Therapeutic window for obtaining favorable remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of type B aortic dissection

被引:5
|
作者
Nakajima, Ken [1 ]
Kato, Noriyuki [1 ]
Chino, Shuji [3 ]
Higashigawa, Takatoshi [1 ]
Ouchi, Takafumi [1 ]
Kato, Hiroaki [1 ]
Ito, Hisato [2 ]
Tokui, Toshiya [4 ]
Mizumoto, Toru [5 ]
Miyake, Yoichiro [6 ]
Sakuma, Hajime [1 ]
机构
[1] Mie Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 5148507, Japan
[2] Mie Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Tsu, Mie, Japan
[3] Ise Red Cross Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ise, Japan
[4] Ise Red Cross Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Ise, Japan
[5] Anjo Kosei Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Anjo, Aichi, Japan
[6] Kochi Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Kochi, Japan
关键词
Aortic dissection; Remodeling; TEVAR; STENT-GRAFT PLACEMENT; NATURAL-HISTORY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.043
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the most appropriate timing for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) in terms of remodeling of the aorta. Methods: A total of 41 patients who had undergone TEVAR for the treatment of aortic dissection were included in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: those who had undergone TEVAR in the acute or subacute phase (group A) and those who had undergone TEVAR in the chronic phase (group B). The indications for TEVAR as the treatment of TBAD were the presence of aortic rupture or malperfusion of the aortic branches, a maximum aortic diameter of >= 40 mm on the initial diagnostic computed tomography scan, and/or expansion of the aorta of >= 5 mm within 3 months for acute and subacute TBAD. The indication was amaximum aortic diameter of >= 50 mmor expansion of the aorta of >= 5 mm within 1 year for chronic TBAD. The diameters of the aorta, true lumen, and false lumen were measured at the level of the most dilated part of the descending aorta (level M) and at the diaphragm (level D) on the computed tomography scan obtained before TEVAR and at the 2-year follow-up examination. Results: The median interval between TEVAR and the onset of TBAD was 0.2 month (interquartile range, 0.03-0.7 month) in group A (n = 21) and 32 months (interquartile range, 4.7-35.2 months) in group B (n = 20). Except for the aortic diameter at level D in group B, favorable remodeling was obtained at both levels in both groups. The diameter change ratio of the aorta at level D was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P =.02). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the interval for a significant decrease in the aortic diameter at level D yielded 4.2 months as the optimal threshold for performing TEVAR (area under the curve, 0.859; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.0). Conclusions: TEVAR for TBAD will result in favorable outcomes, irrespective of the timing of the procedure. However, it might be more effective to perform TEVAR within 4.2 months of the onset of TBAD, provided that the TEVAR procedure can be performed safely.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 867
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk factors associated with aortic remodeling in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Wang, X. L.
    Huang, H. Y.
    Li, Z.
    Yu, Y. S.
    Hu, Y. Q.
    Ye, W. X.
    Hua, F.
    Chen, Y. H.
    Ni, H.
    Ding, Q. W.
    Shen, Z. Y.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2015, 14 (04) : 11692 - 11699
  • [22] Anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications do not affect aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection
    Chang, Heepeel
    Rockman, Caron B.
    Cayne, Neal S.
    Veith, Frank J.
    Jacobowitz, Glenn R.
    Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
    Patel, Virendra, I
    Garg, Karan
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (06) : 1833 - +
  • [23] Aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of acute complicated type B aortic dissection
    Conrad, Mark F.
    Crawford, Robert S.
    Kwolek, Christopher J.
    Brewster, David C.
    Brady, Thomas J.
    Cambria, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (03) : 510 - 517
  • [24] Aortic Remodeling After Endovascular Repair of Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection
    Leshnower, Bradley G.
    Duwayri, Yazan M.
    Chen, Edward P.
    Li, Chun
    Zehner, Carl A.
    Binongo, Jose N.
    Veeraswamy, Ravi K.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 103 (06): : 1878 - 1885
  • [25] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection after renal transplantation
    Shu, Chang
    Xiong, QingGen
    Qiu, Jian
    Luo, MingYao
    Fang, Kun
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (53) : 91628 - 91635
  • [26] Reintervention after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Cheng, Li
    Xiang, Dongqiao
    Zhang, Shan
    Zheng, Chuansheng
    Wu, Xiaoyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [27] Predictors for thoracic aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Chen, Yonghui
    Ren, Jianli
    Liu, Zongwei
    Cui, Dongsheng
    Wang, Shuaishuai
    Bi, Jiaxue
    Dai, Xiangchen
    VASCULAR, 2024,
  • [28] Aortic Remodeling and Clinical Outcomes in Type B Aortic Dissection According to the Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Lee, Seung-Jun
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Ko, Young-Guk
    Woo, Yeongmin
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Won, Jong Youn
    Lee, Do-Yun
    Hong, Sung-Jin
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    Kim, Byeong-Keuk
    Choi, Donghoon
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    Jang, Yangsoo
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 67 : 322 - 331
  • [29] Effect of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair on Aortic Remodeling in Patients with Type B Aortic Dissection in an Asian Population
    Tang, Jun Han
    Lo, Zhiwen Joseph
    Wong, Jiayi
    Hong, Qiantai
    Yong, Enming
    Chandrasekar, Sadhana
    Tan, Glenn Wei Leong
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 69 : 352 - 359
  • [30] Challenges of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection
    van Bakel, Theodorus M. J.
    Figueroa, C. Alberto
    van Herwaarden, Joost A.
    Trimarchi, Santi
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2018, 25 (05) : 578 - 580