
  • [35] Results of the Clinician Apps Survey, How Clinicians Working With Patients With Diabetes and Obesity Use Mobile Health Apps
    Karduck, Justine
    Chapman-Novakofski, Karen
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 50 (01) : 62 - +
  • [36] Recovery of Pediatric Patients After Firearm Injury: Can Health Systems Do More?
    Borthwell, Rachel M.
    Olanrewaju, Samuel
    Putnam, Brant A.
    Kim, Dennis Y.
    Chong, Vincent E.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2021, 87 (10) : 1644 - 1650
  • [37] Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in thoracic surgery, do they end at discharge?
    Rodriguez, Maria
    Aymerich, Maria
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [38] PILOT STUDY OF A NOVEL MOBILE HEALTH APPLICATION TO TRACK PATIENTS AFTER GI SURGERY
    Symer, Matthew
    Abelson, Jonathan S.
    McClure, Bridget
    Yeo, Heather
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) : S1213 - S1213
  • [39] Evaluation of two mobile health apps for patients with breast cancer using the Mobile Application Rating Scale
    Wright, Alexander
    MHEALTH, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [40] Informed consent for cataract surgery: What patients do and do not understand
    Scanlan, D
    Siddiqui, F
    Perry, G
    Hutnik, CML
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (10): : 1904 - 1912