A Stakeholder Engagement Model for Process Improvement Initiatives

被引:1
|
作者
Abbott, Charon [1 ]
Bandara, Wasana [1 ]
French, Erica [1 ]
Tate, Mary [2 ]
Mathiesen, Paul
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Informat Management, Wellington, New Zealand
来源
关键词
Process improvement; Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder theory; Case study; Robotic Process Automation; RPA; Organizational change; EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-85469-0_28
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite cries from practice and academia, stakeholder engagement in Business Process Ma(BPM) is an under-explored area of research. Developing a comprehensive understanding of what factors influence stakeholder engagement is the first step towards addressing this. While diverse factors are briefly mentioned in prior literature, there has not been any holistic synthesis nor empirical investigation to this. This study presents the first empirically supported framework of stakeholder engagement factors for process improvement projects. The framework was built with a synthesis of literature applying Kassin's [1] social psychology framework as a theoretical lens, and empirical insights from a rich case study conducted at an Australian Financial service provider. The framework presents five levels namely; 'micro', 'meso', 'exo', 'macro', and 'chrono' which represents different 'systems' that host a range of factors that influence stakeholder engagement in process improvement projects. It provides an invaluable point of reference for BPM practitioners when designing stakeholder engagement and intervention programs, especially to develop sustainable strategies for change that enables successful outcomes. It also is a solid foundation and springboard for further academic research.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 472
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholder Engagement Process in Water Saving Initiatives for Sustainable Tourist Destination in Samui Island, Thailand
    Pongponrat, Kannapa
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2022, 30 (03): : 1341 - 1363
  • [2] Stakeholder engagement in the city branding process
    Henninger C.E.
    Foster C.
    Alevizou P.J.
    Frohlich C.
    Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 2016, 12 (4) : 285 - 298
  • [3] A mapping and synthesis of tools for stakeholder and community engagement in quality improvement initiatives for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health
    Spencer, Jessie
    Gilmore, Brynne
    Lodenstein, Elsbet
    Portela, Anayda
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (03) : 744 - 756
  • [4] Continuous and changing stakeholder engagement for organisational sustainability: Proposing the stakeholder engagement flow model
    Fobbe, Lea
    Niss, Camilla
    Hilletofth, Per
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (06) : 6061 - 6074
  • [5] Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement in CSR: A Process Approach
    Lane, Anne Bridget
    Devin, Bree
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (03) : 267 - 280
  • [6] Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP)
    Martinez, Jenny
    Piersol, Catherine Verrier
    Holloway, Sherrie
    Terhorst, Lauren
    Leland, Natalie E.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 43 (10) : 949 - 961
  • [7] Stakeholder engagement process in the EIA of an aluminium smelter
    Lochner, P
    Brooks, W
    Pesch, R
    Münster, F
    LIGHT METALS 2003, 2003, : 471 - 477
  • [8] How to create a meaningful stakeholder engagement process
    Jimena, Jaquelina
    CANADIAN MINING JOURNAL, 2010, 131 (02) : 9 - 9
  • [9] An empirically derived model of the role of IS networks in business process improvement initiatives
    Bhatt, GD
    Stump, RL
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 29 (01): : 29 - 48
  • [10] Global software process improvement initiatives
    Gibson, R
    McGuire, E
    INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 626 - 626